German Cediel1,2, Maribel Gonzalez-Del-Hoyo1,2, Anna Carrasquer1,2, Rafael Sanchez3, Carme Boqué2,4, Alfredo Bardají1,2. 1. Department of Cardiology, Joan XXIII University Hospital, Tarragona, Spain. 2. Pere Virgili Health Research Institute, Rovira i Virgili University, Tarragona, Spain. 3. Department of Clinical Analysis, Joan XXIII University Hospital, Tarragona, Spain. 4. Emergency Department, Joan XXIII University Hospital, Tarragona, Spain.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify patients with type 2 myocardial infarction (MI) and patients with non-ischaemic myocardial injury (NIMI) and to compare their prognosis with those of patients with type 1 MI. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed in 1010 patients admitted to the emergency department of a university hospital with at least one troponin I test between 2012 and 2013. Participants were identified using laboratory records and divided into three groups: type 1 MI (rupture of atheromatous plaque), type 2 MI (imbalance between myocardial oxygen supply and/or demand) and NIMI (patients who did not meet diagnostic criteria for type 1 or type 2 MI). Clinical characteristics and 2-year outcomes were analysed. RESULTS: Patients with type 2 MI and NIMI were older, with higher proportion of women and more comorbidities than patients with type 1 MI. Absolute mortality and the adjusted risk for all-cause mortality in both groups were significantly higher than that of patients with type 1 MI (39.7%, HR: 1.41 95% CI 1.02 to 1.94, p=0.038 and 40.0%, HR: 1.54 95% CI 1.16 to 2.04, p=0.002, respectively). Patients with type 2 MI and NIMI tended to present more readmissions due to heart failure (16.5%, HR: 1.55 95% CI 0.87 to 2.76, p=0.133 and 12.3%, HR: 1.15 95% CI 0.70 to 1.90, p=0.580) and less readmission rates due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) than patients with type 1 MI (2.1%, HR: 0.11 95% CI 0.04 to 0.31, p<0.001 and 4.3%, HR: 0.22 95% CI 0.12 to 0.41, p<0.001), CONCLUSIONS: Patients diagnosed with type 2 MI and NIMI have higher rates of mortality and lower readmission rates for ACS compared with patients with type 1 MI. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
OBJECTIVE: To identify patients with type 2 myocardial infarction (MI) and patients with non-ischaemic myocardial injury (NIMI) and to compare their prognosis with those of patients with type 1 MI. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed in 1010 patients admitted to the emergency department of a university hospital with at least one troponin I test between 2012 and 2013. Participants were identified using laboratory records and divided into three groups: type 1 MI (rupture of atheromatous plaque), type 2 MI (imbalance between myocardial oxygen supply and/or demand) and NIMI (patients who did not meet diagnostic criteria for type 1 or type 2 MI). Clinical characteristics and 2-year outcomes were analysed. RESULTS:Patients with type 2 MI and NIMI were older, with higher proportion of women and more comorbidities than patients with type 1 MI. Absolute mortality and the adjusted risk for all-cause mortality in both groups were significantly higher than that of patients with type 1 MI (39.7%, HR: 1.41 95% CI 1.02 to 1.94, p=0.038 and 40.0%, HR: 1.54 95% CI 1.16 to 2.04, p=0.002, respectively). Patients with type 2 MI and NIMI tended to present more readmissions due to heart failure (16.5%, HR: 1.55 95% CI 0.87 to 2.76, p=0.133 and 12.3%, HR: 1.15 95% CI 0.70 to 1.90, p=0.580) and less readmission rates due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) than patients with type 1 MI (2.1%, HR: 0.11 95% CI 0.04 to 0.31, p<0.001 and 4.3%, HR: 0.22 95% CI 0.12 to 0.41, p<0.001), CONCLUSIONS:Patients diagnosed with type 2 MI and NIMI have higher rates of mortality and lower readmission rates for ACS compared with patients with type 1 MI. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Authors: Simon A Mahler; Jason P Stopyra; Fred S Apple; Robert F Riley; Gregory B Russell; Brian C Hiestand; James W Hoekstra; Cedric W Lefebvre; Bret A Nicks; David M Cline; Kim L Askew; David M Herrington; Gregory L Burke; Chadwick D Miller Journal: Clin Biochem Date: 2017-01-10 Impact factor: 3.281
Authors: Kris G Vargas; Paul M Haller; Bernhard Jäger; Maximilian Tscharre; Ronald K Binder; Christian Mueller; Bertil Lindahl; Kurt Huber Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Mark Mariathas; Rick Allan; Sanjay Ramamoorthy; Bartosz Olechowski; Jonathan Hinton; Martin Azor; Zoe Nicholas; Alison Calver; Simon Corbett; Michael Mahmoudi; John Rawlins; Iain Simpson; James Wilkinson; Chun Shing Kwok; Paul Cook; Mamas A Mamas; Nick Curzen Journal: BMJ Date: 2019-03-13
Authors: Hanumantha R Jogu; Sameer Arora; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Arman Qamar; Ambarish Pandey; Parag A Chevli; Tusharkumar H Pansuriya; Muhammad I Ahmad; Abhishek Dutta; Padageshwar R Sunkara; Waqas Qureshi; Sujethra Vasu; Bharathi Upadhya; Deepak L Bhatt; James L Januzzi; David Herrington Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Maribel González-Del-Hoyo; Germán Cediel; Anna Carrasquer; Gil Bonet; Karla Vásquez-Nuñez; Carme Boqué; Samuel Alí; Alfredo Bardají Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2019-03-26 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Christopher Reid; Ahmed Alturki; Andrew Yan; Derek So; Dennis Ko; Jean-Francois Tanguay; Amal Bessissow; Shamir Mehta; Shaun Goodman; Thao Huynh Journal: CJC Open Date: 2020-02-24