| Literature DB >> 27737705 |
Ludmila Juhásová1, Ivica Králová-Hromadová2, Eva Bazsalovicsová1, Gabriel Minárik3,4,5, Jan Štefka6, Peter Mikulíček7, Lenka Pálková4, Margo Pybus8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fascioloides magna (Trematoda: Fasciolidae) is an important liver parasite of a wide range of free-living and domestic ruminants; it represents a remarkable species due to its large spatial distribution, invasive character, and potential to colonize new territories. The present study provides patterns of population genetic structure and admixture in F. magna across all enzootic regions in North America and natural foci in Europe, and infers migratory routes of the parasite on both continents.Entities:
Keywords: Fascioloides magna; Genetic interrelationships; Giant liver fluke; Microsatellites; Migratory routes; Parasite
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27737705 PMCID: PMC5064932 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1811-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Details on final hosts and geographical localities of Fascioloides magna from North America analysed in the present study
| Na | Nb | Liver code | Final host | Locality | Geographical coordinates | USA state/ CA province | Enzootic region |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 3 | OR-33 |
| Salem | 44°56′N, 123°02′W | USA Oregon (OR) | northern Pacific coast (NPC) |
| 4 | 3 | BC-1 |
| Vancouver Island | 49°00′N, 127°00′W | Canada British Columbia (BC) | |
| 1 | BC-2 | ||||||
| 89 | 10 | AB-1 |
| Banff National | 51°12′N, 115°35′W | Canada | Rocky |
| 3 | AB-2 | ||||||
| 6 | AB-3 | ||||||
| 3 | AB-4 | ||||||
| 4 | AB-6 | ||||||
| 9 | AB-7 | ||||||
| 8 | AB-9 | ||||||
| 8 | AB-11 | ||||||
| 11 | AB-12 | ||||||
| 7 | AB-13 | ||||||
| 3 | AB-14 | ||||||
| 1 | AB-15 | ||||||
| 3 | AB-17 | ||||||
| 4 | AB-18 | ||||||
| 1 | AB-1a | ||||||
| 2 | AB-2a | ||||||
| 2 | AB-3a | ||||||
| 2 | AB-4a | ||||||
| 2 | AB-5a | ||||||
| 12 | 1 | QC-1 |
| Kuujjuaq | 58°44′N, 70°02′W | Canada Quebec (QC) | northern Quebec and Labrador (NQL) |
| 5 | QC-2 | ||||||
| 4 | QC-3 | ||||||
| 2 | QC-4 | ||||||
| 1 | 1 | NL-3 |
| northern | 53°55′N, 60°44′W | Canada | |
| 14 | 1 | MN-1 |
| Erskine, Hibbing | 47°40′N, 96°00′W | USA | Great Lakes region (GLR) |
| 4 | 4 | GA-31 |
| Georgia | 32°48′N, 83°09′W | USA | Gulf Coast, Lower |
| 3 | 3 | MS-35 |
| River Valley | 32°32′N, 91°22′W | USA | |
| 15 | 4 | FL-36 |
| White Oak plantation | 30°44′N, 81°45′W | USA | |
| 3 | 3 | LA-39 |
| Tensas National | 32°03′N, 91°15′W | USA | |
| 28 | 5 | SC-40 |
| Savannah River | 34°26′N, 82°51′W | USA | |
| 5 | SC-41 | ||||||
| 8 | SC-42 | ||||||
| 7 | SC-43 | ||||||
| 3 | SC-45 | ||||||
| 176 | 38 | total |
N number of F. magna specimens from the respective USA state or Canadian (CA) province
N number of flukes analysed from the respective final host individual
Details on final hosts and geographical localities of Fascioloides magna from Europe analysed in the current study
