Literature DB >> 27744397

Limited Reliability of Radiographic Assessment of Sacroiliac Joints in Patients with Suspected Early Spondyloarthritis.

Alice Ashouri Christiansen1,2, Oliver Hendricks3,4, Dorota Kuettel3,4, Kim Hørslev-Petersen3,4, Anne Grethe Jurik3,4, Steen Nielsen3,4, Kaspar Rufibach3,4, Anne Gitte Loft3,4, Susanne Juhl Pedersen3,4, Louise Thuesen Hermansen3,4, Mikkel Østergaard3,4, Bodil Arnbak3,4, Claus Manniche3,4, Ulrich Weber3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the reproducibility of evaluation of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) radiographs among readers with varying levels of experience, and to identify potential drivers of disagreement in classification among 5 predefined radiographic lesion types.
METHODS: The study sample consisted of 104 consecutive patients aged 18-40 with low back pain ≥ 3 months of duration who met the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) definition for a positive SIJ magnetic resonance image, or were HLA-B27-positive and had ≥ 1 spondyloarthritis (SpA)-related clinical/laboratory feature according to the ASAS classification criteria for axial SpA. Seven blinded readers (2 musculoskeletal radiologists, 5 rheumatologists) classified pelvic radiographs according to the modified New York criteria (mNY) and recorded presence/absence of 5 lesion types in both SIJ: erosion, sclerosis, ankylosis, joint space widening, and joint space narrowing. Reproducibility of mNY classification among 21 reader pairs was assessed and potential drivers of disagreement were identified among 5 lesion types. A generalized linear mixed logistic regression model served to analyze to what extent discordance in lesion type was associated with discrepant mNY classification.
RESULTS: Mean κ values (percent concordance) were 0.39 (84.1%) for mNY classification over 21 reader pairs, 0.46 (79.8%) between 2 musculoskeletal radiologists, and 0.55 (86.5%) and 0.36 (77.9%) between the most experienced rheumatologist and the 2 radiologists. Erosion showed the lowest agreement (25%) among patients with discordant classification and gave the highest OR of 13.5 for disagreement.
CONCLUSION: Reproducibility of radiographic SIJ classification in an SpA inception cohort was only fair to at best moderate among 7 readers with varying levels of experience, questioning the applicability of mNY in early SpA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  INTERREADER AGREEMENT; MODIFIED NEW YORK CRITERIA; RADIOGRAPHIC SACROILIITIS; SPONDYLOARTHRITIS

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27744397     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.160079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  10 in total

Review 1.  Ankylosing spondylitis and axial spondyloarthritis: recent insights and impact of new classification criteria.

Authors:  Fabian Proft; Denis Poddubnyy
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 5.346

2.  Sacroiliac joint in sarcoidosis on computed tomography: a monocentric retrospective study (SISTER).

Authors:  Simon Cadiou; Guillaume Coiffier; Stéphane Jouneau; Patrick Jego; Aleth Perdriger; Nicolas Belhomme; Raphaël Guillin; Pascal Guggenbuhl
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 3.  Improving the design of RCTs in non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Walter P Maksymowych; Robert G W Lambert; Liron Caplan; Filip E van den Bosch; Mikkel Østergaard
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 32.286

Review 4.  Imaging in Axial Spondyloarthritis: What is Relevant for Diagnosis in Daily Practice?

Authors:  Ulrich Weber; Anne Grethe Jurik; Robert G W Lambert; Walter P Maksymowych
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 5.  The role of imaging in the diagnosis and management of axial spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Walter P Maksymowych
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 20.543

6.  No radiographic sacroiliitis progression was observed in patients with early spondyloarthritis at 6 years: results of the Esperanza multicentric prospective cohort.

Authors:  Cristina Fernández-Carballido; Carolina Tornero; M Carmen Castro-Villegas; Eva Galindez; José Francisco García-Llorente; María Luz García-Vivar; Beatriz Joven-Ibáñez; Xavier Juanola; Claudia Urrego-Laurín; Clementina López-Medina; Raquel Almodovar; Nieves Martínez-Alberola; Teresa Ruiz-Jimeno; Eugenio de Miguel
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2020-09

7.  Deep learning for detection of radiographic sacroiliitis: achieving expert-level performance.

Authors:  Keno K Bressem; Janis L Vahldiek; Lisa Adams; Stefan Markus Niehues; Hildrun Haibel; Valeria Rios Rodriguez; Murat Torgutalp; Mikhail Protopopov; Fabian Proft; Judith Rademacher; Joachim Sieper; Martin Rudwaleit; Bernd Hamm; Marcus R Makowski; Kay-Geert Hermann; Denis Poddubnyy
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 5.156

Review 8.  MRI for diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis: major advance with critical limitations 'Not everything that glisters is gold (standard)'.

Authors:  Cédric Lukas; Catherine Cyteval; Maxime Dougados; Ulrich Weber
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2018-01-12

9.  Axial spondyloarthritis 10 years on: still looking for the lost tribe.

Authors:  Rosemarie Barnett; Thomas Ingram; Raj Sengupta
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 7.580

10.  Similar biologic drug response regardless of radiographic status in axial spondyloarthritis: data from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register in Ankylosing Spondylitis registry.

Authors:  Xabier Michelena; Sizheng Steven Zhao; Sayam Dubash; Linda E Dean; Gareth T Jones; Helena Marzo-Ortega
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 7.580

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.