Literature DB >> 27743058

Partial or total open meniscectomy? : A prospective, randomized study.

Adam Hede1, Niels Hejgaard1, Eilif Larsen1.   

Abstract

In order to compare partial with total meniscectomy a prospective clinical study of 200 patients was carried out. At arthrotomy 100 patients were allocated to each type of operation. The two groups did not differ in duration of symptoms, age distribution, or sex ratio. The operations were performed as conventional arthrotomies. One hundred and ninety two of the patients were seen at follow up 2 and 12 months after operation. There was no difference in the period off work between the two groups. One year after operation, 6 of the 98 patients treated with partial meniscectomy had undergone further operation. In all posterior tears were found at both procedures. Among the 94 patients undergoing total meniscectomy, 4 required further operation. In each, part of the posterior horn had been left at the primary procedure. One year after operation significantly more patients who had undergone partial meniscectomy had been relieved of symptoms. However, the two groups did not show any difference in the degree of radiological changes present.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Open meniscectomy; partial; total

Year:  1986        PMID: 27743058     DOI: 10.1007/BF00267750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  24 in total

1.  A simple meniscectomy.

Authors:  J C Hughston
Journal:  J Sports Med       Date:  1975 Jul-Aug

2.  Knee joint changes after meniscectomy.

Authors:  T J FAIRBANK
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1948-11

3.  Mechanical changes in the knee after meniscectomy.

Authors:  W R Krause; M H Pope; R J Johnson; D G Wilder
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Factors effecting late results after meniscectomy.

Authors:  R J Johnson; D B Kettelkamp; W Clark; P Leaverton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Late results after meniscectomy.

Authors:  E M Tapper; N W Hoover
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-04       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Degenerative changes in the knee after meniscectomy.

Authors:  J P Jackson
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1968-06-01

7.  Endoscopic partial and total meniscectomy. A comparative study with a short term follow up.

Authors:  J Gillquist; P Hamberg; J Lysholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1982-12

8.  Closed meniscectomy.

Authors:  J W Goodfellow
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1983-08

9.  The microvasculature of the meniscus and its response to injury. An experimental study in the dog.

Authors:  S P Arnoczky; R F Warren
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1983 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Suture of new and old peripheral meniscus tears.

Authors:  P Hamberg; J Gillquist; J Lysholm
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Rehabilitation following arthroscopic meniscectomy.

Authors:  D M St-Pierre
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Does varus alignment increase after medial meniscectomy?

Authors:  Kyoung Ho Yoon; Sang Hak Lee; Dae Kyung Bae; Soo Yeon Park; Hoon Oh
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The long term outcome of open total and partial meniscectomy related to the quantity and site of the meniscus removed.

Authors:  A Hede; E Larsen; H Sandberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.075

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.