| Na | Nb | Liver code | Final host | Locality | Geographical coordinates | European country | Natural focus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51 | 3 | IT-1 |
| Regional Park | 45°7′N, 7°38′E | Italy (IT) | Italy (IT) |
| 3 | IT-2 | ||||||
| 2 | IT-3 | ||||||
| 6 | IT-4 | ||||||
| 5 | IT-5 | ||||||
| 3 | IT-7 | ||||||
| 1 | IT-8 | ||||||
| 3 | IT-10 | ||||||
| 4 | IT-11 | ||||||
| 5 | IT-12 | ||||||
| 1 | IT-13 | ||||||
| 1 | IT-14 | ||||||
| 1 | IT-15 | ||||||
| 2 | IT-16 | ||||||
| 1 | IT-17 | ||||||
| 2 | IT-18 | ||||||
| 3 | IT-19 | ||||||
| 4 | IT-20 | ||||||
| 1 | IT-21 | ||||||
| 101 | 1 | CZ-1 |
| Křivoklát Mountains, Křivoklát | 50°02′N, 13°52′E | Czech Republic (CZ) | Czech |
| 3 | CZ-2 | Brdy Mountains, Mirošov | 49°41′N, 13°39′E | ||||
| 1 | CZ-3 | Brdy Mountains, Brdy | 49°43′N, 13°55′E | ||||
| 8 | CZ-4 | Brdy Mountains, Beroun | 49°57′N, 14°04′E | ||||
| 12 | CZ-5 | Křivoklát Mountains, Křivoklát | 50°02′N, 13°52′E | ||||
| 1 | CZ-6 | Bohemian Forest, Chvalšiny | 48°52′N, 14°11′E | ||||
| 4 | CZ-7 | Bohemian Forest, Chvalšiny | 48°52′N, 14°11′E | ||||
| 2 | CZ-8 | Bohemian Forest, Květušín | 48°47'N, 14°08'E | ||||
| 5 | CZ-9 | Brdy Mountains, Mirošov | 49°41′N, 13°39′E | ||||
| 5 | CZ-10 | Bohemian Forest, Nové Údolí | 48°49′N, 13°47′E | ||||
| 4 | CZ-11 | Brdy Mountains, Mirošov | 49°41′N, 13°39′E | ||||
| 2 | CZ-12 | Bohemian Forest, Chvalšiny | 48°52′N, 14°11′E | ||||
| 3 | CZ-13 | Brdy Mountains, Mirošov | 49°41′N, 13°39′E | ||||
| 4 | CZ-14 | Hostýnske Mountains, Chvalčov | 49°23′N, 17°42′E | ||||
| 2 | CZ-15 | Bohemian Forest, Květušín | 48°47'N, 14°08'E | ||||
| 4 | CZ-16 | Bohemian Forest, Květušín | 48°47'N, 14°08'E | ||||
| 2 | CZ-17 | Hostýnske Mountains, Chvalčov | 49°23′N, 17°42′E | ||||
| 4 | CZ-18 | Bohemian Forest, Prášily | 49°06′N, 13°23′E | ||||
| 2 | CZ-19 | Bohemian Forest, Chvalšiny | 48°52′N, 14°11′E | ||||
| 4 | CZ-20 | Bohemian Forest, Horní Planá | 48°46′N, 14°01′E | ||||
| 2 | CZ-21 | Bohemian Forest, Horní Planá | 48°46′N, 14°01′E | ||||
| 3 | CZ-22 | Bohemian Forest, Horní Planá | 48°46′N, 14°01′E | ||||
| 3 | CZ-23 | Bohemian Forest, Chvalšiny | 48°52′N, 14°11′E | ||||
| 3 | CZ-24 | Bohemian Forest, Horní Planá | 48°46′N, 14°01′E | ||||
| 4 | CZ-25 | Bohemian Forest, Chvalšiny | 48°52′N, 14°11′E | ||||
| 5 | CZ-26 | Brdy Mountains, Mirošov | 49°41′N, 13°39′E | ||||
| 4 | CZ-27 | Bohemian Forest, Boletice | 48°49′N, 14°13′E | ||||
| 4 | CZ-28 | Bohemian Forest, Chvalšiny | 48°52′N, 14°11′E | ||||
| 4 | 1 | PL-1 |
| Lower Silesian Wilderness | 51°22′N, 15°07′E | Poland (PL) | |
| 1 | PL-2 | ||||||
| 1 | PL-3 | ||||||
| 1 | PL-5 | ||||||
| 46 | 3 | SR-1 |
| Čičov | 47°46′N, 17°46′E | Slovakia (SK) | Danube |
| 14 | SR-2 | Kravany | 47°46′N, 18°29′E | ||||
| 16 | SR-16 | Bodíky | 47°55′N, 17°27′E | ||||
| 13 | SR-22 | Bodíky | 47°55′N, 17°27′E | ||||
| 20 | 2 | HU-1 |
| Szigetkӧz | 47°51′N, 17°27′E | Hungary (HU) | |
| 2 | HU-2 | ||||||
| 2 | HU-3 | ||||||
| 2 | HU-4 | ||||||
| 2 | HU-5 | ||||||
