Literature DB >> 27746386

Multisite reliability of MR-based functional connectivity.

Stephanie Noble1, Dustin Scheinost2, Emily S Finn3, Xilin Shen2, Xenophon Papademetris4, Sarah C McEwen5, Carrie E Bearden5, Jean Addington6, Bradley Goodyear7, Kristin S Cadenhead8, Heline Mirzakhanian8, Barbara A Cornblatt9, Doreen M Olvet9, Daniel H Mathalon10, Thomas H McGlashan11, Diana O Perkins11, Aysenil Belger12, Larry J Seidman13, Heidi Thermenos13, Ming T Tsuang8, Theo G M van Erp14, Elaine F Walker15, Stephan Hamann15, Scott W Woods11, Tyrone D Cannon16, R Todd Constable2.   

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed an increasing number of multisite MRI functional connectivity (fcMRI) studies. While multisite studies provide an efficient way to accelerate data collection and increase sample sizes, especially for rare clinical populations, any effects of site or MRI scanner could ultimately limit power and weaken results. Little data exists on the stability of functional connectivity measurements across sites and sessions. In this study, we assess the influence of site and session on resting state functional connectivity measurements in a healthy cohort of traveling subjects (8 subjects scanned twice at each of 8 sites) scanned as part of the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS). Reliability was investigated in three types of connectivity analyses: (1) seed-based connectivity with posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), right motor cortex (RMC), and left thalamus (LT) as seeds; (2) the intrinsic connectivity distribution (ICD), a voxel-wise connectivity measure; and (3) matrix connectivity, a whole-brain, atlas-based approach to assessing connectivity between nodes. Contributions to variability in connectivity due to subject, site, and day-of-scan were quantified and used to assess between-session (test-retest) reliability in accordance with Generalizability Theory. Overall, no major site, scanner manufacturer, or day-of-scan effects were found for the univariate connectivity analyses; instead, subject effects dominated relative to the other measured factors. However, summaries of voxel-wise connectivity were found to be sensitive to site and scanner manufacturer effects. For all connectivity measures, although subject variance was three times the site variance, the residual represented 60-80% of the variance, indicating that connectivity differed greatly from scan to scan independent of any of the measured factors (i.e., subject, site, and day-of-scan). Thus, for a single 5min scan, reliability across connectivity measures was poor (ICC=0.07-0.17), but increased with increasing scan duration (ICC=0.21-0.36 at 25min). The limited effects of site and scanner manufacturer support the use of multisite studies, such as NAPLS, as a viable means of collecting data on rare populations and increasing power in univariate functional connectivity studies. However, the results indicate that aggregation of fcMRI data across longer scan durations is necessary to increase the reliability of connectivity estimates at the single-subject level.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27746386      PMCID: PMC5322153          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  68 in total

1.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Integrated Intensity and Point-Feature Nonrigid Registration.

Authors:  Xenophon Papademetris; Andrea P Jackowski; Robert T Schultz; Lawrence H Staib; James S Duncan
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2001-09-02

3.  Alterations in Anatomical Covariance in the Prematurely Born.

Authors:  Dustin Scheinost; Soo Hyun Kwon; Cheryl Lacadie; Betty R Vohr; Karen C Schneider; Xenophon Papademetris; R Todd Constable; Laura R Ment
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Test-retest and between-site reliability in a multicenter fMRI study.

Authors:  Lee Friedman; Hal Stern; Gregory G Brown; Daniel H Mathalon; Jessica Turner; Gary H Glover; Randy L Gollub; John Lauriello; Kelvin O Lim; Tyrone Cannon; Douglas N Greve; Henry Jeremy Bockholt; Aysenil Belger; Bryon Mueller; Michael J Doty; Jianchun He; William Wells; Padhraic Smyth; Steve Pieper; Seyoung Kim; Marek Kubicki; Mark Vangel; Steven G Potkin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Test-retest reliability of graph metrics of resting state MRI functional brain networks: A review.

Authors:  Martina Andellini; Vittorio Cannatà; Simone Gazzellini; Bruno Bernardi; Antonio Napolitano
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 6.  Neural network models of schizophrenia.

