Jürgen Böhm1, Frank Pianka2, Nina Stüttgen2, Junghyun Rho3, Biljana Gigic2, Yuzheng Zhang3, Nina Habermann4, Petra Schrotz-King5, Clare Abbenhardt-Martin5, Lin Zielske5, Paul D Lampe3, Alexis Ulrich2, Markus K Diener2, Cornelia M Ulrich6. 1. Huntsman Cancer Institute and Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT. 2. Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 3. Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA. 4. Genome Biology, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, German Cancer Research Center and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany. 5. Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany. 6. Huntsman Cancer Institute and Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT. Electronic address: neli.ulrich@hci.utah.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ventral incisional hernia is the most common long-term complication after an abdominal operation. Among newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients, we screened the preoperative plasma proteome to explore predictive markers for the development of an incisional hernia. METHODS: We utilized preoperative plasma samples of 72 newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients who underwent midline incision for tumor resection between 2010 and 2013. A total of 21 patients with incisional hernia occurrence were matched with 51 patients with at least 18 months follow-up without an incisional hernia by sex, age, and body mass index. To assess predictive markers of incisional hernia risk, we screened the plasma proteome for >2,000 distinct proteins using a well-validated antibody microarray test. Paired t tests were used to compare protein levels between cases and controls. A gene-set-enrichment analysis (Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) was applied to test for differences in signaling pathways between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The proteome screen identified 25 proteins that showed elevated or reduced plasma levels in the hernia group compared to the control group (nominal P values < .05). Several proteins were in pathways associated with wound healing (CCL21, SHBG, BRF2) or cell adhesion (PCDH15, CDH3, EPCAM). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that there are multiple individual and groups of plasma proteins that could feasibly predict the personal hernia risk prior to undergoing an operation. Further investigations in larger, independent sample sets are warranted to replicate findings and validate clinical utility of potential biomarkers. After validation, such a biomarker could be incorporated into a multifactorial risk model to guide clinical decision-making.
BACKGROUND: Ventral incisional hernia is the most common long-term complication after an abdominal operation. Among newly diagnosed colorectal cancerpatients, we screened the preoperative plasma proteome to explore predictive markers for the development of an incisional hernia. METHODS: We utilized preoperative plasma samples of 72 newly diagnosed colorectal cancerpatients who underwent midline incision for tumor resection between 2010 and 2013. A total of 21 patients with incisional hernia occurrence were matched with 51 patients with at least 18 months follow-up without an incisional hernia by sex, age, and body mass index. To assess predictive markers of incisional hernia risk, we screened the plasma proteome for >2,000 distinct proteins using a well-validated antibody microarray test. Paired t tests were used to compare protein levels between cases and controls. A gene-set-enrichment analysis (Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) was applied to test for differences in signaling pathways between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The proteome screen identified 25 proteins that showed elevated or reduced plasma levels in the hernia group compared to the control group (nominal P values < .05). Several proteins were in pathways associated with wound healing (CCL21, SHBG, BRF2) or cell adhesion (PCDH15, CDH3, EPCAM). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that there are multiple individual and groups of plasma proteins that could feasibly predict the personal hernia risk prior to undergoing an operation. Further investigations in larger, independent sample sets are warranted to replicate findings and validate clinical utility of potential biomarkers. After validation, such a biomarker could be incorporated into a multifactorial risk model to guide clinical decision-making.
Authors: Matthew F Buas; Jung-hyun Rho; Xiaoyu Chai; Yuzheng Zhang; Paul D Lampe; Christopher I Li Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2015-08-30 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Christopher T Aquina; Aaron S Rickles; Christian P Probst; Kristin N Kelly; Andrew-Paul Deeb; John R T Monson; Fergal J Fleming Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: David Parés; Awad Shamali; Sam Stefan; Karen Flashman; Daniel O'Leary; John Conti; Asha Senapati; Amjad Parvaiz; Jim Khan Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: J R Salameh; Ladawn M Talbott; Warren May; Bashar Gosheh; Parminder J S Vig; D Olga McDaniel Journal: Am Surg Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: Yu Tian; Ming Lu; Weiming Yue; Lin Li; Shuhai Li; Cun Gao; Libo Si; Lei Qi; Wensi Hu; Hui Tian Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-03-17 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Cornelia M Ulrich; Biljana Gigic; Graham A Colditz; Jane C Figueiredo; William M Grady; Christopher I Li; David Shibata; Erin M Siegel; Adetunji T Toriola; Alexis Ulrich; Jürgen Böhm; Jennifer Ose; Richard Viskochil; Martin Schneider Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2018-12-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: C Stabilini; M A Garcia-Urena; F Berrevoet; D Cuccurullo; S Capoccia Giovannini; M Dajko; L Rossi; K Decaestecker; M López Cano Journal: Hernia Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: Jolantha Beyerle; Andreana N Holowatyj; Mariam Haffa; Eva Frei; Biljana Gigic; Petra Schrotz-King; Juergen Boehm; Nina Habermann; Marie Stiborova; Dominique Scherer; Torsten Kölsch; Stephanie Skender; Nikolaus Becker; Esther Herpel; Martin Schneider; Alexis Ulrich; Peter Schirmacher; Jenny Chang-Claude; Hermann Brenner; Michael Hoffmeister; Ulrike Haug; Robert W Owen; Cornelia M Ulrich Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Mahmoud Delphan; Tengda Lin; David B Liesenfeld; Johanna Nattenmüller; Jürgen T Böhm; Biljana Gigic; Nina Habermann; Lin Zielske; Petra Schrotz-King; Martin Schneider; Alexis Ulrich; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Cornelia M Ulrich; Jennifer Ose Journal: Metabolomics Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 4.290
Authors: Xiaoliang Wang; Ali Shojaie; Yuzheng Zhang; David Shelley; Paul D Lampe; Lisa Levy; Ulrike Peters; John D Potter; Emily White; Johanna W Lampe Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 3.240