| 2 | HU-6 | ||||||
| 2 | HU-7 | ||||||
| 2 | HU-8 | ||||||
| 2 | HU-9 | ||||||
| 2 | HU-10 | ||||||
| 34 | 1 | CR-4 |
| Slavonia, Tikveš | 45°40′N, 18°51′E | Croatia (CR) | |
| 1 | CR-6 | ||||||
| 2 | CR-10 | ||||||
| 6 | CR-12 | ||||||
| 7 | CR-13 | ||||||
| 6 | CR-14 | ||||||
| 7 | CR-15 | ||||||
| 1 | CR-17 | ||||||
| 3 | CR-23 | ||||||
| 256 | 74 | total |
N number of F. magna specimens from the respective European country
N number of flukes analysed from the respective final host individual
Descriptive statistics for 11 microsatellite loci of Fascioloides magna from North America and Europe
| Region/focusa | Na | Ne | Ho | uHe | F | %P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NPC | mean | 2.636 | 1.939 | 0.260 | 0.375 | 0.283 | |
| SE | 0.527 | 0.384 | 0.090 | 0.088 | 0.146 | ||
| 73 | |||||||
| RMT | mean | 6.182 | 2.822 | 0.446 | 0.584 | 0.203 | |
| SE | 1.077 | 0.340 | 0.052 | 0.064 | 0.048 | ||
| 100 | |||||||
| NQL | mean | 3.000 | 1.944 | 0.357 | 0.353 | −0.070 | |
| SE | 0.647 | 0.348 | 0.097 | 0.093 | 0.072 | ||
| 73 | |||||||
| GLR | mean | 5.455 | 3.682 | 0.588 | 0.656 | 0.124 | |
| SE | 0.835 | 0.599 | 0.088 | 0.069 | 0.117 | ||
| 100 | |||||||
| SAS | mean | 6.818 | 3.734 | 0.474 | 0.648 | 0.282 | |
| SE | 1.271 | 0.654 | 0.070 | 0.055 | 0.083 | ||
| 100 | |||||||
| IT | mean | 3.091 | 1.845 | 0.335 | 0.337 | 0.020 | |
| SE | 0.667 | 0.294 | 0.087 | 0.083 | 0.065 | ||
| 82 | |||||||
| CZ-PL | mean | 5.727 | 3.524 | 0.581 | 0.655 | 0.142 | |
| SE | 0.776 | 0.456 | 0.080 | 0.059 | 0.086 | ||
| 100 | |||||||
| DFF | mean | 3.636 | 2.070 | 0.401 | 0.459 | 0.190 | |
| SE | 0.432 | 0.237 | 0.064 | 0.058 | 0.094 | ||
| 100 |
aCodes for North American enzootic regions and European natural foci are explained in Tables 1 and 2, respectively
Abbreviations: Na number of different alleles, Ne number of effective alleles, Ho observed heterozygosity, uHe unbiased expected heterozygosity, F fixation index, %P percentage of polymorphic loci, SE standard error
Fig. 1Bar plots from program STRUCTURE assigning all 432 Fascioloides magna individuals from North America (NA) and Europe (EU) into K = 2, 4 and 8 clusters and detailed structure of SAS region. Codes for NA enzootic regions, US states/Canadian province and EU natural foci are explained in Tables 1 and 2, respectively
Fig. 2Genetic population structure of Fascioloides magna from all North American (NA) and European (EU) populations (a), and interrelationships among NA populations (b-d) derived from PRINCIPAL COORDINATES ANALYSIS (PCoA). Circles, EU natural foci; squares, NA enzootic regions. a All NA and EU populations. b All NA populations. c Eastern NA clade inferred from mt data (Bazsalovicsová et al. [10]). d West-east NA lineage derived from MIGRATE analysis of microsatellites (present study). Codes for NA enzootic regions and EU natural foci are explained in Tables 1 and 2, respectively
