| Literature DB >> 27746589 |
Sha Xia1, Gan Chen1, Bo Wang1, Yujing Yin1, Zhenwei Sun1, Jingxiang Zhao1, Penglong Li1, Lian Zhao1, Hong Zhou1.
Abstract
RBCs undergo numerous changes during storage and stored RBCs may induce adverse effects, ultimately resulting in organ injury in transfusion recipients. We tested the hypothesis that the addition of SP to stored RBCs would improve the quality of the stored RBCs and mitigate liver injury after transfusion in a murine model. RBCs were harvested from C57BL/6J mice and stored for 14 days in CPDA-1 containing either a solution of SP in saline or saline alone. Haemolysis, the 24-hour posttransfusion recovery, the oxygen-carrying capacity, and the SOD activity of stored RBCs were evaluated. The plasma biochemistry, hepatic MDA level, MPO activity, IL-6, TNF-α concentrations, and histopathology were measured two hours after the transfusion of stored RBCs. Compared with RBCs stored in CPDA-1 and saline, the addition of SP to stored RBCs restored their oxygen-carrying capacity and SOD activity, reduced the AST activity, BUN concentrations, and LDH activity in the plasma, and decreased the MDA level, MPO activity, and concentrations of IL-6 and TNF-α in the liver. These data indicate that the addition of SP to RBCs during storage has a beneficial effect on storage lesions in vitro and subsequently alleviates liver injury after the transfusion of stored RBCs in vivo.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27746589 PMCID: PMC5056311 DOI: 10.1155/2016/3549207
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mediators Inflamm ISSN: 0962-9351 Impact factor: 4.711
Blood gas of the RBCs after 14 days of storage (n = 4).
| Index | Control group | SP group |
|---|---|---|
| pO2 (mmHg) | 77.5 ± 3.9 | 78.4 ± 2.4 |
| pCO2 (mmHg) | 134 ± 5.3 | 140 ± 5.1 |
| sO2 (%) | 48.6 ± 2.0 | 44.7 ± 1.8 |
| CHb (g/dL) | 24.12 ± 1.3 | 23.8 ± 1.2 |
| Hct (%) | 73.8 ± 3.9 | 72.7 ± 2.6 |
| Na+ (mmol/L) | 91.5 ± 2.0 | 92.1 ± 1.6 |
| Cl− (mmol/L) | 78.3 ± 2.8 | 79.3 ± 1.4 |
| Lactate (mmol/L) | 25.1 ± 0.7 | 27.0 ± 0.6 |
p < 0.05 versus the control group.
Figure 1P 50 values in two groups (n = 4). The data are plotted as the means ± SD. p < 0.05 versus the control group.
Figure 2SOD activities of the two groups (n = 4). The data are plotted as the means ± SD. p < 0.05 versus the control group.
Figure 3Plasma AST activity, BUN concentration, and LDH activity. (a) Plasma AST activity. (b) Plasma BUN concentration. (c) Plasma LDH activity. The data are plotted as the means ± SD (n = 10). p < 0.05 versus the control group.
Figure 4MDA and MPO levels in the livers of the two groups. (a) Liver MDA concentration of the two groups (n = 10). (b) Liver MPO activity of the two groups (n = 10). The data are plotted as the means ± SD. p < 0.05 versus the control group.
Figure 5Levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in liver of the two groups. (a) Liver IL-6 levels of the two groups (n = 10). (b) Liver TNF-α levels of the two groups (n = 10). The data are plotted as the means ± SD. p < 0.05 versus the control group.
Figure 6Liver histology. (a and b) Representative haematoxylin-and-eosin-stained images of liver tissues from both groups. (c) Quantification analysis of inflammatory cell infiltration in liver. Data are plotted as the means ± SD. p < 0.05 versus the control group. The foci of inflammation cell infiltration are indicated by an arrow.