Literature DB >> 27737770

Swarm intelligence in fish? The difficulty in demonstrating distributed and self-organised collective intelligence in (some) animal groups.

Christos C Ioannou1.   

Abstract

Larger groups often have a greater ability to solve cognitive tasks compared to smaller ones or lone individuals. This is well established in social insects, navigating flocks of birds, and in groups of prey collectively vigilant for predators. Research in social insects has convincingly shown that improved cognitive performance can arise from self-organised local interactions between individuals that integrates their contributions, often referred to as swarm intelligence. This emergent collective intelligence has gained in popularity and been directly applied to groups of other animals, including fish. Despite being a likely mechanism at least partially explaining group performance in vertebrates, I argue here that other possible explanations are rarely ruled out in empirical studies. Hence, evidence for self-organised collective (or 'swarm') intelligence in fish is not as strong as it would first appear. These other explanations, the 'pool-of-competence' and the greater cognitive ability of individuals when in larger groups, are also reviewed. Also discussed is why improved group performance in general may be less often observed in animals such as shoaling fish compared to social insects. This review intends to highlight the difficulties in exploring collective intelligence in animal groups, ideally leading to further empirical work to illuminate these issues.
Copyright © 2016 The Author. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Collective cognition; Collective intelligence; Many wrongs; Quorum; Swarm intelligence; Wisdom of crowds

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27737770     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  10 in total

1.  Counteracting estimation bias and social influence to improve the wisdom of crowds.

Authors:  Albert B Kao; Andrew M Berdahl; Andrew T Hartnett; Matthew J Lutz; Joseph B Bak-Coleman; Christos C Ioannou; Xingli Giam; Iain D Couzin
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Collective decision-making appears more egalitarian in populations where group fission costs are higher.

Authors:  J E Herbert-Read; A S I Wade; I W Ramnarine; C C Ioannou
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  High-predation habitats affect the social dynamics of collective exploration in a shoaling fish.

Authors:  Christos C Ioannou; Indar W Ramnarine; Colin J Torney
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  Emergence of leadership in a robotic fish group under diverging individual personality traits.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Xiaojie Chen; Guangming Xie; Ming Cao
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Anthropogenic noise pollution from pile-driving disrupts the structure and dynamics of fish shoals.

Authors:  James E Herbert-Read; Louise Kremer; Rick Bruintjes; Andrew N Radford; Christos C Ioannou
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  How the wisdom of crowds, and of the crowd within, are affected by expertise.

Authors:  Joshua L Fiechter; Nate Kornell
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-02-05

7.  Biological Entanglement-Like Effect After Communication of Fish Prior to X-Ray Exposure.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Richard Smith; Jiaxi Wang; Andrej Rusin; Cris Fernandez-Palomo; Jennifer Fazzari; Colin Seymour
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Collective gradient sensing in fish schools.

Authors:  James G Puckett; Aawaz R Pokhrel; Julia A Giannini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Collective animal navigation and migratory culture: from theoretical models to empirical evidence.

Authors:  Andrew M Berdahl; Albert B Kao; Andrea Flack; Peter A H Westley; Edward A Codling; Iain D Couzin; Anthony I Dell; Dora Biro
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Adolescents show collective intelligence which can be driven by a geometric mean rule of thumb.

Authors:  Christos C Ioannou; Gabriel Madirolas; Faith S Brammer; Hannah A Rapley; Gonzalo G de Polavieja
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.