Joshua H Baker1, Scott D Rothenberger2, Christopher E Kline3, Michele L Okun1,4. 1. a Department of Psychology , University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania. 2. b Department of Statistics , University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania. 3. c Department of Health and Physical Activity, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania. 4. d Biofrontiers Institute , University of Colorado , Colorado Springs , Colorado.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/ BACKGROUND:Pregnant women report disturbed sleep beginning in early pregnancy. Among nonpregnant populations, exercise has been associated with improved sleep; however, research in pregnant samples has been equivocal. We examined whether varying degrees of exercise were associated with better nocturnal sleep among pregnant women during early gestation. PARTICIPANTS: 172 pregnant women. METHODS:Self-reported sleep and exercise and objective sleep were collected during early gestation: T1 (10-12 weeks), T2 (14-16 weeks), and T3 (18-20 weeks) from 172 pregnant women. Exercise was categorized into three time-varying groups: 0 metabolic equivalent minutes per week (MET-min/week), 1 to < 500 MET-min/week, or ≥ 500 MET-min/week. Linear mixed-effects models were employed to test hypotheses. RESULTS: A significant main effect for Time (F[2,254] = 9.77, p < 0.0001) and Time*Exercise group interaction were observed for actigraphic sleep efficiency (aSE) (F[4,569] = 2.73, p = 0.0285). At T2, women who reported ≥ 500 MET-min/week had higher aSE than those who reported 0 MET-min/week. Significant main effects for Exercise Group and Time were observed for actigraphic wake after sleep onset (aWASO; F[2,694] = 3.04, p = 0.0483 and F[2,260] = 3.21, p = 0.0419). aWASO was lowest for those reporting 1 to < 500 MET-min/week (t[701] = 2.35, adjusted p = .0489) and aWASO decreased from T1 to T3 (t[258] = 2.53, adjusted p value = 0.036). Lastly, there was a main effect for Time for the PSQI (F[2,689] = 52.11, p < 0.0001), indicating that sleep quality improved over time. CONCLUSIONS: Some level of exercise among pregnant women appears to be more advantageous than no exercise at all. Moderate exercise, while still unclearly defined, may be a worthwhile adjunct treatment to combat sleep disturbances during pregnancy.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES/ BACKGROUND: Pregnant women report disturbed sleep beginning in early pregnancy. Among nonpregnant populations, exercise has been associated with improved sleep; however, research in pregnant samples has been equivocal. We examined whether varying degrees of exercise were associated with better nocturnal sleep among pregnant women during early gestation. PARTICIPANTS: 172 pregnant women. METHODS: Self-reported sleep and exercise and objective sleep were collected during early gestation: T1 (10-12 weeks), T2 (14-16 weeks), and T3 (18-20 weeks) from 172 pregnant women. Exercise was categorized into three time-varying groups: 0 metabolic equivalent minutes per week (MET-min/week), 1 to < 500 MET-min/week, or ≥ 500 MET-min/week. Linear mixed-effects models were employed to test hypotheses. RESULTS: A significant main effect for Time (F[2,254] = 9.77, p < 0.0001) and Time*Exercise group interaction were observed for actigraphic sleep efficiency (aSE) (F[4,569] = 2.73, p = 0.0285). At T2, women who reported ≥ 500 MET-min/week had higher aSE than those who reported 0 MET-min/week. Significant main effects for Exercise Group and Time were observed for actigraphic wake after sleep onset (aWASO; F[2,694] = 3.04, p = 0.0483 and F[2,260] = 3.21, p = 0.0419). aWASO was lowest for those reporting 1 to < 500 MET-min/week (t[701] = 2.35, adjusted p = .0489) and aWASO decreased from T1 to T3 (t[258] = 2.53, adjusted p value = 0.036). Lastly, there was a main effect for Time for the PSQI (F[2,689] = 52.11, p < 0.0001), indicating that sleep quality improved over time. CONCLUSIONS: Some level of exercise among pregnant women appears to be more advantageous than no exercise at all. Moderate exercise, while still unclearly defined, may be a worthwhile adjunct treatment to combat sleep disturbances during pregnancy.
Authors: Mohammmad Soltani; Mohammad R Haytabakhsh; Jake M Najman; Gail M Williams; Michael J O'Callaghan; William Bor; Kaeleen Dingle; Alexandra Clavarino Journal: Arch Womens Ment Health Date: 2012-05-15 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Léonie Uijtdewilligen; Geeske M E E Peeters; Jannique G Z van Uffelen; Jos W R Twisk; Amika S Singh; Wendy J Brown Journal: J Sci Med Sport Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 4.319
Authors: Christopher E Kline; Leah A Irish; Daniel J Buysse; Howard M Kravitz; Michele L Okun; Jane F Owens; Martica H Hall Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2014-10-29 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Leah A Irish; Christopher E Kline; Scott D Rothenberger; Robert T Krafty; Daniel J Buysse; Howard M Kravitz; Joyce T Bromberger; Huiyong Zheng; Martica H Hall Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2014-04
Authors: Paul D Loprinzi; Elizabeth M Fitzgerald; Erica Woekel; Bradley J Cardinal Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2013-08-22 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Rebeca Benito-Villena; Ingrid Guerrero-Martínez; Mariña Naveiro-Fuentes; Naomi Cano-Ibánez; Pedro Femia-Marzo; José Luis Gallo-Vallejo; Juan Mozas-Moreno; Carmen Amezcua-Prieto Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-13 Impact factor: 4.614