Literature DB >> 27742239

The Significance of the Interleaflet Triangles in Determining the Morphology of Congenitally Abnormal Aortic Valves: Implications for Noninvasive Imaging and Surgical Management.

Justin T Tretter1, Diane E Spicer2, Shumpei Mori3, Sathish Chikkabyrappa4, Andrew N Redington5, Robert H Anderson6.   

Abstract

A comprehensive understanding of the normal and abnormal aortic root is paramount if we are to improve not only our assessment of the aortic root and its components but also the surgical approach to reconstructing this complex structure when congenitally malformed. Most anatomic and imaging-based classifications of the normal root recognize and describe the basic components, which include the shape and size of the three aortic sinuses and their three valvar leaflets, as well as the sinutubular junction and proximal ascending aorta. However, the three interposing fibrous interleaflet triangles, which share an intimate relationship with all elements of the root, are often ignored. In consequence, the important role the interleaflet triangles play in determining the function of the normal and congenitally malformed aortic root is underappreciated. Additionally, the subtle asymmetries found in the normal aortic root, such as differences between the sizes of the described components, underlie its hemodynamic efficiency. In this review the authors describe the complex structure of the normal aortic root, contrasting these normal characteristics with those found in the unicuspid and bicuspid variants of congenitally malformed aortic valves. Many of these features are readily recognizable using current imaging modalities and so should become a standard part of the description of aortic valvar disease. The authors believe that this thorough morphologic approach will provide a framework for the re-creation of a more normal aortic root at the time of repair or replacement, thereby improving current outcomes. Copyright Â
© 2016 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic regurgitation; Aortic root; Aortic stenosis; Aortic valve; Bicuspid aortic valve; Unicuspid aortic valve

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27742239     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2016.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  5 in total

1.  Development and maturation of the fibrous components of the arterial roots in the mouse heart.

Authors:  Rachel Richardson; Lorraine Eley; Charlotte Donald-Wilson; Jonathon Davis; Natasha Curley; Ahlam Alqahtani; Lindsay Murphy; Robert H Anderson; Deborah J Henderson; Bill Chaudhry
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Unicuspid Aortic Valve Presenting with Decompensated Critical Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Eunice Yang; Madeline Schiminger; Jose A Madrazo
Journal:  CASE (Phila)       Date:  2018-06-18

3.  Anatomical predictors of conduction damage after transcatheter implantation of the aortic valve.

Authors:  Justin T Tretter; Shumpei Mori; Robert H Anderson; Michael D Taylor; Nicholas Ollberding; Vien Truong; Joseph Choo; Dean Kereiakes; Wojciech Mazur
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2019-04-09

Review 4.  What is the real cardiac anatomy?

Authors:  Shumpei Mori; Justin T Tretter; Diane E Spicer; David L Bolender; Robert H Anderson
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 2.414

5.  The aortic valve with two leaflets.

Authors:  Justin T Tretter; Diane E Spicer; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Robert H Anderson
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-10-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.