Yilun Zhou1, Yuesong Pan1, Yu Wu1, Xingquan Zhao1, Hao Li1, David Wang1, S Claiborne Johnston1, Liping Liu1, Chunxue Wang1, Xia Meng1, Yilong Wang2, Yongjun Wang2. 1. From the Department of Nephrology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital (Y.Z., Y.W.), Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital (Y.P., X.Z., H.L., L.L., C.W., X.M., Yilong Wang, Yongjun Wang), and Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health (Y.P.), Capital Medical University, China; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China (Y.P., X.Z., H.L., L.L., C.W., X.M., Yilong Wang, Yongjun Wang); Center of Stroke, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, China (Y.P., X.Z., H.L., L.L., C.W., X.M., Yilong Wang, Yongjun Wang); Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine for Cerebrovascular Disease, China (Y.P., X.Z., H.L., L.L., C.W., X.M., Yilong Wang, Yongjun Wang); INI Stroke Network, OSF Healthcare System, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria (D.W.); and Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin (S.C.J.). 2. From the Department of Nephrology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital (Y.Z., Y.W.), Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital (Y.P., X.Z., H.L., L.L., C.W., X.M., Yilong Wang, Yongjun Wang), and Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health (Y.P.), Capital Medical University, China; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China (Y.P., X.Z., H.L., L.L., C.W., X.M., Yilong Wang, Yongjun Wang); Center of Stroke, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, China (Y.P., X.Z., H.L., L.L., C.W., X.M., Yilong Wang, Yongjun Wang); Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine for Cerebrovascular Disease, China (Y.P., X.Z., H.L., L.L., C.W., X.M., Yilong Wang, Yongjun Wang); INI Stroke Network, OSF Healthcare System, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria (D.W.); and Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin (S.C.J.). yilong528@gmail.com yongjunwang1962@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at a particularly high risk for ischemic and bleeding events. Limited data exist as to the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel in stroke patients with renal dysfunction. Therefore, we sought to assess the impact of decreased kidney function on clinical outcomes for stroke patients on clopidogrel-aspirin treatment. METHODS:Patients in the CHANCE trial (Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients With Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events) were randomized to clopidogrel-aspirin or aspirin-alone treatment. The primary efficacy outcome was new stroke during 90 days, whereas bleeding was the safety outcome. Patients were stratified according to estimated glomerular filtration rate. RESULTS:Dual clopidogrel-aspirin therapy was associated with a marked reduction in new strokes compared with the therapy of aspirin alone in patients with normal renal function (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.98; P=0.02) and mild CKD (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.79; P<0.01), whereas in patients with moderate CKD, no significant benefit from clopidogrel therapy was detected (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-2.35; P=0.99). There was no clear difference in bleeding episodes by treatment assignment across categories of renal impairment. CONCLUSIONS:Clopidogrel plus aspirin could decrease new stroke in patients with normal kidney function and mild CKD, but no extra benefit was observed in those with moderate CKD. Bleeding risk from the dual therapy did not seem to increase in mild or moderate CKD patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00979589.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at a particularly high risk for ischemic and bleeding events. Limited data exist as to the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel in strokepatients with renal dysfunction. Therefore, we sought to assess the impact of decreased kidney function on clinical outcomes for strokepatients on clopidogrel-aspirin treatment. METHODS:Patients in the CHANCE trial (Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients With Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events) were randomized to clopidogrel-aspirin or aspirin-alone treatment. The primary efficacy outcome was new stroke during 90 days, whereas bleeding was the safety outcome. Patients were stratified according to estimated glomerular filtration rate. RESULTS: Dual clopidogrel-aspirin therapy was associated with a marked reduction in new strokes compared with the therapy of aspirin alone in patients with normal renal function (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.98; P=0.02) and mild CKD (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.79; P<0.01), whereas in patients with moderate CKD, no significant benefit from clopidogrel therapy was detected (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-2.35; P=0.99). There was no clear difference in bleeding episodes by treatment assignment across categories of renal impairment. CONCLUSIONS:Clopidogrel plus aspirin could decrease new stroke in patients with normal kidney function and mild CKD, but no extra benefit was observed in those with moderate CKD. Bleeding risk from the dual therapy did not seem to increase in mild or moderate CKD patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00979589.
Authors: Patrizia Natale; Suetonia C Palmer; Valeria M Saglimbene; Marinella Ruospo; Mona Razavian; Jonathan C Craig; Meg J Jardine; Angela C Webster; Giovanni Fm Strippoli Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2022-02-28