R Seidel1, K Zukowski2, A Wree3, M Schulze3. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, HELIOS Medical Center Schwerin, Wismarsche Straße 393-7, 19049, Schwerin, Germany. ronald.seidel@helios-kliniken.de. 2. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, HELIOS Medical Center Schwerin, Wismarsche Straße 393-7, 19049, Schwerin, Germany. 3. Institut of Anatomy, Medical University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound-guided blocks of the cervical plexus are established anesthetic procedures for carotid endarterectomy. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study tested the hypothesis that an additional ultrasound-guided periarterial injection of local anesthetic leads to a lower frequency of periarterial supplementation by the surgeon. METHODS:A total of 40 patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups. In both groups an ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block (20 ml of 0.75 % ropivacaine) at the level of the fourth cervical vertebra was performed. In a second step, the needle was inserted from posterolateral to anteromedial (in-plane technique) relative to the internal carotid artery and then, depending on the randomized group assignment, 5 ml of 0.75 % ropivacaine (group 2) or 5 ml of 0.9 % saline (group 1) was injected. The parameters investigated included the need for supplementation, patient comfort, the incidence of side effects and circulatory changes. RESULTS: The two groups did not significantly differ (p = 0.459) in terms of the need for intraoperative supplementation with 1 % prilocaine with a mean (range) in group 2 of 4.9 ml (0-20 ml), in group 1 of 3.7 ml (0-16 ml) and patient comfort (p = 0.144). In addition, a trend towards a higher complication rate was observed in group 2. CONCLUSION: For ultrasound-guided intermediate blocks of the cervical plexus, an additional periarterial infiltration showed no advantage. Abandoning this technique leads to a relevant simplification of the blocking technique and tends to reduce block-related side effects.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound-guided blocks of the cervical plexus are established anesthetic procedures for carotid endarterectomy. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study tested the hypothesis that an additional ultrasound-guided periarterial injection of local anesthetic leads to a lower frequency of periarterial supplementation by the surgeon. METHODS: A total of 40 patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups. In both groups an ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block (20 ml of 0.75 % ropivacaine) at the level of the fourth cervical vertebra was performed. In a second step, the needle was inserted from posterolateral to anteromedial (in-plane technique) relative to the internal carotid artery and then, depending on the randomized group assignment, 5 ml of 0.75 % ropivacaine (group 2) or 5 ml of 0.9 % saline (group 1) was injected. The parameters investigated included the need for supplementation, patient comfort, the incidence of side effects and circulatory changes. RESULTS: The two groups did not significantly differ (p = 0.459) in terms of the need for intraoperative supplementation with 1 % prilocaine with a mean (range) in group 2 of 4.9 ml (0-20 ml), in group 1 of 3.7 ml (0-16 ml) and patient comfort (p = 0.144). In addition, a trend towards a higher complication rate was observed in group 2. CONCLUSION: For ultrasound-guided intermediate blocks of the cervical plexus, an additional periarterial infiltration showed no advantage. Abandoning this technique leads to a relevant simplification of the blocking technique and tends to reduce block-related side effects.
Authors: A L Calderon; P Zetlaoui; F Benatir; J Davidson; O Desebbe; N Rahali; C Truc; P Feugier; P Lermusiaux; B Allaouchiche; E Boselli Journal: Anaesthesia Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 6.955
Authors: T Steinfeldt; P Kessler; O Vicent; U Schwemmer; J Döffert; P Lang; D Mathioudakis; E Hüttemann; W Armbruster; S Sujatta; M Lange; S Weber; F Reisig; R Hillmann; T Volk; T Wiesmann Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 1.041