| Literature DB >> 27738311 |
Hesti Lina Wiraswati1,2,3,4,5, Emilie Hangen1,2,3,4, Ana Belén Sanz1,2,3,4,6, Ngoc-Vy Lam1,2,3,4, Camille Reinhardt3,4,7, Allan Sauvat1,2,3,8, Ariane Mogha1,2,3,4, Alberto Ortiz6, Guido Kroemer1,2,3,8,9,10,11,12, Nazanine Modjtahedi3,4,7.
Abstract
Mitochondrial apoptosis inducing factor (AIF) is a redox-active enzyme that participates to the biogenesis/maintenance of complex I of the respiratory chain, yet also contributes to catabolic reactions in the context of regulated cell death when AIF translocates to the cytosol and to the nucleus. Here we explore the contribution of AIF to cell death induced by menadione (2-methyl-1,4-naphtoquinone; also called vitamin K3) in conditions in which this pro-oxidant does not cause the mitochondrial release of AIF, yet causes caspase-independent cell killing. Depletion of AIF from human cancer cells reduced the cytotoxicity of menadione. This cytoprotective effect was accompanied by the maintenance of high levels of reduced glutathione (GSH), which are normally depleted by menadione. In addition, AIF depletion reduced the arylation of cellular proteins induced by menadione. This menadione-triggered arylation, which can be measured by a fluorescence assay, is completely suppressed by addition of exogenous glutathione or N-acetyl cysteine. Complex I inhibition by Rotenone did not mimic the cytoprotective action of AIF depletion. Altogether, these results are compatible with the hypothesis that mitochondrion-sessile AIF facilitates lethal redox cycling of menadione, thereby precipitating protein arylation and glutathione depletion.Entities:
Keywords: Autophagy; mitochondria; oxidative stress; protein arylation; quinone metabolization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27738311 PMCID: PMC5363526 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12562
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Impact of AIF expression on the cytotoxicity of menadione
A. After 3h treatment with (+) or without (−) 50μM menadione, the subcellular localization of AIF in U2OS cells was checked by immunoblot in the indicated fractions, using antibodies directed against proteins localized in mitochondria (HSP60, VDAC and cytochrome c), cytosol (caspase-3) or nuclei (PARP). B. Extracts of U2OS cells (duplicates) subjected to the transfection with AIF-specific (AIF.1 and AIF.2) or control (Co.1 and Co.2) siRNA were analyzed by immunoblot for the abundance of AIF. Actin was used as a loading control. C. D. U2OS cells transfected with two distinct control siRNAs (Co.1 and Co.2) or two distinct, non-overlapping siRNAs targeting AIF (siRNA AIF.1 and AIF.2) were treated with 50μM menadione or the solvent (Control) for 3h and drug-induced cell death was quantified by flow cytometric assessment (pictograms shown in C; histograms shown in D) of DAPI uptake (DAPI positivity) and forward light scatter (FSC) analysis that allows for the identification of apoptotic cells according to their reduced size (low FSC). Data are expressed as mean values ± SEM.
Figure 2Impact of AIF expression on the cytotoxicity of members of Quinone-derived drug family
A.-C. U2OS cells transfected with two distinct control siRNAs (Co.1 and Co.2) or two distinct, non-overlapping siRNAs targeting AIF (siRNA AIF.1 and AIF.2) were treated with 120μM benzoquinone (BZQ) for 3h (A); 20 μM 2,3-dimethoxy-1,4-naphtoquinone (DMNQ) for 48h (B) or 6 μM mitoxantrone (MTX) for 19h (C) or the solvent (Control). Drug-induced cell death was quantified by flow cytometric assessment (histograms) of DAPI uptake (DAPI positivity) and forward light scatter (FSC) analysis that allows the identification of apoptotic cells according to their reduced size (low FSC). Data are expressed as mean values ± SEM.
Figure 3Effect of respiratory chain complex I inhibition on Menadione-induced cytotoxicity
A. Dose-dependent rotenone-induced respiratory chain complex I inhibition was monitored by flow cytometry, after excitation with a UV laser. The augmentation of cell fluorescence reflects the accumulation of NADH in the treated cells. The NADH-dependent autofluorescence of cells incubated with 1 to 5 μM of rotenone for 4.5 h was compared to that of untreated cells (0 μM) and negative control cells (Ctrl) permeabilized with 70% ETOH before analysis. B. The mitochondrial membrane potential of cells incubated with 1 μM rotenone for 1.5 h or 4.5 h was monitored by flow cytometry, using the MitoProbe Dil C1(5), and compared to that of control cells untreated (Ctrl) or treated with the protonophore CCCP, which dissipates the mitochondrial transmembrane potential. For each condition, the percentage of cells showing a reduced Dil C1(5) incorporation is mentioned. C. The effect of rotenone on cell survival was quantified by flow cytometric assessment of DAPI uptake (DAPI positivity) and forward light scatter (FSC) analysis, after incubation with 0 to 2μM of Rotenone for the indicated times. D. Effects of AIF knockdown, combined or not with rotenone treatment (1 μM for 4.5 h), on menadione-induced (50 μM for 3 h) cytotoxicity was analyzed after transfection with two distinct control siRNAs (Co.1 and Co.2) or two distinct, non-overlapping siRNAs targeting AIF (siRNA AIF.1 and AIF.2). Cell death was monitored by flow cytometric assessment of DAPI uptake (DAPI positivity) and forward light scatter (FSC) analysis. Data are expressed as mean values ± SD.
