Literature DB >> 27746085

The incidence, risk factors, and outcomes associated with late right-sided heart failure in patients supported with an axial-flow left ventricular assist device.

Jonathan D Rich1, Igor Gosev2, Chetan B Patel3, Susan Joseph4, Jason N Katz5, Peter M Eckman6, Sangjin Lee7, Kartik Sundareswaran8, Ahmet Kilic9, Brian Bethea10, Behzad Soleimani11, Brian Lima12, Nir Uriel13, Michael Kiernan14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early right-sided heart failure (RHF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is associated with increased mortality, but little is known about patients who develop late RHF (LRHF). We evaluated the incidence, risk factors, and clinical impact of LRHF in patients supported by axial-flow LVADs.
METHODS: Data were analyzed from 537 patients enrolled in the HeartMate II (HM II; Thoratec/St. Jude) destination therapy clinical trial. LRHF was defined as the development of clinical RHF accompanied by the need for inotropic support occurring more than 30 days after discharge from the index LVAD implant hospitalization. Clinical variables, quality of life, rehospitalizations, and survival were compared between patients with and without LRHF.
RESULTS: LRHF developed in 41 patients (8%), with a median time to LRHF of 480 days. A higher preoperative blood urea nitrogen and increased central venous pressure-to-pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio were independent predictors of LRHF. The Michigan and HMII RHF risk scores were both associated with an increased likelihood of LRHF (p < 0.05). Patients with LRHF had worse quality of life according to the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (61 ± 26 vs 70 ± 21; p < 0.05), poorer functional capacity by 6-minute walk distance (275 ± 189 m vs 312 ± 216 m; p < 0.05), and more rehospitalizations (6 vs 3; p < 0.001). LRHF was associated with decreased survival (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: LRHF is an important complication in patients with LVADs and is associated with worse quality of life, reduced functional capacity, more frequent hospitalizations, and worse survival compared with those without LRHF.
Copyright © 2016 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HeartMate II; death; late right-sided heart failure; left ventricular assist device; mechanical circulatory support; outcomes; predictors

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27746085     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  20 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary Perspectives in Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support: What Did We Learn in the Last 3 Years?

Authors:  Jayant Raikhelkar; Nir Uriel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Clinical implications of hemodynamic assessment during left ventricular assist device therapy.

Authors:  Teruhiko Imamura; Ben Chung; Ann Nguyen; Gabriel Sayer; Nir Uriel
Journal:  J Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Comparative Analysis of Established Risk Scores and Novel Hemodynamic Metrics in Predicting Right Ventricular Failure in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients.

Authors:  Anthony E Peters; LaVone A Smith; Priscilla Ababio; Khadijah Breathett; Timothy L McMurry; Jamie L W Kennedy; Mohammad Abuannadi; James Bergin; Sula Mazimba
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 5.712

4.  Right Heart Failure Following Left Ventricular Device Implantation: Natural History, Risk Factors, and Outcomes: An Analysis of the STS INTERMACS Database.

Authors:  Chris J Kapelios; Lars H Lund; Omar Wever-Pinzon; Craig H Selzman; Susan L Myers; Ryan S Cantor; Josef Stehlik; Themistocles Chamogeorgakis; Stephen H McKellar; Antigone Koliopoulou; Rami Alharethi; Abdallah G Kfoury; Michael Bonios; Stamatis Adamopoulos; Edward M Gilbert; James C Fang; James K Kirklin; Stavros G Drakos
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 10.447

5.  Optimal Hemodynamics During Left Ventricular Assist Device Support Are Associated With Reduced Readmission Rates.

Authors:  Teruhiko Imamura; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Gene Kim; Jayant Raikhelkar; Nitasha Sarswat; Sara Kalantari; Bryan Smith; Daniel Rodgers; Stephanie Besser; Ben Chung; Ann Nguyen; Nikhil Narang; Takeyoshi Ota; Tae Song; Colleen Juricek; Mandeep Mehra; Maria Rosa Costanzo; Ulrich P Jorde; Daniel Burkhoff; Gabriel Sayer; Nir Uriel
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 6.  Advancements in mechanical circulatory support for patients in acute and chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Thomas A Csepe; Ahmet Kilic
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Understanding Longitudinal Changes in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Authors:  Gaurav Gulati; Robin Ruthazer; David Denofrio; Amanda R Vest; David Kent; Michael S Kiernan
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 5.712

8.  Outcomes With Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor Use After Left Ventricular Assist Device: An STS-INTERMACS Analysis.

Authors:  E Wilson Grandin; Gaurav Gulati; Jose I Nunez; Kevin Kennedy; J Eduardo Rame; Pavan Atluri; Francis D Pagani; James K Kirklin; Robert L Kormos; Jeffrey Teuteberg; Michael S Kiernan
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 10.447

Review 9.  HVAD Flow Waveform Morphologies: Theoretical Foundation and Implications for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Jonathan D Rich; Daniel Burkhoff
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

10.  Trimedazidine alleviates pulmonary artery banding-induced acute right heart dysfunction and activates PRAS40 in rats.

Authors:  Yunshan Cao; Jiyang Song; Shutong Shen; Heling Fu; Xiang Li; Ying Xu; Aqian Wang; Xinli Li; Min Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-09-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.