Michael P Chu1, J Randolph Hecht2, Dennis Slamon2, Zev A Wainberg2, Yung-Jue Bang3, Paulo M Hoff4, Alberto Sobrero5, Shukui Qin6, Karen Afenjar7, Vincent Houe8, Karen King1, Sheryl Koski1, Karen Mulder1, Julie Price Hiller1, Andrew Scarfe1, Jennifer Spratlin1, Yingjie J Huang9, Saba Khan-Wasti9, Neil Chua1, Michael B Sawyer1. 1. Cross Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. 2. Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Clinical and Translational Research, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 4. Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Universidade de Sao Paolo, Sao Paolo, Brazil. 5. IRCCS Ospedale San Martino IST, Medical Oncology, Largo Benzi 10 Genova, 16132, Italy. 6. Department of Oncology, The 81 Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Nanjing, China. 7. Project Management, Translational Research in Oncology (TRIO), Paris, France. 8. Department of Biostatistics, TRIO, Paris, France. 9. Department of Research and Development Projects, Clinical Platforms and Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Middlesex, United Kingdom.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Capecitabine is an oral cytotoxic chemotherapeutic commonly used across cancer subtypes. As with other oral medications though, it may suffer from drug interactions that could impair its absorption. OBJECTIVE: To determine if gastric acid suppressants such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may impair capecitabine efficacy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This secondary analysis of TRIO-013, a phase III randomized trial, compares capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOx) with or without lapatinib in 545 patients with ERBB2/HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal cancer (GEC); patients were randomized 1:1 between CapeOx with or without lapatinib. Proton pump inhibitor use was identified by medication records. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients treated with PPIs vs patients who were not. Specific subgroups were accounted for, such as younger age (<60 years), Asian ethnicity, female sex, and disease stage (metastatic/advanced) in multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling. The TRIO-013 trial accrued and randomized patients between June 2008 and January 2012; this analysis took place in January 2014. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were divided based on PPI exposure. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary study outcome was PFS and OS between patients treated with PPIs vs patients who were not. Secondary outcomes included disease response rates and toxicities. RESULTS: Of the 545 patients with GEC (median age, 60 years; 406 men [74%]) included in the study, 229 received PPIs (42.0%) and were evenly distributed between arms. In the placebo arm, PPI-treated patients had poorer median PFS, 4.2 vs 5.7 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.55; 95% CI, 1.29-1.81, P < .001); OS, 9.2 vs 11.3 months (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.06-1.62; P = .04); and disease control rate (83% vs 72%; P = .02) vs patients not treated with PPIs. In multivariate analysis considering age, race, disease stage, and sex, PPI-treated patients had poorer PFS (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.42-1.94; P < .001) and OS (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.11-1.71; P = .001). In patients treated with CapeOx and lapatinib, PPIs had less effect on PFS (HR, 1.08; P = .54) and OS (HR, 1.26; P = .10); however, multivariate analysis in this group demonstrated a significant difference in OS (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.06-1.66; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Proton pump inhibitors negatively effected capecitabine efficacy by possibly raising gastric pH levels, leading to altered dissolution and absorption. These results are consistent with previous erlotinib and sunitinib studies. Whether PPIs affected lapatinib is unclear given concurrent capecitabine. Given capecitabine's prevalence in treatment breast cancer and colon cancer, further studies are under way. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00680901.
IMPORTANCE: Capecitabine is an oral cytotoxic chemotherapeutic commonly used across cancer subtypes. As with other oral medications though, it may suffer from drug interactions that could impair its absorption. OBJECTIVE: To determine if gastric acid suppressants such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may impair capecitabine efficacy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This secondary analysis of TRIO-013, a phase III randomized trial, compares capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOx) with or without lapatinib in 545 patients with ERBB2/HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal cancer (GEC); patients were randomized 1:1 between CapeOx with or without lapatinib. Proton pump inhibitor use was identified by medication records. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients treated with PPIs vs patients who were not. Specific subgroups were accounted for, such as younger age (<60 years), Asian ethnicity, female sex, and disease stage (metastatic/advanced) in multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling. The TRIO-013 trial accrued and randomized patients between June 2008 and January 2012; this analysis took place in January 2014. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were divided based on PPI exposure. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary study outcome was PFS and OS between patients treated with PPIs vs patients who were not. Secondary outcomes included disease response rates and toxicities. RESULTS: Of the 545 patients with GEC (median age, 60 years; 406 men [74%]) included in the study, 229 received PPIs (42.0%) and were evenly distributed between arms. In the placebo arm, PPI-treated patients had poorer median PFS, 4.2 vs 5.7 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.55; 95% CI, 1.29-1.81, P < .001); OS, 9.2 vs 11.3 months (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.06-1.62; P = .04); and disease control rate (83% vs 72%; P = .02) vs patients not treated with PPIs. In multivariate analysis considering age, race, disease stage, and sex, PPI-treated patients had poorer PFS (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.42-1.94; P < .001) and OS (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.11-1.71; P = .001). In patients treated with CapeOx and lapatinib, PPIs had less effect on PFS (HR, 1.08; P = .54) and OS (HR, 1.26; P = .10); however, multivariate analysis in this group demonstrated a significant difference in OS (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.06-1.66; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Proton pump inhibitors negatively effected capecitabine efficacy by possibly raising gastric pH levels, leading to altered dissolution and absorption. These results are consistent with previous erlotinib and sunitinib studies. Whether PPIs affected lapatinib is unclear given concurrent capecitabine. Given capecitabine's prevalence in treatment breast cancer and colon cancer, further studies are under way. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00680901.
Authors: Dongyun Yang; Andrew Hendifar; Cosima Lenz; Kayo Togawa; Felicitas Lenz; Georg Lurje; Alexandra Pohl; Thomas Winder; Yan Ning; Susan Groshen; Heinz-Josef Lenz Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2011-06
Authors: N R Budha; A Frymoyer; G S Smelick; J Y Jin; M R Yago; M J Dresser; S N Holden; L Z Benet; J A Ware Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: J Randolph Hecht; Yung-Jue Bang; Shukui K Qin; Hyun C Chung; Jianming M Xu; Joon O Park; Krzysztof Jeziorski; Yaroslav Shparyk; Paulo M Hoff; Alberto Sobrero; Pamela Salman; Jin Li; Svetlana A Protsenko; Zev A Wainberg; Marc Buyse; Karen Afenjar; Vincent Houé; Agathe Garcia; Tomomi Kaneko; Yingjie Huang; Saba Khan-Wasti; Sergio Santillana; Michael F Press; Dennis Slamon Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: B Reigner; S Clive; J Cassidy; D Jodrell; R Schulz; T Goggin; L Banken; B Roos; M Utoh; T Mulligan; E Weidekamm Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 1999 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Sun Young Kim; Ji Sung Lee; Junho Kang; Satoshi Morita; Young Suk Park; Junichi Sakamoto; Kei Muro; Rui-Hua Xu; Tae Won Kim Journal: Oncologist Date: 2021-03-23
Authors: Andrew Whitman; Kathlene DeGregory; Amy Morris; Supriya Mohile; Erika Ramsdale Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 3.603