Literature DB >> 27746705

Juvenile winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) and summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus) utilization of Southern New England nurseries: Comparisons among estuarine, tidal river, and coastal lagoon shallow-water habitats.

David L Taylor1, Jason McNamee2, John Lake2, Carissa L Gervasi1, Danial G Palance1.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the relative importance of the N arragansett Bay estuary (RI and MA, USA), and associated tidal rivers and coastal lagoons, as nurseries for juvenile winter flounder, Pseudopleuronectes americanus, and summer flounder, Paralichthys dentatus. Winter flounder (WF) and summer flounder (SF) abundance and growth were measured from May to October (2009-2013) and served as indicators for the use and quality of shallow-water habitats (water depth < 1.5-3.0 m). These bioindicators were then analyzed with respect to physiochemical conditions to determine the mechanisms underlying intra-specific habitat selection. WF and SF abundances were greatest in late May and June (maximum monthly mean = 4.9 and 0.55 flounder/m2 for WF and SF, respectively), and were significantly higher in the tidal rivers relative to the bay and lagoons. Habitat-related patterns in WF and SF abundance were primarily governed by their preferences for oligohaline (0.1-5 ppt) and mesohaline (6-18 ppt) waters, but also their respective avoidance of hypoxic conditions (< 4 mg DO/L) and warm water temperatures (> 25 °C). Flounder habitat usage was also positively related to sediment organic content, which may be due to these substrates having sufficiently high prey densities. WF growth rates (mean = 0.25 ± 0.14 mm/d) were negatively correlated with the abundance of conspecifics, whereas SF growth (mean = 1.39 ± 0.46 mm/d) was positively related to temperature and salinity. Also, contrary to expectations, flounder occupied habitats that offered no ostensible advantage in intra-specific growth rates. WF and SF exposed to low salinities in certain rivers likely experienced increased osmoregulatory costs, thereby reducing energy for somatic growth. Low-salinity habitats, however, may benefit flounder by providing refugia from predation or reduced competition with other estuarine fishes and macro-invertebrates. Examining WF and SF abundance and growth across each species' broader geographic distribution revealed that southern New England habitats may constitute functionally significant nurseries. These results also indicated that juvenile SF have a geographic range extending further north than previously recognized.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abundance; Age-0 juvenile; Growth; Shallow-water nursery habitat; Summer flounder; Winter flounder

Year:  2016        PMID: 27746705      PMCID: PMC5061510          DOI: 10.1007/s12237-016-0089-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Estuaries Coast        ISSN: 1559-2723            Impact factor:   2.976


  5 in total

Review 1.  How should salinity influence fish growth?

Authors:  G Boeuf; P Payan
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.228

2.  Indicators of sediment and biotic mercury contamination in a southern New England estuary.

Authors:  David L Taylor; Jennifer C Linehan; David W Murray; Warren L Prell
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 5.553

3.  Size-related shifts in the habitat associations of young-of-the-year winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus): field observations and laboratory experiments with sediments and prey.

Authors:  B A. Phelan; J P. Manderson; A W. Stoner; A J. Bejda
Journal:  J Exp Mar Bio Ecol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 2.171

4.  Why do juvenile fish utilise mangrove habitats?

Authors:  P Laegdsgaard; C Johnson
Journal:  J Exp Mar Bio Ecol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 2.171

5.  Estuarine and habitat-related differences in growth rates of young-of-the-year winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) and tautog (Tautoga onitis) in three northeastern US estuaries.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Mar Bio Ecol       Date:  2000-04-26       Impact factor: 2.171

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Mercury content of blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus) from southern New England coastal habitats: Contamination in an emergent fishery and risks to human consumers.

Authors:  David L Taylor; Nicholas M Calabrese
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  Blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) population structure in southern New England tidal rivers: Patterns of shallow-water, unvegetated habitat use and quality.

Authors:  David L Taylor; Molly M Fehon
Journal:  Estuaries Coast       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.032

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.