Literature DB >> 27737963

Long-term single-institute experience with trimodal bladder-preserving therapy with proton beam therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Ei-Ichiro Takaoka1, Jun Miyazaki1, Hitoshi Ishikawa2, Koji Kawai1, Tomokazu Kimura1, Ryutaro Ishitsuka1, Takahiro Kojima1, Reiko Kanuma2, Daichi Takizawa2, Toshiyuki Okumura2, Hideyuki Sakurai2, Hiroyuki Nishiyama3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively elucidated the oncological outcomes, prognostic factors and toxicities of proton beam therapy in trimodal bladder-preserving therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer at our institution.
METHODS: From 1990 to 2015, 70 patients with cT2-3N0M0 muscle-invasive bladder cancer underwent trimodal bladder-preserving therapy consisting of maximal transurethral resection of the bladder tumor, small pelvis photon irradiation, intra-arterial chemotherapy and proton beam therapy. The overall survival rate, progression-free survival rate, time to progression, predictive factors for progression and toxicities were analyzed. Progression was defined as when muscle-invasive recurrence, distant metastasis or upper urinary tract recurrence was observed.
RESULTS: The patients' median age was 65 (range 36-85) years. The median follow-up period was 3.4 (range 0.6-19.5) years. The 5-year cumulative overall survival rate, progression-free survival rate and time to progression rate were 82%, 77%, and 82%, respectively. In univariate and multivariate analyses, tumor multiplicity and tumor size (≥5 cm) were significant and independent factors associated with progression (hazard ratio 3.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1-12; hazard ratio 5.0, 95% confidence interval 1.3-17; P < 0.05 for all). As for toxicity, 26 (18%) patients had grade 3-4 acute hematologic toxicities and 2 (3%) patients had grade 3 late genitourinary toxicity. No patient had to discontinue the treatment due to acute toxicity.
CONCLUSIONS: Our bladder-preserving therapy with proton beam therapy was well tolerated and achieved a favorable mortality rate. Tumor multiplicity and tumor size were important risk factors for progression. Our findings indicate that this therapy can be an effective treatment option for selected muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  muscle-invasive bladder cancer; proton beam therapy; toxicity; trimodal bladder-preserving therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27737963     DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyw151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0368-2811            Impact factor:   3.019


  3 in total

1.  A single-institute experience of trimodal bladder-preserving therapy for histologic variants of urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Nagumo; Takahiro Kojima; Masanobu Shiga; Shuya Kandori; Tomokazu Kimura; Ei-Ichiro Takaoka; Mizuki Onozawa; Jun Miyazaki; Koji Kawai; Hitoshi Ishikawa; Hideyuki Sakurai; Hiroyuki Nishiyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Biodistribution of gold nanoparticles in BBN-induced muscle-invasive bladder cancer in mice.

Authors:  Henry M Smilowitz; Lauren J Tarmu; Mary Melinda Sanders; John A Taylor; Dharamainder Choudhary; Crystal Xue; Nathaniel A Dyment; Dan Sasso; Xiaomeng Deng; James F Hainfeld
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-10-27

3.  The updated outcomes of bladder-preserving trimodal therapy using a real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy system for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Haruka Miyata; Takahiro Osawa; Takashige Abe; Hiroshi Kikuchi; Ryuji Matsumoto; Satoru Maruyama; Kentaro Nishioka; Shinichi Shimizu; Takayuki Hashimoto; Hiroki Shirato; Nobuo Shinohara
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.019

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.