Literature DB >> 27736266

Effects of Plyometric Versus Concentric and Eccentric Conditioning Contractions on Upper-Body Postactivation Potentiation.

Gert Ulrich, Mario Parstorfer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There are limited data on postactivation potentiation's (PAP) effects after plyometric conditioning contractions (CCs), especially in the upper body. This study compared plyometric CCs with concentric-eccentric and eccentric CCs aiming to improve upper-body power performance due to a PAP effect.
METHODS: Sixteen resistance-trained males completed 3 experimental trials in a randomized order that comprised either a plyometric (PLY), a concentric-eccentric (CON), or an eccentric-only (ECC) CC. Maximal muscle performance, as determined by a ballistic bench-press throw, was measured before (baseline) and 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16 min after each CC.
RESULTS: Compared with baseline, bench-press power was significantly enhanced only in CON (P = .046, ES = 0.21) after 8 min of recovery. However, the results obtained from the comparisons between baseline power performance and the individual best power performance for each subject after each CC stimulus showed significant increases in PLY (P < .001, ES = 0.31) and CON (P < .001, ES = 0.38). There was no significant improvement in ECC (P = .106, ES = 0.11).
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that only CON CCs generated increases in bench-press power after 8 min of rest. However, considering an individual rest interval, PLY CCs led to an enhanced power performance in the bench-press exercise, and this increase was comparable to that induced by CON CCs. Due to the easy practical application before a competition, PLY CCs might be an interesting part of warm-up strategies aiming to improve upper-body power performance by reason of PAP.

Keywords:  complex training; contrast training; power; power development; preactivation; stretch-shortening cycle

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27736266     DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform        ISSN: 1555-0265            Impact factor:   4.010


  6 in total

1.  The impact of resistance exercise range of motion on the magnitude of upper-body post-activation performance enhancement.

Authors:  Michał Krzysztofik; Robert Trybulski; Bartosz Trąbka; Dawid Perenc; Konrad Łuszcz; Adam Zajac; Dan Iulian Alexe; Tatiana Dobrescu; Cristina Elena Moraru
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-07-07

Review 2.  Post-activation Potentiation Versus Post-activation Performance Enhancement in Humans: Historical Perspective, Underlying Mechanisms, and Current Issues.

Authors:  Anthony J Blazevich; Nicolas Babault
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) after a single bout of high-intensity flywheel resistance training.

Authors:  Sergio Maroto-Izquierdo; Iker J Bautista; Fernando Martín Rivera
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2020-07-05       Impact factor: 2.806

4.  Upper-Body Post-activation Performance Enhancement for Athletic Performance: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis and Recommendations for Future Research.

Authors:  Mitchell James Finlay; Craig Alan Bridge; Matt Greig; Richard Michael Page
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 11.928

5.  Swimming Warm-Up and Beyond: Dryland Protocols and Their Related Mechanisms-A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Francisco Cuenca-Fernández; Daniel Boullosa; Óscar López-Belmonte; Ana Gay; Jesús Juan Ruiz-Navarro; Raúl Arellano
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-09-24

6.  Post-Isometric Back Squat Performance Enhancement of Squat and Countermovement Jump.

Authors:  Michał Spieszny; Robert Trybulski; Piotr Biel; Adam Zając; Michał Krzysztofik
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.