| Literature DB >> 27738408 |
Yuuki Matsumoto1, Naohisa Uchimura2, Tetsuya Ishida2, Kouji Toyomasu3, Yoshitaka Morimatsu1, Mihoko Mori1, Nanae Kushino1, Michiko Hoshiko1, Tatsuya Ishitake1.
Abstract
Both a higher suicide rate and widespread sleep problems are serious health concerns in Japan when compared with those of other countries. We investigated the relationship between suicidal ideation and sleep problems in Japanese day workers using the 3-dimensional sleep scale (3DSS), which measures three sleep elements (phase, quality, and quantity). Data from 635 Japanese day workers (461 mens and 174 womens) were included. The 3DSS was used to assess participants' sleep condition. Participants were classified into eight sleep types based on scores of phase, quality, and quantity: All Good Sleep, Owl (poor phase), Inefficient (poor quality), Short (poor quantity), Owl + Inefficient (poor phase and quality), Owl + Short (poor phase and quantity), Inefficient + Short (poor quality and quantity), and All Poor Sleep. We assessed participants' suicidal ideation using question 19 of the self-rating depression scale (SDS); 119 cases (18.7 %) had ratings of 2-4 for this question and were considered to have suicidal ideation. The higher the number of sleep problems, the higher the risk of suicidal ideation compared to sleep types not indicative of problems. All Poor Sleep had the highest risk of the eight sleep types. Individuals with Owl + Short, Inefficient + Short, or All Poor Sleep had a significant risk of suicidal ideation even after adjusting for hopelessness and nightmares. Our findings suggested that sleep problems assessed by the 3DSS were related to suicidal ideation. Analysis of various aspects of sleep could be helpful for suicide prevention.Entities:
Keywords: Depression; Sleep; Sleep deprivation; Suicidal ideation; Suicide
Year: 2016 PMID: 27738408 PMCID: PMC5037152 DOI: 10.1007/s41105-016-0067-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sleep Biol Rhythms ISSN: 1446-9235 Impact factor: 1.186
Number of participants belonging to the eight sleep types based on the cut-off points of the 3-dimensional sleep scale (3DSS)
| Sleep type |
| Relation to 3DSS cut-off points | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase (8/9) | Quality (10/11) | Quantity (8/9) | ||
| All Good Sleep | 122 (19.2) | H | H | H |
| Owl | 70 (11.0) | L | H | H |
| Inefficient | 61 (9.6) | H | L | H |
| Short | 61 (9.6) | H | H | L |
| Owl + Inefficient | 37 (5.8) | L | L | H |
| Owl + Short | 85 (13.4) | L | H | L |
| Inefficient + Short | 109 (17.2) | H | L | L |
| All Poor Sleep | 90 (14.2) | L | L | L |
H higher than cut-off point, L lower than cut-off point
Fig. 1Displaying 3-dimensional sleep conditions of the eight sleep types and 3DSS scores (mean ± standard deviation)
Characteristics classified by 3-dimensional sleep scale (3DSS) scores
| Total | All Good Sleep | Owl | Inefficient | Short | Owl + Inefficient | Owl + Short | Inefficient + Short | All Poor Sleep | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||
| Under 39 | 274 (43.1) | 48 (39.3) | 44 (62.9)a | 19 (31.1)b | 27 (44.3) | 15 (40.5) | 46 (54.1)a | 28 (25.7)b | 47 (52.2) | |
| Over 40 | 361 (56.9) | 74 (60.7) | 26 (37.1)b | 42 (68.9)a | 34 (55.7) | 22 (59.5) | 39 (45.9)b | 81 (74.3)a | 43 (47.8) | |
|
| ||||||||||
| Male | 461 (72.6) | 97 (79.5) | 50 (71.4) | 40 (65.6) | 37 (60.7)b | 30 (81.1) | 56 (65.9) | 83 (76.1) | 68 (75.6) | |
| Female | 174 (27.4) | 25 (20.5) | 20 (28.6) | 21 (34.4) | 24 (39.3)a | 7 (18.9) | 29 (34.1) | 26 (23.9) | 22 (24.4) | |
