Literature DB >> 27744155

Non-target screening and prioritization of potentially persistent, bioaccumulating and toxic domestic wastewater contaminants and their removal in on-site and large-scale sewage treatment plants.

Kristin M Blum1, Patrik L Andersson2, Gunno Renman3, Lutz Ahrens4, Meritxell Gros4, Karin Wiberg4, Peter Haglund2.   

Abstract

On-site sewage treatment facilities (OSSFs), which are used to reduce nutrient emissions in rural areas, were screened for anthropogenic compounds with two-dimensional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC×GC-MS). The detected compounds were prioritized based on their persistence, bioaccumulation, ecotoxicity, removal efficiency, and concentrations. This comprehensive prioritization strategy, which was used for the first time on OSSF samples, ranked galaxolide, α-tocopheryl acetate, octocrylene, 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyn-4,7-diol, several chlorinated organophosphorus flame retardants and linear alkyl benzenes as the most relevant compounds being emitted from OSSFs. Twenty-six target analytes were then selected for further removal efficiency analysis, including compounds from the priority list along with substances from the same chemical classes, and a few reference compounds. We found significantly better removal of two polar contaminants 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyn-4,7-diol (p=0.0003) and tris(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate (p=0.005) in soil beds, a common type of OSSF in Sweden, compared with conventional sewage treatment plants. We also report median removal efficiencies in OSSFs for compounds not studied in this context before, viz. α-tocopheryl acetate (96%), benzophenone (83%), 2-(methylthio)benzothiazole (64%), 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyn-4,7-diol (33%), and a range of organophosphorus flame retardants (19% to 98%). The environmental load of the top prioritized compounds in soil bed effluents were in the thousands of nanogram per liter range, viz. 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyn-4,7-diol (3000ngL-1), galaxolide (1400ngL-1), octocrylene (1200ngL-1), and α-tocopheryl acetate (660ngL-1).
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decentralized sewage treatment; Non-target analysis; Organic micropollutants; Ranking; Removal efficiencies; Two-dimensional gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27744155     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

1.  Use of Passive and Grab Sampling and High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry for Non-Targeted Analysis of Emerging Contaminants and Their Semi-Quantification in Water.

Authors:  Đorđe Tadić; Rayana Manasfi; Marine Bertrand; Andrés Sauvêtre; Serge Chiron
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.927

2.  Using Estrogenic Activity and Nontargeted Chemical Analysis to Identify Contaminants in Sewage Sludge.

Authors:  Gabrielle P Black; Guochun He; Michael S Denison; Thomas M Young
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Effect-based assessment of recipient waters impacted by on-site, small scale, and large scale waste water treatment facilities - combining passive sampling with in vitro bioassays and chemical analysis.

Authors:  Anna Kjerstine Rosenmai; Johan Lundqvist; Pablo Gago-Ferrero; Geeta Mandava; Lutz Ahrens; Karin Wiberg; Agneta Oskarsson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Concentrations of pharmaceuticals and other micropollutants in groundwater downgradient from large on-site wastewater discharges.

Authors:  Sarah M Elliott; Melinda L Erickson; Aliesha L Krall; Byron A Adams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.