Literature DB >> 27736763

Using MRSA Screening Tests To Predict Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Guillaume Butler-Laporte1, Matthew P Cheng2, Alexandre P Cheng3, Emily G McDonald4,5, Todd C Lee4,2,5.   

Abstract

Bloodstream infections with Staphylococcus aureus are clinically significant and are often treated with empirical methicillin resistance (MRSA, methicillin-resistant S. aureus) coverage. However, vancomycin has associated harms. We hypothesized that MRSA screening correlated with resistance in S. aureus bacteremia and could help determine the requirement for empirical vancomycin therapy. We reviewed consecutive S. aureus bacteremias over a 5-year period at two tertiary care hospitals. MRSA colonization was evaluated in three ways: as tested within 30 days of bacteremia (30-day criterion), as tested within 30 days but accounting for any prior positive results (ever-positive criterion), or as tested in known-positive patients, with patients with unknown MRSA status being labeled negative (known-positive criterion). There were 409 S. aureus bacteremias: 302 (73.8%) methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and 107 (26.2%) MRSA bacteremias. In the 167 patients with MSSA bacteremias, 7.2% had a positive MRSA test within 30 days. Of 107 patients with MRSA bacteremia, 68 were tested within 30 days (54 positive; 79.8%), and another 21 (19.6%) were previously positive. The 30-day criterion provided negative predictive values (NPV) exceeding 90% and 95% if the prevalence of MRSA in S. aureus bacteremia was less than 33.4% and 19.2%, respectively. The same NPVs were predicted at MRSA proportions below 39.7% and 23.8%, respectively, for the ever-positive criterion and 34.4% and 19.9%, respectively, for the known-positive criterion. In MRSA-colonized patients, positive predictive values exceeded 50% at low prevalence. MRSA screening could help avoid empirical vancomycin therapy and its complications in stable patients and settings with low-to-moderate proportions of MRSA bacteremia.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27736763      PMCID: PMC5119028          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01751-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  12 in total

1.  Increasing vancomycin serum trough concentrations and incidence of nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  Lindsey Pritchard; Catherine Baker; James Leggett; Paul Sehdev; Allen Brown; K Bruce Bayley
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 2.  Management of multidrug-resistant organisms in health care settings, 2006.

Authors:  Jane D Siegel; Emily Rhinehart; Marguerite Jackson; Linda Chiarello
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  Comparative effectiveness of beta-lactams versus vancomycin for treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections among 122 hospitals.

Authors:  Jennifer S McDanel; Eli N Perencevich; Daniel J Diekema; Loreen A Herwaldt; Tara C Smith; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Jeffrey D Dawson; Lan Jiang; Michihiko Goto; Marin L Schweizer
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Can Nasal Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Screening Be Used to Avoid Empiric Vancomycin Use in Intra-Abdominal Infection?

Authors:  Sara A Hennessy; Puja M Shah; Christopher A Guidry; Stephen W Davies; Tjasa Hranjec; Robert G Sawyer
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 2.150

5.  National prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in inpatients at United States health care facilities, 2010.

Authors:  William R Jarvis; Ashley A Jarvis; Raymond Y Chinn
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.918

6.  Utility of prior screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in predicting resistance of S. aureus infections.

Authors:  Derek R MacFadden; Marion Elligsen; Ari Robicsek; Daniel R Ricciuto; Nick Daneman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Strategies to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission and infection in acute care hospitals: 2014 update.

Authors:  David P Calfee; Cassandra D Salgado; Aaron M Milstone; Anthony D Harris; David T Kuhar; Julia Moody; Kathy Aureden; Susan S Huang; Lisa L Maragakis; Deborah S Yokoe
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.254

8.  Nasal MRSA screening for surgical patients: predictive value for postoperative infections caused by MRSA.

Authors:  Yutaka Matsubara; Hideaki Uchiyama; Takahiro Higashi; Ai Edagawa; Hirokuni Ishii; Shigeyuki Nagata; Kenkichi Hashimoto; Daihiko Eguchi; Hirofumi Kawanaka; Toshirou Okuyama; Masahiro Tateishi; Daisuke Korenaga; Kenji Takenaka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  A trial of discontinuation of empiric vancomycin therapy in patients with suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus health care-associated pneumonia.

Authors:  John M Boyce; Olivia-Fabiola Pop; Odaliz Abreu-Lanfranco; Whitney Y Hung; Ann Fisher; Afshin Karjoo; Benjamin Thompson; Zenon Protopapas
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Comparison of mortality associated with methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sara E Cosgrove; George Sakoulas; Eli N Perencevich; Mitchell J Schwaber; Adolf W Karchmer; Yehuda Carmeli
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2002-12-13       Impact factor: 9.079

View more
  3 in total

1.  Daptomycin versus placebo as an adjunct to beta-lactam therapy in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Matthew P Cheng; Alexander Lawandi; Guillaume Butler-Laporte; Katryn Paquette; Todd C Lee
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 2.279

2.  Epidemiology of Community-Onset Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Authors:  James Y Yarovoy; Andrew A Monte; Bryan C Knepper; Heather L Young
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-04-16

3.  Screening swabs surpass traditional risk factors as predictors of MRSA bacteremia.

Authors:  Guillaume Butler-Laporte; Matthew P Cheng; Emily G McDonald; Todd C Lee
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.090

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.