Literature DB >> 27742888

In vivo variation in same-day estimates of metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 binding using [11C]ABP688 and [18F]FPEB.

Christine DeLorenzo1,2,3, Jean-Dominique Gallezot4, John Gardus1, Jie Yang5, Beata Planeta4, Nabeel Nabulsi4, R Todd Ogden3, David C Labaree4, Yiyun H Huang4, J John Mann3, Fabrizio Gasparini6, Xin Lin3,7, Jonathan A Javitch3,7,8, Ramin V Parsey1,2,9, Richard E Carson4,10, Irina Esterlis4,11.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography tracers [11C]ABP688 and [18F]FPEB target the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 providing quantification of the brain glutamatergic system in vivo. Previous [11C]ABP688 positron emission tomography human test-retest studies indicate that, when performed on the same day, significant binding increases are observed; however, little deviation is reported when scans are >7 days apart. Due to the small cohorts examined previously (eight and five males, respectively), we aimed to replicate the same-day test-retest studies in a larger cohort including both males and females. Results confirmed large within-subject binding differences (ranging from -23% to 108%), suggesting that measurements are greatly affected by study design. We further investigated whether this phenomenon was specific to [11C]ABP688. Using [18F]FPEB and methodology that accounts for residual radioactivity from the test scan, four subjects were scanned twice on the same day. In these subjects, binding estimates increased between 5% and 39% between scans. Consistent with [11C]ABP688, mean absolute test-retest variability was previously reported as <12% when scans were >21 days apart. This replication study and pilot extension to [18F]FPEB suggest that observed within-day binding variation may be due to characteristics of mGluR5; for example, diurnal variation in mGluR5 may affect measurement of this receptor.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Positron emission tomography; [11C]ABP688; [18F]FPEB; metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5; test–retest

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27742888      PMCID: PMC5536783          DOI: 10.1177/0271678X16673646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab        ISSN: 0271-678X            Impact factor:   6.200


  57 in total

1.  In vivo positron emission tomography imaging with [¹¹C]ABP688: binding variability and specificity for the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 in baboons.

Authors:  Christine DeLorenzo; Matthew S Milak; Kathleen G Brennan; J S Dileep Kumar; J John Mann; Ramin V Parsey
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Test-retest stability of cerebral mGluR₅ quantification using [¹¹C]ABP688 and positron emission tomography in rats.

Authors:  David Elmenhorst; Antonio Aliaga; Andreas Bauer; Pedro Rosa-Neto
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  Evaluation of a bolus/infusion protocol for 11C-ABP688, a PET tracer for mGluR5.

Authors:  Cyrill Burger; Alexandra Deschwanden; Simon Ametamey; Anass Johayem; Bruno Mancosu; Matthias Wyss; Gregor Hasler; Alfred Buck
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Age-related diurnal effect on D2 receptor binding: a preliminary PET study.

Authors:  Simon Cervenka; Christer Halldin; Lars Farde
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 5.176

5.  Increase in sympathetic outflow by paraventricular nucleus stimulation in awake rats.

Authors:  H Kannan; Y Hayashida; H Yamashita
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1989-06

6.  Diurnal variation of cerebral blood flow in rat hippocampus.

Authors:  Y Endo; K Jinnai; M Endo; K Fujita; F Kimura
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 7.  Potential psychiatric applications of metabotropic glutamate receptor agonists and antagonists.

Authors:  John H Krystal; Sanjay J Mathew; D Cyril D'Souza; Amir Garakani; Handan Gunduz-Bruce; Dennis S Charney
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.749

8.  Species differences in mGluR5 binding sites in mammalian central nervous system determined using in vitro binding with [18F]F-PEB.

Authors:  Shil Patel; Terence G Hamill; Brett Connolly; Elaine Jagoda; Wenping Li; Raymond E Gibson
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 2.408

9.  Studies of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 radioligand [¹¹C]ABP688 with N-acetylcysteine challenge in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Christine M Sandiego; Nabeel Nabulsi; Shu-Fei Lin; David Labaree; Soheila Najafzadeh; Yiyun Huang; Kelly Cosgrove; Richard E Carson
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.562

10.  Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 negative modulation in phase I clinical trial: potential impact of circadian rhythm on the neuropsychiatric adverse reactions-do hallucinations matter?

