| Literature DB >> 27741261 |
Nele A J De Witte1, Stefan Sütterlin2,3, Caroline Braet4, Sven C Mueller1.
Abstract
Emotion regulation and associated autonomic activation develop throughout childhood and adolescence under the influence of the family environment. Specifically, physiological indicators of autonomic nervous system activity such as interoceptive sensitivity and vagally mediated heart rate variability (HRV) can inform on emotion regulation. Although the effect of parental emotion socialization on emotion regulation appears to be influenced by autonomic processes, research on physiological regulation and the influence of parental factors remains scarce. This study investigated the relationship between self-reported habitual emotion regulation strategies and HRV at rest as well as interoceptive sensitivity in forty-six youngsters (27 female; age: M = 13.00, SD = 2.13). Secondly, the association between these autonomic correlates and parental psychopathology was also studied. Whereas better interoceptive sensitivity was related to reduced maladaptive emotion regulation, specifically rumination, high HRV was related to more use of external emotion regulation strategies (i.e., support seeking). In addition, increased HRV and decreased interoceptive sensitivity were associated with maternal internalizing and there was evidence for a possible mediation effect of HRV in the relationship between maternal internalizing and child external emotion regulation. This study elucidates the link between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and underlying physiological regulation in adolescents but also indicates a putative influence of maternal internalizing symptoms on emotion regulation in their offspring.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27741261 PMCID: PMC5065133 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164615
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Study sample characteristics (n = 46).
| Mean ( | Range (min-max) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 13.00 (2.13) | 9–16 |
| Ratio Female/male | 27/19 | |
| Interoceptive sensitivity | .56 (.20) | .08–1.00 |
| Interoceptive certainty | 5.25 (1.81) | 1.33–9.00 |
| Heart rate variability | ||
| • RMSSD | 61.38 (33.84) | 9.61–188.08 |
| • RMSSD (log10) | 1.73 (.23) | 0.98–2.27 |
| • High frequency | 1925.58 (2388.10) | 36.07–12580.84 |
| • High frequency (log10) | 3.04 (.50) | 1.56–4.10 |
| Pubertal development score | 1.64 (.77) | 0.33–3.33 |
| Habitual emotion regulation (FEEL-KJ) | ||
| • Adaptive emotion regulation | 137.15 (24.08) | 76–181 |
| • Maladaptive emotion regulation | 75.43 (15.32) | 37–113 |
| • External emotion regulation | 55.28 (11.21) | 34–80 |
| Internalizing symptoms (HADS) | ||
| • Mother | 8.76 (5.71) | 0–22 |
| • Father | 7.40 (5.04) | 0–25 |
Partial correlations between interoceptive sensitivity and heart rate variability and ER strategies and parental internalizing.
| Interoceptive sensitivity ( | Heart rate variability ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| RMSSD (log10) | HF (log10) | ||
| Adaptive ER | -.25 | .06 | .06 |
| Maladaptive ER | .11 | .06 | |
| External ER | -.10 | ||
| Maternal internalizing | |||
| Paternal internalizing | -.13 | -.21 | -.13 |
Significant correlations are presented in bold font. All correlations were controlled for gender and pubertal development, interoceptive sensitivity was additionally controlled for BMI and heart rate variability was additionally controlled for regular exercise.
*p < .05,
**p < .01.
Follow-up correlations between heart rate variability and the subscales of external emotion regulation.
| Heart rate variability | ||
|---|---|---|
| RMSSD (log10) | HF (log10) | |
| Support seeking | ||
| Expression | .23 | .21 |
| Emotional control | .04 | .06 |
All correlations were controlled for gender, puberty, and regular exercise. Significant correlations are presented in bold font. n = 45;
*p < .05;
Follow-up correlations between interoceptive sensitivity and the subscales of maladaptive emotion regulation.
| Interoceptive sensitivity | |
|---|---|
| Giving up | -.18 |
| Aggression | -.15 |
| Withdrawal | -.05 |
| Self-devaluation | |
| Rumination |
All correlations were corrected for puberty, BMI, and gender. Significant correlations are presented in bold font. N = 46;
*p < .05;
Fig 1Scatterplots depicting the significant correlations between parental internalizing symptoms and interoceptive sensitivity and heart rate variability (high frequency component) in the child.
While maternal internalizing symptoms were correlated with child autonomic components (left panes), this effect was absent for paternal internalizing symptoms (right panes). Bivariate correlations are shown for the purpose of clear visualization and interpretation.
Fig 2Visual representation of the significant indirect effect of maternal internalizing on external emotion regulation in the child through both measures of heart rate variability (the high frequency component and RMSSD).