| Literature DB >> 27737694 |
Brett L Bruyere1, Jonathan Trimarco2, Saruni Lemungesi2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Samburu region of northern Kenya is undergoing significant change, driven by factors including greater value on formal education, improvements in infrastructure and development, a shift from community to private ownership of land, increased sedentary lifestyles and global climate change. One outcome of these changes are an increasingly greater likelihood for adolescent boys to be enrolled in school rather than herding livestock on behalf of the family in a landscape shared with numerous native vegetation and wildlife species.Entities:
Keywords: Kenya; Local knowledge; Moran; Pastoralism; Plants; Samburu; Traditional ecological knowledge
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27737694 PMCID: PMC5064920 DOI: 10.1186/s13002-016-0121-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed ISSN: 1746-4269 Impact factor: 2.733
Fig. 1Archer’s Post, Samburu County, Kenya
Average number of total plants identified for students and moran
| Students/Moran |
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Students | Moran | ||||
| Plants identified | x̅ | 20.18 | 38.04 | 7.15 | <.01 |
| sd | 9.78 | 9.19 | |||
Difference between number of culturally significant plants identified by students and moran
| Group |
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Student | Moran | ||||
| Total # culturally important species identifieda | x̅ | 8.61 | 12.87 | 6.30 | <.01 |
| Sd | 3.32 | 1.69 | |||
aOut of a maximum of 15
Differences in percentage of students and moran that correctly identified culturally important plants by species
| Species: | Correctly identifieda |
| Sig. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Student | Moran | |||
| Lawai (Ekurchanalt) | 81.3 % | 100 % | 5.04 | <.03 |
| Ldupai (Emojo) | 68.8 % | 100 % | 9.13 | <.01 |
| Lgiriai (Ethajait) | 75 % | 100 % | 6.73 | <.01 |
| Lpupoi (Engumo) | 81.3 % | 100 % | 5.04 | <.03 |
| Lominira (Ekaretrete) | 18.8 % | 95.2 % | 29.68 | <.01 |
| Lordanyai (Lorkirdanyai) | 21.9 % | 43.5 % | 2.92 | >.08 |
| Lparuai (Engwael) | 87.5 % | 100 % | 3.23 | >.07 |
| Ltepes (Etiir & Ewoi) | 96.9 % | 100 % | 0.76 | >.38 |
| Ngirman (Egong) | 32.3 % | 69.6 % | 7.88 | <.01 |
| Sakurdumi (Emoni) | 18.8 % | 62.5 % | 11.20 | <.01 |
| Sakurtuti (Lobara) | 9.3 % | 58.3 % | 15.55 | <.01 |
| Salapani (Etuntun) | 71.9 % | 100 % | 7.73 | <.01 |
| Serichoi (Edung) | 53.1 % | 95.5 % | 11.20 | <.01 |
| Sukuroi (Echuchuka) | 87.5 % | 100 % | 3.10 | >.07 |
| Sumanderi (Ethimanderi) | 59.4 % | 95.8 % | 9.72 | <.01 |
aPercentage of participants in social group (student of w) that correctly identified species
Average number of facts recalled about culturally important plants by students and moran
| Group |
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Student | Moran | ||||
| Total # factsa | x̅ | 10.28 | 17.87 | 3.63 | <.01 |
| Sd | 6.18 | 9.32 | |||
aTotal number of correctly recalled facts about plants across all 15 species
Assessment of herding frequency as a predictor of plants identification
| Standardized regression coefficient (β) |
| Sig. |
| Adjusted | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 1.28 | .21 | 22.42 | .30 | |
| Herding Frequency | .56 | 4.74 | <.01 |