Literature DB >> 27736735

Evaluation of the performance of accelerometer-based gait event detection algorithms in different real-world scenarios using the MAREA gait database.

Siddhartha Khandelwal1, Nicholas Wickström2.   

Abstract

Numerous gait event detection (GED) algorithms have been developed using accelerometers as they allow the possibility of long-term gait analysis in everyday life. However, almost all such existing algorithms have been developed and assessed using data collected in controlled indoor experiments with pre-defined paths and walking speeds. On the contrary, human gait is quite dynamic in the real-world, often involving varying gait speeds, changing surfaces and varying surface inclinations. Though portable wearable systems can be used to conduct experiments directly in the real-world, there is a lack of publicly available gait datasets or studies evaluating the performance of existing GED algorithms in various real-world settings. This paper presents a new gait database called MAREA (n=20 healthy subjects) that consists of walking and running in indoor and outdoor environments with accelerometers positioned on waist, wrist and both ankles. The study also evaluates the performance of six state-of-the-art accelerometer-based GED algorithms in different real-world scenarios, using the MAREA gait database. The results reveal that the performance of these algorithms is inconsistent and varies with changing environments and gait speeds. All algorithms demonstrated good performance for the scenario of steady walking in a controlled indoor environment with a combined median F1score of 0.98 for Heel-Strikes and 0.94 for Toe-Offs. However, they exhibited significantly decreased performance when evaluated in other lesser controlled scenarios such as walking and running in an outdoor street, with a combined median F1score of 0.82 for Heel-Strikes and 0.53 for Toe-Offs. Moreover, all GED algorithms displayed better performance for detecting Heel-Strikes as compared to Toe-Offs, when evaluated in different scenarios. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gait database; Gait events; Heel-Strike; Inertial sensors; Toe-Off

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27736735     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.09.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  17 in total

1.  Wearables for Running Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rachel Mason; Liam T Pearson; Gillian Barry; Fraser Young; Oisin Lennon; Alan Godfrey; Samuel Stuart
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 11.928

2.  Multimode optical fiber specklegram smart bed sensor array.

Authors:  Stephen C Warren-Smith; Adam D Kilpatrick; Kabish Wisal; Linh V Nguyen
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.758

3.  A Novel Accelerometer Mounting Method for Sensing Performance Improvement in Acoustic Measurements From the Knee.

Authors:  Goktug C Ozmen; Mohsen Safaei; Lan Lan; Omer T Inan
Journal:  J Vib Acoust       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 1.701

4.  Appropriate Mother Wavelets for Continuous Gait Event Detection Based on Time-Frequency Analysis for Hemiplegic and Healthy Individuals.

Authors:  Ning Ji; Hui Zhou; Kaifeng Guo; Oluwarotimi Williams Samuel; Zhen Huang; Lisheng Xu; Guanglin Li
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Intra-subject approach for gait-event prediction by neural network interpretation of EMG signals.

Authors:  Francesco Di Nardo; Christian Morbidoni; Guido Mascia; Federica Verdini; Sandro Fioretti
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Real-Life Gait Performance as a Digital Biomarker for Motor Fluctuations: The Parkinson@Home Validation Study.

Authors:  Luc Jw Evers; Yordan P Raykov; Jesse H Krijthe; Ana Lígia Silva de Lima; Reham Badawy; Kasper Claes; Tom M Heskes; Max A Little; Marjan J Meinders; Bastiaan R Bloem
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  The Impact of Environment on Gait Assessment: Considerations from Real-World Gait Analysis in Dementia Subtypes.

Authors:  Ríona Mc Ardle; Silvia Del Din; Paul Donaghy; Brook Galna; Alan J Thomas; Lynn Rochester
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  An Objective Methodology for the Selection of a Device for Continuous Mobility Assessment.

Authors:  Tecla Bonci; Alison Keogh; Silvia Del Din; Kirsty Scott; Claudia Mazzà
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Measuring Effects of Two-Handed Side and Anterior Load Carriage on Thoracic-Pelvic Coordination Using Wearable Gyroscopes.

Authors:  Sol Lim; Clive D'Souza
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Evaluating Pedometer Algorithms on Semi-Regular and Unstructured Gaits.

Authors:  Ryan Mattfeld; Elliot Jesch; Adam Hoover
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.