Literature DB >> 27746615

Non-invasive Diagnosis of Oesophageal Varices Using Systemic Haemodynamic Measurements by Finometry: Comparison with Other Non-invasive Predictive Scores.

Kara Rye1, Gerri Mortimore1, Andrew Austin1, Jan Freeman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Cirrhosis and portal hypertension are characterised by a hyperdynamic circulation, which is independently associated with variceal size. Non-invasive techniques for measurement of systemic haemodynamics are now available. The aim of the study was to prospectively assess the accuracy of systemic haemodynamics measured non-invasively for the detection of oesophageal varices in cirrhotic patients as compared to other currently available non-invasive methods.
METHODS: In a study of 29 cirrhotic patients, systemic haemodynamics were studied non-invasively using the Finometer® (mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac output (CO)/index, heart rate (HR), peripheral vascular resistance) and portal pressure was assessed by hepatic venous pressure gradient. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were assessed for predicting presence of varices and large oesophageal varices. Results were compared to child's classification, platelet/spleen ratio and ALT/AST ratios as predictors of the presence of large varices.
RESULTS: Using finometry large oesophageal varices were correctly predicted in 83% of patients compared to other non-invasive techniques (range 66-76%).
CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive assessment of systemic haemodynamics using finometry could aid the identification of patients who do not immediately require variceal surveillance reducing the numbers of endoscopies and ensuring services are provided to those most likely to benefit.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AAR, AST/ALT ratio; CI, cardiac index; CO, cardiac output; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HR, heart rate; HVPG, hepatic venous pressure gradient; IQR, interquartile range; LOV, large oesophageal varices; LR+, positive likelihood ratio; LR−, negative likelihood ratio; MAP, mean arterial pressure; MELD, model of end stage liver disease; NIEC, North Italian Endoscopy Club; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; PSDR, platelet count-to spleen diameter ratio; PT, prothrombin time; PVR, peripheral resistance; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SV, stroke volume; Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity; finometry; non-invasive predictive scores; oesophageal varices; systemic haemodynamics

Year:  2016        PMID: 27746615      PMCID: PMC5052405          DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2016.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol        ISSN: 0973-6883


  36 in total

Review 1.  Performance of platelet count/spleen diameter ratio for diagnosis of esophageal varices in cirrhosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li Ying; Xiao Lin; Zuo-Liu Xie; Yuan-Ping Hu; Ke-Qing Shi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Non-invasive pulsatile arterial pressure and stroke volume changes from the human finger.

Authors:  Lysander W J Bogert; Johannes J van Lieshout
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 2.969

3.  New reliability criteria for transient elastography increase the number of accurate measurements for screening of cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

Authors:  Philipp Schwabl; Simona Bota; Petra Salzl; Mattias Mandorfer; Berit A Payer; Arnulf Ferlitsch; Judith Stift; Friedrich Wrba; Michael Trauner; Markus Peck-Radosavljevic; Thomas Reiberger
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 5.828

4.  Relationships between types of esophagogastric varices and systemic hemodynamics in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Fumio Chikamori; Atsushi Inoue; Hiroshi Okamoto; Nobutoshi Kuniyoshi; Takahiko Kawashima; Yasuhiro Takase
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2011 May-Jun

5.  Real-time shear-wave elastography: applicability, reliability and accuracy for clinically significant portal hypertension.

Authors:  Bogdan Procopet; Annalisa Berzigotti; Juan G Abraldes; Fanny Turon; Virginia Hernandez-Gea; Juan Carlos García-Pagán; Jaime Bosch
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 25.083

6.  Determinants of the hyperdynamic circulation and central hypovolaemia in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Søren Møller; Lise Hobolth; Christine Winkler; Flemming Bendtsen; Erik Christensen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Utilization of platelet count spleen diameter ratio in predicting the presence of esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  Elliot Schwarzenberger; Trinh Meyer; Vidushi Golla; Nicole Pena Sahdala; Albert D Min
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.062

8.  Molecular pathophysiology of portal hypertension.

Authors:  Mercedes Fernandez
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  The cost of screening esophageal varices: traditional endoscopy versus computed tomography.

Authors:  Ashley K Lotfipour; Michael Douek; Sandhya V Shimoga; James W Sayer; Steven B Han; Rome Jutabha; David S K Lu
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Non-invasive predictors of esophageal varices.

Authors:  Jijo V Cherian; Nandan Deepak; Rajesh Prabhu Ponnusamy; Aravindh Somasundaram; V Jayanthi
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.