Figure 4The loss of GSH levels in menadione-treated cells correlates with the expression level of AIF
A., B. Effect of exogenous antioxidants on menadione-induced death was evaluated by incubating U2OS cells, for 3h or 6h, with 50μM of menadione in the absence or presence of GSH (5 mM) or NAC (5 mM). Cell death was quantified by flow cytometric assessment (pictograms are shown in A and histograms in B) of DAPI uptake (DAPI positivity) and forward light scatter (FSC) analysis that allows the identification of apoptotic cells. C., D. A cytofluorimetric analysis combined with the use of the thiol-reactive probe monobromobimane (MBB) was set up to measure levels of reduced glutathione in cells treated with menadione (pictograms are shown in C and histograms D). After menadione treatment, in absence or presence of exogenous antioxidants (GSH or NAC), live cells (Topro3 negative), exhibiting size and granularity parameters similar to control untreated cells (gate P1), were analyzed for their staining with MBB (gate P2). Cell width assessment by forward light scatter (FSC) analysis was used to discriminate between singlet cells and aggregates. For each treatment condition, the percentage of cells stained with MBB (gate P2) was quantified (D). E. The effect of AIF knockdown on the levels of GSH was monitored, as described in (C and D), after transfection with two distinct control siRNAs (Co.1 and Co.2) or two distinct, non-overlapping siRNAs targeting AIF (siRNA AIF.1 and AIF.2) and culture with 50 μM of menadione for 3h. Data are expressed as mean values ± SD.
Figure 5The metabolization of fluorescent menadione-cysteinyl group conjugates correlates with AIF expression levels
A. Microscopic analysis of U2OS cells revealed that, compared to control conditions (cells treated with the solvent), the incubation with 50 μM menadione for 3 h provoked the appearance of a diffuse cellular fluorescence that resisted to the fixation/permeabilization protocol. The mitochondrial localization of AIF, both in control and menadione-treated cells, was revealed by indirect immunofluorescence, using an anti-AIF rabbit polyclonal antibody and an Alexafluor 647-conjugated secondary anti-rabbit antibody (AIF red staining). Individual and merged images show that in menadione-treated cells, AIF is not released from the mitochondrion and the diffuse distribution of menadione-induced autofluorescence is maximal in the nuclear compartment. B. Emission spectra and intensity analyses of the fluorescence produced in menadione-treated cells were evaluated by microscopy. The insert corresponds to the menadione-treated cell that was imaged by fluorescence microscopy (Zeiss) and squares on the image correspond to distinct regions of interest (ROI1 to to ROI3) that were evaluated for fluorescence spectra. C. D. The formation of fluorescent menadione-cysteinyl group conjugates (green fluorescence, GF) was monitored by flow cytometric analysis of U2OS cells incubated for 3h or 6h with 50 μM menadione, in the absence or presence of exogenous antioxidants GSH (5 mM) or NAC (5 mM). Analyses of the pictograms (C) and histograms (D) reveal that treatments with both exogenous GSH and NAC inhibit the formation of the fluorescent menadione-cysteinyl group conjugates in menadione-treated cells. E. F. After transfection with two distinct control siRNAs (Co.1 and Co.2) or two distinct, non-overlapping siRNAs targeting AIF (siRNA AIF.1 and AIF.2), cells were submitted to menadione treatment (50μM) for 3 h and then analyzed, as in C and D, for the formation of fluorescent menadione-cysteinyl group conjugates. Analyses of the pictograms (E) and histograms (F) reveal that the depletion of AIF inhibits the formation of the fluorescent menadione-cysteinyl group conjugates in menadione-treated cells. DAPI staining was used for monitoring of death-induced membrane permeabilization. Data are expressed as mean values ± SD.
Figure 6Impact of recombinant AIF on the arylating capacity of menadione
To assess the arylating activity of menadione and evaluate the capacity of AIF to stimulate the formation of thioester bonds between menadione and GSH, menadione (250 μM) was directly added to an aqueous solution of GSH (100mM) in the absence or presence of recombinant purified AIF (40 μg/ml). Emission spectra were analyzed after excitation at 340 nm. The combination of menadione with GSH (purple line) produced fluorescence. The addition of recombinant AIF stimulated the arylating capacity of menadione that could be measured by the enhancement of the fluorescence (orange line). No fluorescence was detected for menadione, GSH alone or the combination of menadione with AIF alone.