|
| ||||||||||
| Single | 202 (31.8) | 19 (15.6)b | 24 (34.3) | 16 (26.2) | 11 (18.0)b | 13 (35.1) | 41 (48.2)a | 27 (24.8) | 51 (56.7)a | |
| Married | 406 (63.9) | 97 (79.5)a | 45 (64.3) | 43 (70.5) | 44 (72.1) | 24 (64.9) | 41 (48.2)b | 75 (68.8) | 37 (41.1)b | |
| Other | 27 (4.3) | 6 (4.9) | 1 (1.4) | 2 (3.3) | 6 (9.8)a | 0 (0.0) | 3 (3.5) | 7 (6.4) | 2 (2.2) | |
|
| ||||||||||
| Manufacturing | 407 (64.1) | 86 (70.5) | 48 (68.6) | 41 (67.3) | 38 (62.3) | 21 (56.7) | 48 (56.4) | 79 (72.5) | 46 (51.1) | |
| Service | 228 (35.9) | 36 (29.5) | 22 (31.4) | 20 (32.8) | 23 (37.7) | 16 (43.2) | 37 (43.5) | 30 (27.5) | 44 (48.9) | |
|
| ||||||||||
| No | 516 (81.3) | 116 (95.1)a | 59 (84.3) | 51 (83.6) | 53 (86.9) | 31 (83.8) | 65 (76.5) | 83 (76.1) | 58 (64.4)b | |
| Yes | 119 (18.7) | 6 (4.9)b | 11 (15.7) | 10 (16.4) | 8 (13.1) | 6 (16.2) | 20 (23.5) | 26 (23.9) | 32 (35.6)a | |
|
| ||||||||||
| No | 465 (73.2) | 106 (86.9)a | 54 (77.1) | 41 (67.2) | 53 (86.9)a | 25 (67.6) | 58 (68.2) | 74 (67.9) | 54 (60.0)b | |
| Yes | 170 (26.8) | 16 (13.1)b | 16 (22.9) | 20 (32.8) | 8 (13.1)b | 12 (32.4) | 27 (31.8) | 35 (32.1) | 36 (40.0)a | |
|
| ||||||||||
| No | 555 (87.4) | 118 (96.7)a | 64 (91.4) | 52 (85.2) | 57 (93.4) | 35 (94.6) | 73 (85.9) | 85 (78.0)b | 71 (78.9)b | |
| Yes | 80 (12.6) | 4 (3.3)b | 6 (8.6) | 9 (14.8) | 4 (6.6) | 2 (5.4) | 12 (14.1) | 24 (22.0)a | 19 (21.1)a | |
|
| 39.7 ± 7.3 | 34.9 ± 6.2* | 37.5 ± 7.2 | 39.9 ± 7.2 | 38.0 ± 6.1 | 39.4 ± 5.9 | 40.7 ± 6.9 | 42.6 ± 6.9 | 44.4 ± 6.5 | |
The overall SDS score (Mean ± SD) including a sleep item was 41.2 ± 7.6
SDS self-rating depression scale
aSignificantly high rate by χ 2 test
bSignificantly low rate by χ 2 test
* Significant differences between All Good Sleep and other sleep types, except Owl type, by Dunnett’s t-test
Fig. 2Estimated value of 3DSS scores and multiple comparisons by ANCOVA (adjusted for age, gender, marital status, and company). Participants were classified into three groups based on SDS scores (under 39 = normal, 40–49 = slight depression, over 50 = moderate depression). There were significant differences (**p < 0.01; † p < 0.001, Bonferroni correction) for all comparisons of 3DSS scores
Odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals of suicidal ideation by sleep type
| Sleep type | Model 1a | Model 2b | Model 3c | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95 % CI) |
| OR (95 % CI) |
| OR (95 % CI) |
| |
| All Good Sleep | Reference | Reference | Reference | |||
| Owl | 3.61 (1.27–10.2) | 0.011* | 3.14 (1.07–9.16) | 0.037* | 2.56 (0.86–7.65) | 0.093 |
| Inefficient | 3.79 (1.31–11.0) | 0.010* | 3.80 (1.29–11.2) | 0.016* | 2.64 (0.86–8.05) | 0.089 |
| Short | 2.92 (0.96–8.83) | 0.049* | 3.15 (1.02–9.73) | 0.046* | 3.01 (0.96–9.47) | 0.059 |
| Owl + Inefficient | 3.74 (1.13–12.4) | 0.023* | 3.53 (1.04–12.0) | 0.044* | 2.67 (0.77–9.29) | 0.122 |
| Owl + Short | 5.95 (2.27–15.6) | <0.001* | 4.94 (1.84–13.3) | 0.002* | 3.76 (1.37–10.3) | 0.010* |
| Inefficient + Short | 6.06 (2.39–15.4) | <0.001* | 6.12 (2.36–15.8) | <0.001* | 4.49 (1.70–11.9) | 0.002* |
| All Poor Sleep | 10.7 (4.22–27.0) | <0.001* | 8.83 (3.39–23.0) | <0.001* | 6.02 (2.26–16.0) | <0.001* |
aUnadjusted (crude) OR
bAdjusted for age, gender, marital status, and company (omnibus test, p < 0.05; Hosmer–Lemeshow test, p > 0.1)
cAdjusted for age, gender, marital status, company, hopelessness, and nightmares (omnibus test, p < 0.05; Hosmer–Lemeshow test, p > 0.1)
* Significant difference