Literature DB >> 2774232

Effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia on systemic hemodynamic function and systemic oxygen supply-demand relationship.

K Reinhart1, U Foehring, T Kersting, M Schaefer, D Bredle, A Hirner, K Eyrich.   

Abstract

The effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) on total body oxygen supply-demand ratio are complex due to potential influences on both O2 delivery (QO2) and consumption (VO2). One hundred and five patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery were randomly assigned to one of three groups to compare the cardiovascular and metabolic responses associated with (1) thoracic epidural anesthesia plus light general anesthesia (group TEA); (2) general anesthesia with halothane (group H); and (3) neuroleptanalgesia (group NLA). Values of cardiac index (CI) and QO2 were less intraoperatively in the TEA group than in the H or NLA groups, while VO2 values were similar. VO2 during recovery was greater in both the TEA and NLA groups than in the H group. Consequently the oxygen supply-demand ratio (QO2/VO2) was less in the TEA group throughout the perioperative period and about 30% below baseline values during early recovery. At comparable VO2, CI and mixed venous O2 saturation were always less in the TEA group than in the NLA group. Heart rate was slowest intraoperatively during TEA, and stroke work was less with TEA than with NLA. As cardiac filling pressure and systemic vascular resistance did not differ among the three groups, reduced adaptation of CI to tissue O2 needs during TEA was attributed to negative inotropic and chronotropic effects of the sympathetic blockade. We conclude that in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery, TEA has no apparent advantage over general anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2774232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

Review 1.  Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials.

Authors:  A Rodgers; N Walker; S Schug; A McKee; H Kehlet; A van Zundert; D Sage; M Futter; G Saville; T Clark; S MacMahon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-16

Review 2.  [Cardioprotection by thoracic epidural anesthesia? : meta-analysis].

Authors:  A Gauss; S K Jahn; L H J Eberhart; W Stahl; M Rockemann; M Georgieff; F Wagner; R Meierhenrich
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Neuraxial blockade for the prevention of postoperative mortality and major morbidity: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Peter Choi; Santhanam Suresh; Natalie Albert; Sandra Kopp; Nathan Leon Pace
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-01-25

Review 4.  Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid-based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Sandra Kopp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-05

Review 5.  Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, vomiting and pain after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Mina Nishimori; Sandra Kopp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-16

6.  Effect of anaesthesia on the perioperative outcomes of pelvi-acetabular fracture surgeries in the apex trauma centre of a developing country-a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Naveen Yadav; Suma Rabab Ahmad; Nisha Saini; Babita Gupta; Chhavi Sawhney; Rakesh Garg; Vijay Sharma; Vivek Trikha
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2015-07-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.