Fig. 3Genetic population structure of Fascioloides magna from European (EU) populations (a) and interrelationships between EU and North American (NA) populations (b-d) based on the PRINCIPAL COORDINATES ANALYSIS (PCoA). Circles, EU natural foci; squares, NA enzootic regions. a Interrelationships between F. magna from Czech-Polish (CZ-PL) and Danube floodplain forests (DFF) foci. b Relatedness between flukes from Italy (IT) and western NA regions (RMT and NPC). c Comparison between F. magna from CZ-PL and particular states of SAS. d Differentiation of DFF from all NA enzootic regions. Codes for NA enzootic regions and EU natural foci are explained in Tables 1 and 2, respectively
Fig. 4Unrooted neighbour-joining (NJ) evolutionary tree based on pairwise DA distances among Fascioloides magna from Europe (EU) and North America (NA). a Tree representing F. magna from NA enzootic regions and EU natural foci. b Tree displaying F. magna from US states, Canadian provinces and EU countries coloured according to their respective region/locus. Dotted ovals, closest interrelationships between EU and NA populations. Codes for NA enzootic regions and EU natural foci are explained in Tables 1 and 2, respectively
Fig. 5Schematic reconstruction of transmission routes between North American (NA) and European (EU) populations of Fascioloides magna, and determination of the origin of EU populations derived from mtDNA haplotypes (Králová-Hromadová et al. [11]) and microsatellite analysis
Fig. 6Schematic presentation of the most possible scenarios of migration routes of F. magna on both continents using MIGRATE
Analyses of population size changes. Wilcoxon sign-rank tests for heterozygosity excess in native and introduced areas of Fascioloides magna under a two-phase model (TPM) and stepwise mutation model (SMM) from BOTTLENECK and coalescent estimates of Theta (Θ) for source and introduced F. magna populations
| Focus/regiona | ||||
| BOTTLENECK | TPM | SMM | ||
| Hex/Ht |
| Hex/Ht |
| |
| RMT | 4/11 (36.4 %) | 0.320 | 4/11 (36.4 %) | 0.102 |
| IT | 4/9* (44.4 %) | 0.652 | 4/9* (44.4 %) | 0.496 |
| SAS | 4/11 (36.4 %) | 0.764 | 4/11 (36.4 %) | 0.148 |
| CZ | 7/11 (63.6 %) | 0.102 | 7/11 (63.6 %) | 0.577 |
| DFF | 6/11 (54.5 %) | 0.966 | 5/11 (45.5 %) | 0.700 |
| Focus/region | ||||
| MIGRATE | 2.5 % |
| 97.5 % |
|
| NPC | 0 |
| 26.880 |
|
| IT | 0 |
| 2.120 |
|
| SC | 0.133 |
| 6.933 |
|
| CZ | 0 |
| 5.600 |
|
| SK | 0 |
| 3.600 |
|
| HU | 0 |
| 4.133 |
|
| CR | 0 |
| 4.667 |
|
aCodes for North American enzootic regions and European natural foci are explained in Tables 1 and 2, respectively
BOTTLENECK notes: *two loci out of 11 analysed were monomorphic in the IT population, Hex/Ht ratio of the number of loci with a heterozygosity excess to the total number of analysed polymorphic loci, P statistical significance of any deviation from equilibrium expectations
MIGRATE notes: 2.5 and 97.5 % demarcate the 95 % confidence interval of Theta estimates, italicized numbers the mode and mean values of Theta. MIGRATE estimates for NPC and IT, and for SC, CZ, SK, HU and CR originated from two separate runs