BACKGROUND: Understanding the period of time between an exposure resulting in infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and when a test can reliably detect the presence of that infection, that is, the test window period, may benefit testing programs and clinicians in counseling patients about when the clinician and the patient can be confident a suspected exposure did not result in HIV infection. METHODS: We evaluated the intervals between reactivity of the Aptima HIV-1 RNA test (Aptima) and 20 US Food and Drug Administration-approved HIV immunoassays using 222 longitudinally collected plasma specimens from HIV-1 seroconverters from the United States. Using interval-censored survival and binomial regression approaches a multi-model framework was implemented to estimate the relative emergence of test reactivity, referred to here as an inter-test reactivity interval (ITRI). We then combined ITRI results with simulated data for the eclipse period, the time between exposure and detection of HIV virus by Aptima, to estimate the window period for each test. RESULTS: The estimated ITRIs were shorter with each new class of HIV tests, ranging from 5.9 to 24.8 days. The 99th percentiles of the window period probability distribution ranged from 44 days for laboratory screening tests that detect both antigen and antibody to 65 days for the Western blot test. CONCLUSIONS: Our directly comparable estimates of the emergence of reactivity for 20 immunoassays are valuable to testing providers for interpreting negative HIV test results obtained shortly after exposure, and for counseling individuals on when to retest after an exposure. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2016. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
BACKGROUND: Understanding the period of time between an exposure resulting in infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and when a test can reliably detect the presence of that infection, that is, the test window period, may benefit testing programs and clinicians in counseling patients about when the clinician and the patient can be confident a suspected exposure did not result in HIV infection. METHODS: We evaluated the intervals between reactivity of the Aptima HIV-1 RNA test (Aptima) and 20 US Food and Drug Administration-approved HIV immunoassays using 222 longitudinally collected plasma specimens from HIV-1 seroconverters from the United States. Using interval-censored survival and binomial regression approaches a multi-model framework was implemented to estimate the relative emergence of test reactivity, referred to here as an inter-test reactivity interval (ITRI). We then combined ITRI results with simulated data for the eclipse period, the time between exposure and detection of HIV virus by Aptima, to estimate the window period for each test. RESULTS: The estimated ITRIs were shorter with each new class of HIV tests, ranging from 5.9 to 24.8 days. The 99th percentiles of the window period probability distribution ranged from 44 days for laboratory screening tests that detect both antigen and antibody to 65 days for the Western blot test. CONCLUSIONS: Our directly comparable estimates of the emergence of reactivity for 20 immunoassays are valuable to testing providers for interpreting negative HIV test results obtained shortly after exposure, and for counseling individuals on when to retest after an exposure. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2016. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
Entities:
Keywords:
HIV eclipse period; HIV immunoassays; RNA nucleic acid test; window period of infection
Authors: Mars Stone; John Bainbridge; Ana M Sanchez; Sheila M Keating; Andrea Pappas; Wes Rountree; Chris Todd; Sonia Bakkour; Mark Manak; Sheila A Peel; Robert W Coombs; Eric M Ramos; M Kathleen Shriver; Paul Contestable; Sangeetha Vijaysri Nair; David H Wilson; Martin Stengelin; Gary Murphy; Indira Hewlett; Thomas N Denny; Michael P Busch Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2018-07-26 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: John W Hargrove; Cari van Schalkwyk; Jean H Humphrey; Kuda Mutasa; Robert Ntozini; Sherry Michele Owen; Silvina Masciotra; Bharat S Parekh; Yen T Duong; Trudy Dobbs; Peter H Kilmarx; Elizabeth Gonese Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2017-05-24 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Brian Custer; Claire Quiner; Richard Haaland; Amy Martin; Mars Stone; Rita Reik; Whitney R Steele; Debra Kessler; Phillip C Williamson; Steven A Anderson; Alan E Williams; Henry F Raymond; Willi McFarland; William T Robinson; Sara Glick; Kwa Sey; C David Melton; Simone A Glynn; Susan L Stramer; Michael P Busch Journal: Blood Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Christopher D Pilcher; Travis C Porco; Shelley N Facente; Eduard Grebe; Kevin P Delaney; Silvina Masciotra; Reshma Kassanjee; Michael P Busch; Gary Murphy; S Michele Owen; Alex Welte Journal: AIDS Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Javier Lopez-Rios; Timothy Frasca; Marcia J Kindlon; Theresa M Exner; Andrea Norcini Pala; Milton L Wainberg; Yvette Calderon; Richard Cotroneo; Arismendi A Jiménez; Robert H Remien Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2019-10
Authors: Joanne D Stekler; Kenneth Tapia; Janine Maenza; Claire E Stevens; George A Ure; Joshua D O'Neal; Aric Lane; James I Mullins; Robert W Coombs; Sarah Holte; Ann C Collier Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2018-06-13 Impact factor: 2.205