Literature DB >> 2773869

Intrusion of incisors in adult patients with marginal bone loss.

B Melsen1, N Agerbaek, G Markenstam.   

Abstract

Elongated and spaced incisors are common problems in patients suffering from severe periodontal disease. Thirty patients characterized by marginal bone loss and deep overbite were treated by intrusion of incisors. Three different methods for intrusion were applied: (1) J hooks and extraoral high-pull headgear, (2) utility arches, (3) intrusion bent into a loop in a 0.17 x 0.25-inch wire, and (4) base arch as described by Burstone. The intrusion was evaluated from the displacement of the apex, incision, and the center of resistance of the most prominent or elongated central incisor. Change in the marginal bone level and the amount of root resorption were evaluated on standardized intraoral radiographs. The pockets were assessed by standardized probing and the clinical crown length was measured on study casts. The results showed that the true intrusion of the center of resistance varied from 0 to 3.5 mm and was most pronounced when intrusion was performed with a base arch. The clinical crown length was generally reduced by 0.5 to 1.0 mm. The marginal bone level approached the cementoenamel junction in all but six cases. All cases demonstrated root resorption varying from 1 to 3 mm. The total amount of alveolar support--that is, the calculated area of the alveolar wall--was unaltered or increased in 19 of the 30 cases. The dependency of the results on the oral hygiene, the force distribution, and the perioral function was evaluated in relation to the individual cases. It was obvious that intrusion was best performed when (1) forces were low (5 to 15 gm per tooth) with the line of action of the force passing through or close to the center of resistance, (2) the gingiva status was healthy, and (3) no interference with perioral function was present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2773869     DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90460-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  37 in total

1.  Evaluation of labio-lingual bony support of lower incisors in orthodontically untreated adults with the help of computed tomography.

Authors:  K Nauert; R Berg
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  The eleventh hour or where are our orthodontic limits? Case report.

Authors:  P Diedrich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  [The correction of fanned-out incisors--an important orthodontic contribution to aesthetic dentistry].

Authors:  P Diedrich
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1992-10

4.  [Intrusion of the anterior teeth with the segmented-arch technic of Burstone--a clinical study].

Authors:  B Goerigk; P Diedrich; H Wehrbein
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1992-02

5.  [The orthodontic treatment of deep bite in adults--a comparison of the straight-wire appliance and the segmented arch technic].

Authors:  F Weiland; H P Bantleon; H Droschl
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1992-06

Review 6.  Interfaces between orthodontic and periodontal treatment: their current status.

Authors:  Christoph Reichert; Martin Hagner; Søren Jepsen; Andreas Jäger
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Three-dimensional interpretation of periodontal lesions and remodeling during orthodontic treatment. Part III.

Authors:  R Fuhrmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Intrusion mechanics according to Burstone with the NiTi-SE-steel uprighting spring.

Authors:  F G Sander; A Wichelhaus; C Schiemann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Combined intrusion and retraction generated by cantilevers with helical coils.

Authors:  B Melsen; V Konstantellos; M Lagoudakis; J Planert
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.938

10.  Rate of intrusion of maxillary incisors in Class II Div 1 malocclusion using skeletal anchorage device and Connecticut intrusion arch.

Authors:  Prasanna Kumar; Sanjeev Datana; S M Londhe; Abhijeet Kadu
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.