Literature DB >> 27736049

High-Dose Citalopram and Escitalopram and the Risk of Out-of-Hospital Death.

Wayne A Ray1,2, Cecilia P Chung3, Katherine T Murray4,5, Kathi Hall2, C Michael Stein3,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Studies demonstrating that higher doses of citalopram (> 40 mg) and escitalopram (> 20 mg) prolong the corrected QT interval prompted regulatory agency warnings, which are controversial, given the absence of confirmatory clinical outcome studies. We compared the risk of potential arrhythmia-related deaths for high doses of these selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) to that for equivalent doses of fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline.
METHODS: The Tennessee Medicaid retrospective cohort study included 54,220 persons 30-74 years of age without cancer or other life-threatening illness who were prescribed high-dose SSRIs from 1998 through 2011. The mean age was 47 years, and 76% were female. Demographic characteristics and comorbidity for individual SSRIs were comparable. Because arrhythmia-related deaths are typically sudden and occur outside the hospital, we analyzed out-of-hospital sudden unexpected death as well as sudden cardiac deaths, a more specific indicator of proarrhythmic effects.
RESULTS: The adjusted risk of sudden unexpected death for citalopram did not differ significantly from that for the other SSRIs. The respective hazard ratios (HRs) for citalopram versus escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.40-1.75), 1.24 (95% CI, 0.75-2.05), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.45-1.24), and 1.53 (95% CI, 0.91-2.55). There were no significant differences for sudden cardiac death or all study deaths, nor were there significant differences among high-risk patients (≥ 60 years of age, upper quartile baseline cardiovascular risk). Escitalopram users had no significantly increased risk for any study end point.
CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that risk of sudden unexpected death, sudden cardiac death, or total mortality for high-dose citalopram and escitalopram differed significantly from that for comparable doses of fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline. © Copyright 2016 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27736049      PMCID: PMC5916769          DOI: 10.4088/JCP.15m10324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  28 in total

1.  Removal from labeling of 60-mg citalopram dose.

Authors:  Robert Temple; Thomas Laughren; Norman Stockbridge
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Cardiac safety concerns remain for citalopram at dosages above 40 mg/day.

Authors:  Steven T Bird; Victor Crentsil; Robert Temple; Simone Pinheiro; Dorothy Demczar; Marc Stone
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 3.  Citalopram, QTc interval prolongation, and torsade de pointes. How should we apply the recent FDA ruling?

Authors:  W Victor R Vieweg; Mehrul Hasnain; Robert H Howland; John M Hettema; Christopher Kogut; Mark A Wood; Ananda K Pandurangi
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 4.  Arrhythmias associated with fluoroquinolone therapy.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Petros I Rafailidis; Evangelos S Rosmarakis
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 5.  Sudden death from cardiac causes in children and young adults.

Authors:  R R Liberthson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-04-18       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  A critical evaluation of the cardiac toxicity of citalopram: part 2.

Authors:  Robert H Howland
Journal:  J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 1.098

7.  Diuretic therapy for hypertension and the risk of primary cardiac arrest.

Authors:  D S Siscovick; T E Raghunathan; B M Psaty; T D Koepsell; K G Wicklund; X Lin; L Cobb; P M Rautaharju; M K Copass; E H Wagner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-06-30       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Methadone-associated Q-T interval prolongation and torsades de pointes.

Authors:  John Stringer; Christopher Welsh; Anthony Tommasello
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 2.637

Review 9.  SSRI safety in overdose.

Authors:  J T Barbey; S P Roose
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.384

10.  Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) clinical guidelines for the management of major depressive disorder in adults. III. Pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Raymond W Lam; Sidney H Kennedy; Sophie Grigoriadis; Roger S McIntyre; Roumen Milev; Rajamannar Ramasubbu; Sagar V Parikh; Scott B Patten; Arun V Ravindran
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 4.839

View more
  4 in total

1.  Risk of Cardiac Events Associated With Antidepressant Therapy in Patients With Long QT Syndrome.

Authors:  Meng Wang; Barbara Szepietowska; Bronislava Polonsky; Scott McNitt; Arthur J Moss; Wojciech Zareba; David S Auerbach
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  A review of citalopram dose restrictions in the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders in older adults.

Authors:  Jamie L McCarrell; Trista A Bailey; Nakia A Duncan; Les P Covington; Kalin M Clifford; Ronald G Hall; Amie Taggart Blaszczyk
Journal:  Ment Health Clin       Date:  2019-07-01

Review 3.  Repurposing non-oncology small-molecule drugs to improve cancer therapy: Current situation and future directions.

Authors:  Leilei Fu; Wenke Jin; Jiahui Zhang; Lingjuan Zhu; Jia Lu; Yongqi Zhen; Lan Zhang; Liang Ouyang; Bo Liu; Haiyang Yu
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 11.413

Review 4.  Effects of antidepressants on QT interval in people with mental disorders.

Authors:  Wilbert S Aronow; Tatyana A Shamliyan
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.318

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.