Literature DB >> 27745916

Pay for performance in the inpatient sector: A review of 34 P4P programs in 14 OECD countries.

Ricarda Milstein1, Jonas Schreyoegg2.   

Abstract

Across the member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), pay-for-performance (P4P) programs have been implemented in the inpatient sector to improve the quality of care provided by hospitals. This paper provides an overview of 34 existing P4P programs in the inpatient sector in 14 OECD countries based on a structured literature search in five databases to identify relevant sources in Danish, English, French, German, Hebrew, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Norwegian, Spanish, Swedish and Turkish. It assembles information on the design and effects of these P4P systems and discusses whether evaluations of such programs allow preliminary conclusions to be drawn about the effects of P4P. The programs are very heterogeneous in their aim, the selection of indicators and the design of financial rewards. The impact of P4P is unclear and it may be that the moderately positive effects seen for some programs can be attributed to side effects, such as public reporting and increased awareness of data recording. Policy makers must decide whether the potential benefits of introducing a P4P program outweigh the potential risks within their particular national or regional context, and should be aware that P4P programs have yet not lived up to expectations.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Hospital; Pay-for-performance; Provider payment; Quality of care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27745916     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  25 in total

1.  Measuring, Reporting, and Rewarding Quality of Care in 5 Nations: 5 Policy Levers to Enhance Hospital Quality Accountability.

Authors:  Christoph Pross; Alexander Geissler; Reinhard Busse
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 2.  Dimensions of Quality and Their Increasing Relevance for Visceral Medicine in Germany.

Authors:  Wolfram Keßler; Claus-Dieter Heidecke
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-03-30

3.  Endorsing performance measures is a matter of trust.

Authors:  Dharmvir S Jaswal; Charles Natanson; Peter Q Eichacker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-02-23

4.  Antibiotic prophylaxis as a quality of care indicator: does it help in the fight against surgical site infections following fragility hip fractures?

Authors:  Tal Frenkel Rutenberg; Anat Aizer; Avraham Levi; Noa Naftali; Shelly Zeituni; Steven Velkes; Anat Aka Zohar
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Pay for performance system in Turkey and the world; a global overview.

Authors:  İbrahim Tayfun Şahiner; Ebru Esen; Ahmet Deniz Uçar; Ahmet Serdar Karaca; Ahmet Çınar Yastı
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2022-03-28

6.  Assessing Taiwan's pay-for-performance program for diabetes care: a cost-benefit net value approach.

Authors:  Jui-Fen Rachel Lu; Ying Isabel Chen; Karen Eggleston; Chih-Hung Chen; Brian Chen
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2022-08-22

Review 7.  Hospital funding reforms in Canada: a narrative review of Ontario and Quebec strategies.

Authors:  Maude Laberge; Francesca Katherine Brundisini; Myriam Champagne; Imtiaz Daniel
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2022-06-27

8.  Stakeholder Assessment of Evidence-Based Guideline Dissemination and Implementation in a Dental Group Practice.

Authors:  I Gruß; D J Pihlstrom; C D Kaplan; N Yosuf; J L Fellows; E G Guerrero; D E Polk
Journal:  JDR Clin Trans Res       Date:  2020-02-10

9.  Relative contributions of hospital versus skilled nursing facility quality on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Paula Chatterjee; Mingyu Qi; Rachel Werner
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 10.  The impact of financial incentives on the implementation of asthma or diabetes self-management: A systematic review.

Authors:  Tracy Jackson; Michael D Shields; Liam G Heaney; Marilyn Kendall; Christina J Pearce; Chi Yan Hui; Hilary Pinnock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.