Frederik Vandenberghe1, Núria Saigí-Morgui, Aurélie Delacrétaz, Lina Quteineh, Séverine Crettol, Nicolas Ansermot, Mehdi Gholam-Rezaee, Armin von Gunten, Philippe Conus, Chin B Eap. 1. aUnit of Pharmacogenetics and Clinical Psychopharmacology, Department of Psychiatry, Centre for Psychiatric Neuroscience bDepartment of Psychiatry, Center for Psychiatric Epidemiology and Psychopathology cDepartment of Psychiatry, Service of Old Age Psychiatry dDepartment of Psychiatry, Service of General Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital, Hospital of Cery, Prilly eDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Psychotropic drugs can induce significant (>5%) weight gain (WG) already after 1 month of treatment, which is a good predictor for major WG at 3 and 12 months. The large interindividual variability of drug-induced WG can be explained in part by genetic and clinical factors. AIM: The aim of this study was to determine whether extensive analysis of genes, in addition to clinical factors, can improve prediction of patients at risk for more than 5% WG at 1 month of treatment. METHODS: Data were obtained from a 1-year naturalistic longitudinal study, with weight monitoring during weight-inducing psychotropic treatment. A total of 248 Caucasian psychiatric patients, with at least baseline and 1-month weight measures, and with compliance ascertained were included. Results were tested for replication in a second cohort including 32 patients. RESULTS: Age and baseline BMI were associated significantly with strong WG. The area under the curve (AUC) of the final model including genetic (18 genes) and clinical variables was significantly greater than that of the model including clinical variables only (AUCfinal: 0.92, AUCclinical: 0.75, P<0.0001). Predicted accuracy increased by 17% with genetic markers (Accuracyfinal: 87%), indicating that six patients must be genotyped to avoid one misclassified patient. The validity of the final model was confirmed in a replication cohort. Patients predicted before treatment as having more than 5% WG after 1 month of treatment had 4.4% more WG over 1 year than patients predicted to have up to 5% WG (P≤0.0001). CONCLUSION: These results may help to implement genetic testing before starting psychotropic drug treatment to identify patients at risk of important WG.
BACKGROUND: Psychotropic drugs can induce significant (>5%) weight gain (WG) already after 1 month of treatment, which is a good predictor for major WG at 3 and 12 months. The large interindividual variability of drug-induced WG can be explained in part by genetic and clinical factors. AIM: The aim of this study was to determine whether extensive analysis of genes, in addition to clinical factors, can improve prediction of patients at risk for more than 5% WG at 1 month of treatment. METHODS: Data were obtained from a 1-year naturalistic longitudinal study, with weight monitoring during weight-inducing psychotropic treatment. A total of 248 Caucasian psychiatricpatients, with at least baseline and 1-month weight measures, and with compliance ascertained were included. Results were tested for replication in a second cohort including 32 patients. RESULTS: Age and baseline BMI were associated significantly with strong WG. The area under the curve (AUC) of the final model including genetic (18 genes) and clinical variables was significantly greater than that of the model including clinical variables only (AUCfinal: 0.92, AUCclinical: 0.75, P<0.0001). Predicted accuracy increased by 17% with genetic markers (Accuracyfinal: 87%), indicating that six patients must be genotyped to avoid one misclassified patient. The validity of the final model was confirmed in a replication cohort. Patients predicted before treatment as having more than 5% WG after 1 month of treatment had 4.4% more WG over 1 year than patients predicted to have up to 5% WG (P≤0.0001). CONCLUSION: These results may help to implement genetic testing before starting psychotropic drug treatment to identify patients at risk of important WG.
Authors: Maximilian G Gorelashvili; Oğuzhan Angay; Katherina Hemmen; Vanessa Klaus; David Stegner; Katrin G Heinze Journal: Haematologica Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Luis Alameda; Axel Levier; Mehdi Gholam-Rezaee; Philippe Golay; Frederik Vandenberghe; Aurélie Delacretaz; Philipp Baumann; Anaïs Glatard; Céline Dubath; Andres Herane-Vives; Victoria Rodriguez; Alessandra Solida; Kim Q Do; Chin B Eap; Philippe Conus Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-12-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rebecca N S Harrison; Fiona Gaughran; Robin M Murray; Sang Hyuck Lee; Jose Paya Cano; David Dempster; Charles J Curtis; Danai Dima; Hamel Patel; Simone de Jong; Gerome Breen Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-11-07 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Jaana Suvisaari; Outi Mantere; Jaakko Keinänen; Teemu Mäntylä; Eva Rikandi; Maija Lindgren; Tuula Kieseppä; Tuukka T Raij Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 4.157