Authors:  R E Hoffman; T H McGlashan
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.519

7.  Functional connectivity and brain networks in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Mary-Ellen Lynall; Danielle S Bassett; Robert Kerwin; Peter J McKenna; Manfred Kitzbichler; Ulrich Muller; Ed Bullmore
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Functional System and Areal Organization of a Highly Sampled Individual Human Brain.

Authors:  Timothy O Laumann; Evan M Gordon; Babatunde Adeyemo; Abraham Z Snyder; Sung Jun Joo; Mei-Yen Chen; Adrian W Gilmore; Kathleen B McDermott; Steven M Nelson; Nico U F Dosenbach; Bradley L Schlaggar; Jeanette A Mumford; Russell A Poldrack; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  BOLD responses reflecting dopaminergic signals in the human ventral tegmental area.

Authors:  Kimberlee D'Ardenne; Samuel M McClure; Leigh E Nystrom; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Reliability and reproducibility of individual differences in functional connectivity acquired during task and resting state.

Authors:  Lubdha M Shah; Justin A Cramer; Michael A Ferguson; Rasmus M Birn; Jeffrey S Anderson
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.708

View more
  56 in total

1.  Functional connectivity of specific resting-state networks predicts trust and reciprocity in the trust game.

Authors:  Gabriele Bellucci; Tim Hahn; Gopikrishna Deshpande; Frank Krueger
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Cross-paradigm connectivity: reliability, stability, and utility.

Authors:  Hengyi Cao; Oliver Y Chen; Sarah C McEwen; Jennifer K Forsyth; Dylan G Gee; Carrie E Bearden; Jean Addington; Bradley Goodyear; Kristin S Cadenhead; Heline Mirzakhanian; Barbara A Cornblatt; Ricardo E Carrión; Daniel H Mathalon; Thomas H McGlashan; Diana O Perkins; Aysenil Belger; Heidi Thermenos; Ming T Tsuang; Theo G M van Erp; Elaine F Walker; Stephan Hamann; Alan Anticevic; Scott W Woods; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 3.978

3.  Cluster failure or power failure? Evaluating sensitivity in cluster-level inference.

Authors:  Stephanie Noble; Dustin Scheinost; R Todd Constable
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-12-15       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Connectome-based predictive modeling of attention: Comparing different functional connectivity features and prediction methods across datasets.

Authors:  Kwangsun Yoo; Monica D Rosenberg; Wei-Ting Hsu; Sheng Zhang; Chiang-Shan R Li; Dustin Scheinost; R Todd Constable; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Toward Leveraging Human Connectomic Data in Large Consortia: Generalizability of fMRI-Based Brain Graphs Across Sites, Sessions, and Paradigms.

Authors:  Hengyi Cao; Sarah C McEwen; Jennifer K Forsyth; Dylan G Gee; Carrie E Bearden; Jean Addington; Bradley Goodyear; Kristin S Cadenhead; Heline Mirzakhanian; Barbara A Cornblatt; Ricardo E Carrión; Daniel H Mathalon; Thomas H McGlashan; Diana O Perkins; Aysenil Belger; Larry J Seidman; Heidi Thermenos; Ming T Tsuang; Theo G M van Erp; Elaine F Walker; Stephan Hamann; Alan Anticevic; Scott W Woods; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Salience network connectivity and social processing in children with nonverbal learning disability or autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Amy E Margolis; David Pagliaccio; Lauren Thomas; Sarah Banker; Rachel Marsh
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Development of Hippocampal-Prefrontal Cortex Interactions through Adolescence.

Authors:  Finnegan J Calabro; Vishnu P Murty; Maria Jalbrzikowski; Brenden Tervo-Clemmens; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Multivariate approaches improve the reliability and validity of functional connectivity and prediction of individual behaviors.

Authors:  Kwangsun Yoo; Monica D Rosenberg; Stephanie Noble; Dustin Scheinost; R Todd Constable; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Intraclass correlation: Improved modeling approaches and applications for neuroimaging.

Authors:  Gang Chen; Paul A Taylor; Simone P Haller; Katharina Kircanski; Joel Stoddard; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft; Melissa A Brotman; Robert W Cox
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Improved estimation of subject-level functional connectivity using full and partial correlation with empirical Bayes shrinkage.

Authors:  Amanda F Mejia; Mary Beth Nebel; Anita D Barber; Ann S Choe; James J Pekar; Brian S Caffo; Martin A Lindquist
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.