Literature DB >> 27742492

Accuracy of Acoustic Analysis Measurements in the Evaluation of Patients With Different Laryngeal Diagnoses.

Leonardo Wanderley Lopes1, Layssa Batista Simões2, Jocélio Delfino da Silva2, Deyverson da Silva Evangelista2, Ana Celiane da Nóbrega E Ugulino3, Priscila Oliveira Costa Silva2, Vinícius Jefferson Dias Vieira4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the accuracy of acoustic measures in discriminating between patients with different laryngeal diagnoses. STUDY
DESIGN: The study design is descriptive, cross-sectional, and retrospective.
METHODS: A total of 279 female patients participated in the research. Acoustic measures of the mean and standard deviation (SD) values of the fundamental frequency (F0), jitter, shimmer, and glottal to noise excitation (GNE) were extracted from the emission of the vowel /ε/.
RESULTS: Isolated acoustic measures do not demonstrate adequate performance in discriminating patients with and without laryngeal alteration. The combination of GNE, SD of the F0, jitter, and shimmer improved the ability to classify patients with and without laryngeal alteration. In isolation, the SD of the F0, shimmer, and GNE presented acceptable performance in discriminating individuals with different laryngeal diagnoses. The combination of acoustic measurements caused discrete improvement in performance of the classifier to discriminate healthy larynx vs vocal polyp (SD of the F0, shimmer, and GNE), healthy larynx vs unilateral vocal fold paralysis (SD of the F0 and jitter), healthy larynx vs vocal nodules (SD of the F0 and jitter), healthy larynx vs sulcus vocalis (SD of the F0 and shimmer), and healthy larynx vs voice disorder due to gastroesophageal reflux (F0 mean, jitter, and shimmer).
CONCLUSIONS: Isolated acoustic measures do not demonstrate adequate performance in discriminating patients with and without laryngeal alteration, although they present acceptable performance in classifying different laryngeal diagnoses. Combined acoustic measures present an acceptable capacity to discriminate between the presence and the absence of laryngeal alteration and to differentiate several laryngeal diagnoses.
Copyright © 2017 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Acoustic analysis; Larynx; Voice; Voice disorder

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27742492     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  4 in total

1.  Exploring the feasibility of the combination of acoustic voice quality index and glottal function index for voice pathology screening.

Authors:  Nora Ulozaite-Staniene; Tadas Petrauskas; Viktoras Šaferis; Virgilijus Uloza
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Voice Disorder Detection via an m-Health System: Design and Results of a Clinical Study to Evaluate Vox4Health.

Authors:  Ugo Cesari; Giuseppe De Pietro; Elio Marciano; Ciro Niri; Giovanna Sannino; Laura Verde
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Evaluation of vocal changes after vestibular rehabilitation in patients with balance disorders.

Authors:  Maria Caçador; Ana Papoila; Carlos Brás-Geraldes; Carlos Stapleton Garcia; Tânia Constantino; Mafalda Almeida; Pedro Stapleton-Garcia; João Paço
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.354

4.  Performance of the phonatory deviation diagram in the evaluation of rough and breathy synthesized voices.

Authors:  Leonardo Wanderley Lopes; Jonas Almeida de Freitas; Anna Alice Almeida; Priscila Oliveira Costa Silva; Giorvan Ânderson Dos Santos Alves
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.