Bethel C A Osuagwu1, Leslie Wallace, Mathew Fraser, Aleksandra Vuckovic. 1. School of Engineering, College of Engineering and Science, James Watt Building (south)University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ UK. Stoke Mandeville Spinal Research, National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare neurological and functional outcomes between two groups of hospitalised patients with subacute tetraplegia. APPROACH: Seven patients received 20 sessions of brain computer interface (BCI) controlled functional electrical stimulation (FES) while five patients received the same number of sessions of passive FES for both hands. The neurological assessment measures were event related desynchronization (ERD) during movement attempt, Somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) of the ulnar and median nerve; assessment of hand function involved the range of motion (ROM) of wrist and manual muscle test. MAIN RESULTS: Patients in both groups initially had intense ERD during movement attempt that was not restricted to the sensory-motor cortex. Following the treatment, ERD cortical activity restored towards the activity in able-bodied people in BCI-FES group only, remaining wide-spread in FES group. Likewise, SSEP returned in 3 patients in BCI-FES group, having no changes in FES group. The ROM of the wrist improved in both groups. Muscle strength significantly improved for both hands in BCI-FES group. For FES group, a significant improvement was noticed for right hand flexor muscles only. SIGNIFICANCE: Combined BCI-FES therapy results in better neurological recovery and better improvement of muscle strength than FES alone. For spinal cord injured patients, BCI-FES should be considered as a therapeutic tool rather than solely a long-term assistive device for the restoration of a lost function.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare neurological and functional outcomes between two groups of hospitalised patients with subacute tetraplegia. APPROACH: Seven patients received 20 sessions of brain computer interface (BCI) controlled functional electrical stimulation (FES) while five patients received the same number of sessions of passive FES for both hands. The neurological assessment measures were event related desynchronization (ERD) during movement attempt, Somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) of the ulnar and median nerve; assessment of hand function involved the range of motion (ROM) of wrist and manual muscle test. MAIN RESULTS:Patients in both groups initially had intense ERD during movement attempt that was not restricted to the sensory-motor cortex. Following the treatment, ERD cortical activity restored towards the activity in able-bodied people in BCI-FES group only, remaining wide-spread in FES group. Likewise, SSEP returned in 3 patients in BCI-FES group, having no changes in FES group. The ROM of the wrist improved in both groups. Muscle strength significantly improved for both hands in BCI-FES group. For FES group, a significant improvement was noticed for right hand flexor muscles only. SIGNIFICANCE: Combined BCI-FES therapy results in better neurological recovery and better improvement of muscle strength than FES alone. For spinal cord injured patients, BCI-FES should be considered as a therapeutic tool rather than solely a long-term assistive device for the restoration of a lost function.
Authors: Jane E Huggins; Christoph Guger; Erik Aarnoutse; Brendan Allison; Charles W Anderson; Steven Bedrick; Walter Besio; Ricardo Chavarriaga; Jennifer L Collinger; An H Do; Christian Herff; Matthias Hohmann; Michelle Kinsella; Kyuhwa Lee; Fabien Lotte; Gernot Müller-Putz; Anton Nijholt; Elmar Pels; Betts Peters; Felix Putze; Rüdiger Rupp; Gerwin Schalk; Stephanie Scott; Michael Tangermann; Paul Tubig; Thorsten Zander Journal: Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon) Date: 2019-12-10
Authors: Timothy H Lucas; Xilin Liu; Milin Zhang; Sri Sritharan; Ivette Planell-Mendez; Yohannes Ghenbot; Solymar Torres-Maldonado; Cameron Brandon; Jan Van der Spiegel; Andrew G Richardson Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Anna Zulauf-Czaja; Manaf K H Al-Taleb; Mariel Purcell; Nina Petric-Gray; Jennifer Cloughley; Aleksandra Vuckovic Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 4.262
Authors: Edmund F Hodkin; Yuming Lei; Jonathan Humby; Isabel S Glover; Supriyo Choudhury; Hrishikesh Kumar; Monica A Perez; Helen Rodgers; Andrew Jackson Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Long Chen; Bin Gu; Zhongpeng Wang; Lei Zhang; Minpeng Xu; Shuang Liu; Feng He; Dong Ming Journal: Front Med Date: 2021-06-22 Impact factor: 4.592
Authors: Lazar I Jovanovic; Naaz Kapadia; Vera Zivanovic; Hope Jervis Rademeyer; Mohammad Alavinia; Colleen McGillivray; Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan; Milos R Popovic; Cesar Marquez-Chin Journal: Spinal Cord Ser Cases Date: 2021-03-19