Literature DB >> 27738011

Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer with Textural Features Derived from Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging.

Roelof J Beukinga1,2,3, Jan B Hulshoff1, Lisanne V van Dijk4, Christina T Muijs4, Johannes G M Burgerhof5, Gursah Kats-Ugurlu6, Riemer H J A Slart2,3, Cornelis H Slump7, Véronique E M Mul4, John Th M Plukker8.   

Abstract

Adequate prediction of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in esophageal cancer (EC) patients is important in a more personalized treatment. The current best clinical method to predict pathologic complete response is SUVmax in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging. To improve the prediction of response, we constructed a model to predict complete response to nCRT in EC based on pretreatment clinical parameters and 18F-FDG PET/CT-derived textural features.
Methods: From a prospectively maintained single-institution database, we reviewed 97 consecutive patients with locally advanced EC and a pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT scan between 2009 and 2015. All patients were treated with nCRT (carboplatin/paclitaxel/41.4 Gy) followed by esophagectomy. We analyzed clinical, geometric, and pretreatment textural features extracted from both 18F-FDG PET and CT. The current most accurate prediction model with SUVmax as a predictor variable was compared with 6 different response prediction models constructed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regularized logistic regression. Internal validation was performed to estimate the model's performances. Pathologic response was defined as complete versus incomplete response (Mandard tumor regression grade system 1 vs. 2-5).
Results: Pathologic examination revealed 19 (19.6%) complete and 78 (80.4%) incomplete responders. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regularization selected the clinical parameters: histologic type and clinical T stage, the 18F-FDG PET-derived textural feature long run low gray level emphasis, and the CT-derived textural feature run percentage. Introducing these variables to a logistic regression analysis showed areas under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUCs) of 0.78 compared with 0.58 in the SUVmax model. The discrimination slopes were 0.17 compared with 0.01, respectively. After internal validation, the AUCs decreased to 0.74 and 0.54, respectively.
Conclusion: The predictive values of the constructed models were superior to the standard method (SUVmax). These results can be considered as an initial step in predicting tumor response to nCRT in locally advanced EC. Further research in refining the predictive value of these models is needed to justify omission of surgery.
© 2017 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-FDG PET/CT; esophageal cancer; response prediction; textural analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27738011     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.180299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  21 in total

1.  Increased FDG uptake on late-treatment PET in non-tumour-affected oesophagus is prognostic for pathological complete response and disease recurrence in patients undergoing neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy.

Authors:  Sebastian Zschaeck; Frank Hofheinz; Klaus Zöphel; Rebecca Bütof; Christina Jentsch; Julia Schmollack; Steffen Löck; Jörg Kotzerke; Gustavo Baretton; Jürgen Weitz; Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Radiomics in Oncological PET Imaging: A Systematic Review-Part 2, Infradiaphragmatic Cancers, Blood Malignancies, Melanoma and Musculoskeletal Cancers.

Authors:  David Morland; Elizabeth Katherine Anna Triumbari; Luca Boldrini; Roberto Gatta; Daniele Pizzuto; Salvatore Annunziata
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27

Review 3.  Advanced analytics and artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review of radiomics predicting response to treatment.

Authors:  Nina J Wesdorp; Tessa Hellingman; Elise P Jansma; Jan-Hein T M van Waesberghe; Ronald Boellaard; Cornelis J A Punt; Joost Huiskens; Geert Kazemier
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  A Meta-Analysis for Using Radiomics to Predict Complete Pathological Response in Esophageal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation.

Authors:  Yung-Shuo Kao; Yen Hsu
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.406

5.  Editorial on "Can CT-PET and endoscopic assessment post-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy predict residual disease in esophageal cancer".

Authors:  Chia-Ju Liu; Wei Lu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.005

6.  Prognostic factors in breast cancer patients evaluated by positron-emission tomography/computed tomography before neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Mark K Farrugia; Sinjen Wen; Geraldine M Jacobson; Mohamad Adham Salkeni
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

7.  Exploratory radiomic features from integrated 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging are associated with contemporaneous metastases in oesophageal/gastroesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Serena Baiocco; Bert-Ram Sah; Andrew Mallia; Christian Kelly-Morland; Radhouene Neji; J James Stirling; Sami Jeljeli; Alessandro Bevilacqua; Gary J R Cook; Vicky Goh
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Staging and Response Evaluation to Neo-Adjuvant Chemoradiation in Esophageal Cancers Using 18FDG PET/ CT with Standardized Protocol.

Authors:  Nosheen Fatima; Maseeh Uz Zaman; Areeba Zaman; Unaiza Zaman; Rabia Tahseen; Sidra Zaman
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2019-07-01

Review 9.  Machine Learning and Radiomics Applications in Esophageal Cancers Using Non-Invasive Imaging Methods-A Critical Review of Literature.

Authors:  Chen-Yi Xie; Chun-Lap Pang; Benjamin Chan; Emily Yuen-Yuen Wong; Qi Dou; Varut Vardhanabhuti
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 10.  Challenges and Promises of PET Radiomics.

Authors:  Gary J R Cook; Gurdip Azad; Kasia Owczarczyk; Musib Siddique; Vicky Goh
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.