Literature DB >> 27745685

Designing and Undertaking a Health Economics Study of Digital Health Interventions.

Paul McNamee1, Elizabeth Murray2, Michael P Kelly3, Laura Bojke4, Jim Chilcott5, Alastair Fischer6, Robert West7, Lucy Yardley8.   

Abstract

This paper introduces and discusses key issues in the economic evaluation of digital health interventions. The purpose is to stimulate debate so that existing economic techniques may be refined or new methods developed. The paper does not seek to provide definitive guidance on appropriate methods of economic analysis for digital health interventions. This paper describes existing guides and analytic frameworks that have been suggested for the economic evaluation of healthcare interventions. Using selected examples of digital health interventions, it assesses how well existing guides and frameworks align to digital health interventions. It shows that digital health interventions may be best characterized as complex interventions in complex systems. Key features of complexity relate to intervention complexity, outcome complexity, and causal pathway complexity, with much of this driven by iterative intervention development over time and uncertainty regarding likely reach of the interventions among the relevant population. These characteristics imply that more-complex methods of economic evaluation are likely to be better able to capture fully the impact of the intervention on costs and benefits over the appropriate time horizon. This complexity includes wider measurement of costs and benefits, and a modeling framework that is able to capture dynamic interactions among the intervention, the population of interest, and the environment. The authors recommend that future research should develop and apply more-flexible modeling techniques to allow better prediction of the interdependency between interventions and important environmental influences.
Copyright © 2016 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27745685     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  20 in total

Review 1.  Health behavior models for informing digital technology interventions for individuals with mental illness.

Authors:  John A Naslund; Kelly A Aschbrenner; Sunny Jung Kim; Gregory J McHugo; Jürgen Unützer; Stephen J Bartels; Lisa A Marsch
Journal:  Psychiatr Rehabil J       Date:  2017-02-09

Review 2.  Economic Evaluations of Internet-Based Psychological Interventions for Anxiety Disorders and Depression: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lauren M Mitchell; Udita Joshi; Vikram Patel; Chunling Lu; John A Naslund
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 4.839

3.  Digital interventions in mental health: evidence syntheses and economic modelling.

Authors:  Lina Gega; Dina Jankovic; Pedro Saramago; David Marshall; Sarah Dawson; Sally Brabyn; Georgios F Nikolaidis; Hollie Melton; Rachel Churchill; Laura Bojke
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Assessing costs of developing a digital program for training community health workers to deliver treatment for depression: A case study in rural India.

Authors:  Udita Joshi; John A Naslund; Aditya Anand; Deepak Tugnawat; Ram Vishwakarma; Anant Bhan; Vikram Patel; Chunling Lu
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.222

5.  Developing and Evaluating Digital Interventions to Promote Behavior Change in Health and Health Care: Recommendations Resulting From an International Workshop.

Authors:  Susan Michie; Lucy Yardley; Robert West; Kevin Patrick; Felix Greaves
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Using an internet intervention to support self-management of low back pain in primary care: findings from a randomised controlled feasibility trial (SupportBack).

Authors:  Adam W A Geraghty; Rosie Stanford; Beth Stuart; Paul Little; Lisa C Roberts; Nadine E Foster; Jonathan C Hill; Elaine M Hay; David Turner; Wansida Malakan; Linda Leigh; Lucy Yardley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Qualitative process study to explore the perceived burdens and benefits of a digital intervention for self-managing high blood pressure in Primary Care in the UK.

Authors:  Katherine Morton; Laura Dennison; Katherine Bradbury; Rebecca Jane Band; Carl May; James Raftery; Paul Little; Richard J McManus; Lucy Yardley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Protecting the Mental Health of Small-to-Medium Enterprise Owners: A Randomized Control Trial Evaluating a Self-Administered Versus Telephone Supported Intervention.

Authors:  Angela Martin; Michelle Kilpatrick; Jenn Scott; Fiona Cocker; Sarah Dawkins; Paula Brough; Kristy Sanderson
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.162

Review 9.  Conducting Value for Money Analyses for Non-randomised Interventional Studies Including Service Evaluations: An Educational Review with Recommendations.

Authors:  Matthew Franklin; James Lomas; Gerry Richardson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  The NICE Evidence Standards Framework for digital health and care technologies - Developing and maintaining an innovative evidence framework with global impact.

Authors:  Harriet Unsworth; Bernice Dillon; Lucie Collinson; Helen Powell; Mark Salmon; Tosin Oladapo; Lynda Ayiku; Gary Shield; Joanne Holden; Neelam Patel; Mark Campbell; Felix Greaves; Indra Joshi; John Powell; Alexia Tonnel
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2021-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.