Authors:  Khalid Abou Farha; Richard Bruggeman; Corine Baljé-Volkers
Journal:  ISRN Psychiatry       Date:  2014-03-04
View more
  22 in total

1.  Characterization of [11C]PXT012253 as a PET Radioligand for mGlu4 Allosteric Modulators in Nonhuman Primates.

Authors:  Akihiro Takano; Sangram Nag; Zhisheng Jia; Mahabuba Jahan; Anton Forsberg; Ryosuke Arakawa; Per Grybäck; Guillaume Duvey; Christer Halldin; Delphine Charvin
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Alterations in sleep, sleep spindle, and EEG power in mGluR5 knockout mice.

Authors:  David D Aguilar; Robert E Strecker; Radhika Basheer; James M McNally
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Measuring the effects of ketamine on mGluR5 using [18F]FPEB and PET.

Authors:  Sophie E Holmes; Jean-Dominique Gallezot; Margaret T Davis; Nicole DellaGioia; David Matuskey; Nabeel Nabulsi; John H Krystal; Jonathan A Javitch; Christine DeLorenzo; Richard E Carson; Irina Esterlis
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 4.  Using molecular imaging to understand early schizophrenia-related psychosis neurochemistry: a review of human studies.

Authors:  Christin Schifani; Sina Hafizi; Tania Da Silva; Jeremy Joseph Watts; M Saad Khan; Romina Mizrahi
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017-12-08

5.  Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5 and Glutamate Involvement in Major Depressive Disorder: A Multimodal Imaging Study.

Authors:  Chadi G Abdallah; Jonas Hannestad; Graeme F Mason; Sophie E Holmes; Nicole DellaGioia; Gerard Sanacora; Lihong Jiang; David Matuskey; Ritvij Satodiya; Fabrizio Gasparini; Xin Lin; Jonathan Javitch; Beata Planeta; Nabeel Nabulsi; Richard E Carson; Irina Esterlis
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-04-06

Review 6.  Metabotropic Glutamatergic Receptor 5 and Stress Disorders: Knowledge Gained From Receptor Imaging Studies.

Authors:  Irina Esterlis; Sophie E Holmes; Priya Sharma; John H Krystal; Christine DeLorenzo
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  Dysregulation of Decision Making Related to Metabotropic Glutamate 5, but Not Midbrain D3, Receptor Availability Following Cocaine Self-administration in Rats.

Authors:  Stephanie M Groman; Ansel T Hillmer; Heather Liu; Krista Fowles; Daniel Holden; Evan D Morris; Daeyeol Lee; Jane R Taylor
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Relative Strengths of Three Linearizations of Receptor Availability: Saturation, Inhibition, and Occupancy Plots.

Authors:  Javad Khodaii; Mostafa Araj-Khodaei; Manouchehr S Vafaee; Dean F Wong; Albert Gjedde
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Longitudinal imaging of metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors during early and extended alcohol abstinence.

Authors:  Ansel T Hillmer; Gustavo A Angarita; Irina Esterlis; Jon Mikael Anderson; Nabeel Nabulsi; Keunpoong Lim; Jim Ropchan; Richard E Carson; John H Krystal; Stephanie S O' Malley; Kelly P Cosgrove
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Noninvasive Relative Quantification of [11C]ABP688 PET Imaging in Mice Versus an Input Function Measured Over an Arteriovenous Shunt.

Authors:  Jeroen Verhaeghe; Daniele Bertoglio; Lauren Kosten; David Thomae; Marleen Verhoye; Annemie Van Der Linden; Leonie Wyffels; Sigrid Stroobants; John Wityak; Celia Dominguez; Ladislav Mrzljak; Steven Staelens
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.