Literature DB >> 27738143

Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests.

Jingjing Liang1, Thomas W Crowther2, Nicolas Picard3, Susan Wiser4, Mo Zhou5, Giorgio Alberti6, Ernst-Detlef Schulze7, A David McGuire8, Fabio Bozzato9, Hans Pretzsch10, Sergio de-Miguel11, Alain Paquette12, Bruno Hérault13, Michael Scherer-Lorenzen14, Christopher B Barrett15, Henry B Glick16, Geerten M Hengeveld17, Gert-Jan Nabuurs18, Sebastian Pfautsch19, Helder Viana20, Alexander C Vibrans21, Christian Ammer22, Peter Schall22, David Verbyla23, Nadja Tchebakova24, Markus Fischer25, James V Watson5, Han Y H Chen26, Xiangdong Lei27, Mart-Jan Schelhaas28, Huicui Lu29, Damiano Gianelle30, Elena I Parfenova24, Christian Salas31, Eungul Lee32, Boknam Lee33, Hyun Seok Kim34, Helge Bruelheide35, David A Coomes36, Daniel Piotto37, Terry Sunderland38, Bernhard Schmid39, Sylvie Gourlet-Fleury40, Bonaventure Sonké41, Rebecca Tavani42, Jun Zhu43, Susanne Brandl44, Jordi Vayreda45, Fumiaki Kitahara46, Eric B Searle26, Victor J Neldner47, Michael R Ngugi47, Christopher Baraloto48, Lorenzo Frizzera49, Radomir Bałazy50, Jacek Oleksyn51, Tomasz Zawiła-Niedźwiecki52, Olivier Bouriaud53, Filippo Bussotti54, Leena Finér55, Bogdan Jaroszewicz56, Tommaso Jucker36, Fernando Valladares57, Andrzej M Jagodzinski58, Pablo L Peri59, Christelle Gonmadje60, William Marthy61, Timothy O'Brien61, Emanuel H Martin62, Andrew R Marshall63, Francesco Rovero64, Robert Bitariho65, Pascal A Niklaus39, Patricia Alvarez-Loayza66, Nurdin Chamuya67, Renato Valencia68, Frédéric Mortier40, Verginia Wortel69, Nestor L Engone-Obiang70, Leandro V Ferreira71, David E Odeke72, Rodolfo M Vasquez73, Simon L Lewis74, Peter B Reich75.   

Abstract

The biodiversity-productivity relationship (BPR) is foundational to our understanding of the global extinction crisis and its impacts on ecosystem functioning. Understanding BPR is critical for the accurate valuation and effective conservation of biodiversity. Using ground-sourced data from 777,126 permanent plots, spanning 44 countries and most terrestrial biomes, we reveal a globally consistent positive concave-down BPR, showing that continued biodiversity loss would result in an accelerating decline in forest productivity worldwide. The value of biodiversity in maintaining commercial forest productivity alone-US$166 billion to 490 billion per year according to our estimation-is more than twice what it would cost to implement effective global conservation. This highlights the need for a worldwide reassessment of biodiversity values, forest management strategies, and conservation priorities.
Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27738143     DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf8957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  82 in total

Review 1.  Biodiversity in the Anthropocene: prospects and policy.

Authors:  Nathalie Seddon; Georgina M Mace; Shahid Naeem; Joseph A Tobias; Alex L Pigot; Rachel Cavanagh; David Mouillot; James Vause; Matt Walpole
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Effects of canopy structure and species diversity on primary production in upper Great Lakes forests.

Authors:  Cynthia M Scheuermann; Lucas E Nave; Robert T Fahey; Knute J Nadelhoffer; Christopher M Gough
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Tree species richness increases ecosystem carbon storage in subtropical forests.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Liu; Stefan Trogisch; Jin-Sheng He; Pascal A Niklaus; Helge Bruelheide; Zhiyao Tang; Alexandra Erfmeier; Michael Scherer-Lorenzen; Katherina A Pietsch; Bo Yang; Peter Kühn; Thomas Scholten; Yuanyuan Huang; Chao Wang; Michael Staab; Katrin N Leppert; Christian Wirth; Bernhard Schmid; Keping Ma
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Competitive network determines the direction of the diversity-function relationship.

Authors:  Daniel S Maynard; Thomas W Crowther; Mark A Bradford
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Biodiversity effects in the wild are common and as strong as key drivers of productivity.

Authors:  J Emmett Duffy; Casey M Godwin; Bradley J Cardinale
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Diversity-biomass relationship across forest layers: implications for niche complementarity and selection effects.

Authors:  Sylvanus Mensah; Ben du Toit; Thomas Seifert
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Positive biodiversity-productivity relationships in forests: climate matters.

Authors:  H Jactel; E S Gritti; L Drössler; D I Forrester; W L Mason; X Morin; H Pretzsch; B Castagneyrol
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Aboveground overyielding in a mixed temperate forest is not explained by belowground processes.

Authors:  Alexandre Fruleux; Marie-Béatrice Bogeat-Triboulot; Catherine Collet; Aurélie Deveau; Laurent Saint-André; Philippe Santenoise; Damien Bonal
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Sea urchins mediate the availability of kelp detritus to benthic consumers.

Authors:  Christie E Yorke; Henry M Page; Robert J Miller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Determining the scale at which variation in a single gene changes population yields.

Authors:  Erica McGale; Henrique Valim; Deepika Mittal; Jesús Morales Jimenez; Rayko Halitschke; Meredith C Schuman; Ian T Baldwin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.