| Literature DB >> 27742647 |
Heidi Hirsch1,2, Isabell Hensen2,3, Karsten Wesche3,4, Daniel Renison5, Catherina Wypior2, Matthias Hartmann6, Henrik von Wehrden7,8.
Abstract
Introduced plants often face new environmental conditions in their non-native ranges. To become invasive, they need to overcome several biotic and abiotic filters that may trigger adaptive changes in life-history traits, like post-germination processes. Such early life cycle traits may play a crucial role in the colonization and establishment success of invasive plants. As a previous study revealed that seeds of non-native populations of the woody Siberian elm, Ulmus pumila, germinated faster than those of native populations, we expected growth performance of seedlings to mirror this finding. Here, we conducted a common garden greenhouse experiment using different temperature and watering treatments to compare the biomass production of U. pumila seedlings derived from 7 native and 13 populations from two non-native ranges. Our results showed that under all treatments, non-native populations were characterized by higher biomass production and enhanced resource allocation to aboveground biomass compared to the native populations. The observed enhanced growth performance of non-native populations might be one of the contributing factors for the invasion success of U. pumila due to competitive advantages during the colonization of new sites.Entities:
Keywords: Biomass; Ulmus pumila; genetic shift; greenhouse; post-germination traits; shoot-root ratio
Year: 2017 PMID: 27742647 PMCID: PMC5206335 DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plw071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AoB Plants Impact factor: 3.276
Figure 1Sampled localities of Ulmus pumila populations in the non-native ranges (A: U.S. and B: Argentina) and in the native range (C and D: China). Population locations are indicated by gray triangles. AZ , Arizona; CO, Colorado; NM, New Mexico; UT, Utah; WY, Wyoming.
Number of Ulmus pumila individuals (Nind) per range at the beginning and at the end of the greenhouse experiment. The starting number consists of the number of populations tested for the corresponding range (Npop) * 2 temperatures * 3 water treatment levels * 8 replicates. The difference between the starting number and the number of individuals at the end of the experiment characterizes the number of individuals which did not survive the experiment (Nind_dead).
| Range | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| China (native) | 7 | 336 | 305 | 31 |
| Argentina (non-native) | 6 | 288 | 273 | 15 |
| U.S. (non-native) | 7 | 336 | 332 | 4 |
| Sum | 20 | 960 | 910 | 50 |
Analysis of variance (type III) results comparing the minimal generalized linear mixed models. The results show the influence of the temperature and water treatment as well as the population origins (range) on the aboveground and belowground biomass production as well as on the biomass ratio (df , degrees of freedom; temp., temperature; treatm., treatment). Rows with no entries characterize interactions that were removed during the model reduction process.
| Source of variance | Aboveground biomass | Belowground biomass | Biomass ratio | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d | d | d | |||||||||
| Intercept | 103.17 | 1 | <0.001 | 415.50 | 1 | <0.001 | 7.00 | 1 | 0.008 | ||
| Temp. treat. | 30.56 | 1 | <0.001 | 13.23 | 1 | <0.001 | 58.90 | 1 | <0.001 | ||
| Water treat. | 60.01 | 2 | <0.001 | 1.03 | 2 | 0.596 | 144.61 | 2 | <0.001 | ||
| Range | 41.93 | 2 | <0.001 | 23.58 | 2 | <0.001 | 29.88 | 2 | <0.001 | ||
| Temp. × water treat. | 15.47 | 2 | <0.001 | 18.17 | 2 | <0.001 | |||||
| Temp. treat. × range | 36.61 | 2 | <0.001 | ||||||||
| Water treat. × range | 11.27 | 4 | 0.024 | ||||||||
| Temp. treat × water treat. × range | |||||||||||
Figure 2Dry aboveground (A) and dry belowground (B) biomass of native and non-native Ulmus pumila populations by temperature and water treatments (med = medium). For a statistical analysis of the data see Table 2.
Figure 3Interaction plots of mean dry aboveground biomass (A) and mean dry belowground biomass (B) of Ulmus pumila in response to the temperature and water treatments.
Figure 4Shoot–root ratios of native and non-native Ulmus pumila populations in response to temperature and water treatments (med = medium). For a statistical analysis of the data see Table 2.
Figure 5Interaction plots of mean shoot-root ratio in response to temperature (A) and water treatments (B).