Literature DB >> 27738893

Imaging characteristics of the postoperative globe: a pictorial essay.

Yusuke Ito1, Ikuo Yamazaki2, Yoichi Kikuchi2, Eri O'uchi2, Toshihiro O'uchi2, Hiroaki Kato3, Kazuki Hotta3.   

Abstract

Recognizing imaging characteristics after ophthalmic surgery is necessary for radiologists to prevent misdiagnosis. We review typical appearances of intraorbital implanted devices and materials on CT and MRI with demonstration of the common surgical procedures. EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration devices appear as punctate areas of metal attenuation on CT and are typically placed at the corneoscleral junction. The imaging manifestations after cataract extraction are absence of the native lens of ovoid mass and the intraocular lens with high attenuation on CT and low signal intensity on MRI. The treatment of retinal detachment is achieved with intraocular tamponade or scleral buckling. In intraocular tamponade, the eye is filled with a bubble of gas or silicone oil. Gas results in air attenuation on CT and low signal intensity on MRI in the vitreous cavity. Silicone oil is hyperattenuating on CT and has variable intensity on MRI. In scleral buckling, the eye wall is indented with silicone buckling elements that show high or low attenuation on CT and low T1- and T2-weighted intensity on MRI. Degraded hydrogel buckling elements appear as swollen masses showing low attenuation on CT and high T2-weighted intensity on MRI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glaucoma filtration device; Intraocular lens; Postoperative globe; Scleral buckle; Silicone oil

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27738893     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-016-0587-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Radiol        ISSN: 1867-1071            Impact factor:   2.374


  14 in total

Review 1.  Retinal detachment: imaging of surgical treatments and complications.

Authors:  John I Lane; Robert E Watson; Robert J Witte; Colin A McCannel
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 2.  Cataracts.

Authors:  Jay Thompson; Naheed Lakhani
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.907

3.  Long-term complications of the MAI hydrogel intrascleral buckling implant.

Authors:  J F Marin; F I Tolentino; M F Refojo; C L Schepens
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-01

4.  Hydrogel exoplant fragmentation 10 years after scleral buckling surgery.

Authors:  K I Hwang; J I Lim
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-09

5.  Artifacts and pitfalls in MR imaging of the orbit: a clinical review.

Authors:  R C Herrick; L A Hayman; K H Taber; P J Diaz-Marchan; M D Kuo
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Hydrogel implant for scleral buckling. Long-term observations.

Authors:  F I Tolentino; M Roldan; J Nassif; M F Refojo
Journal:  Retina       Date:  1985 Winter-Spring       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 7.  Postoperative imaging of the orbital contents.

Authors:  Michael J Reiter; Ryan B Schwope; Jonathan A Kini; Gerald E York; Abraham W Suhr
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 8.  Definition of glaucoma: clinical and experimental concepts.

Authors:  Robert J Casson; Glyn Chidlow; John P M Wood; Jonathan G Crowston; Ivan Goldberg
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Intraocular silicone oil: in vitro and in vivo MR and CT characteristics.

Authors:  V P Mathews; A D Elster; P B Barker; B L Buff; J A Haller; C M Greven
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  Nontraumatic orbital conditions: diagnosis with CT and MR imaging in the emergent setting.

Authors:  Christina A LeBedis; Osamu Sakai
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.