| Literature DB >> 27734300 |
Markus Sack1, Jenny N Lenz2, Mira Jakovcevski3, Sarah V Biedermann1,4, Claudia Falfán-Melgoza1, Jan Deussing3, Maximilian Bielohuby5, Martin Bidlingmaier5, Frederik Pfister6, Günter K Stalla2, Alexander Sartorius1, Peter Gass7, Wolfgang Weber-Fahr1, Johannes Fuss7,8, Matthias K Auer9.
Abstract
Excessive intake of high-caloric diets as well as subsequent development of obesity and diabetes mellitus may exert a wide range of unfavorable effects on the central nervous system (CNS) in the long-term. The potentially harmful effects of such diets were suggested to be mitigated by physical exercise. Here, we conducted a study investigating early effects of a cafeteria-diet on gray and white brain matter volume by means of voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and region-of-interest (ROI) analysis. Half of the mice performed voluntary wheel running to study if regular physical exercise prevents unfavorable effects of a cafeteria-diet. In addition, histological analyses for myelination and neurogenesis were performed. As expected, wheel running resulted in a significant increase of gray matter volume in the CA1-3 areas, the dentate gyrus and stratum granulosum of the hippocampus in the VBM analysis, while a positive effect of the cafeteria-diet was shown for the whole hippocampal CA1-3 area only in the ROI analysis, indicating a regional volume effect. It was earlier found that hippocampal neurogenesis may be related to volume increases after exercise. Interestingly, while running resulted in a significant increase in neurogenesis assessed by doublecortin (DCX)-labeling, this was not true for cafeteria diet. This indicates different underlying mechanisms for gray matter increase. Moreover, animals receiving cafeteria diet only showed mild deficits in long-term memory assessed by the puzzle-box paradigm, while executive functioning and short term memory were not affected. Our data therefore highlight that high caloric diet impacts on the brain and behavior. Physical exercise seems not to interact with these mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: Cognition; Diabetes; Exercise; Grey matter; Obesity; Voxel-based morphometry; White matter
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 27734300 PMCID: PMC5653704 DOI: 10.1007/s11682-016-9638-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Imaging Behav ISSN: 1931-7557 Impact factor: 3.978
Fig. 1Timeline
Fig. 2Scheme of the puzzle box test
Fig. 3Positive effect of factor running (pos. RUN) depicted in red covering partly the bilateral hippocampal areas CA1–3 (in green), dentate gyrus and stratum granulosum (both in blue)
Fig. 4Long-term wheel running within the observation-period had a significant effect on doublecortin-positive cells (DCX) in the subgranular zone of the dentate gyrus (F1,19 = 8.33; p = 0.009) irrespective of the diet provided. In post-hoc-analysis, CR animals had a higher number of DCX-positive cells (19,496 ± 812) in the hippocampus than did CS (11,957 ± 851; p < 0.001) and SS animals (13,258 ± 1500; p = 0.001). Number of DCX- positive cells in SR (20,358 ± 488) animals was higher than in the SS group (p = 0.002) (a). There was neither an effect of diet nor of running on mean intensity for MBP fluorescent staining (b). * indicates a significant difference between SR and CR vs SS and CS
Fig. 5Neither cafeteria diet nor running had an effect on the latency time for goal entering of the different parts of the puzzle box paradigm. Group assignment did not impact measures of cognitive flexibility (T2, T5, T8) nor short-term memory (T3, T6, T9). There was a significant positive effect of cafeteria diet but not for running on time to solve task number T7 (F1,46 = 9.086; p = 0.004), indicating some long-term memory deficits, though this was not true for T4. In post-hoc-analysis, SS (40,9 s ± 15.5; p = 0.046) mice needed significantly less time to leave the start zone than CS (151.5 s ± 33.2) and CR (97.8 s ± 29.5) mice (p = 0.012), while there was no significant difference between SS and SR mice (102 s ± 13.1). There was no indication of increased anxiety, as determined by “time in the center zone” (d)
Fig. 6These results did not seem to be confounded by locomotion, since the average daily running distance in SR animals with 7.1 km/day (± 0.4) was lower in comparison to 8.7 km/day ±0.5 in CR animals (p = 0.025) (a). Although cafeteria diet fed mice were moreover less active in the open field test in distance travelled (F1,46 = 6.31; p = 0.016) and movement time (F 1,46 = 10.63; p = 0.002) (a + b) in comparison to sedentary controls. The overall activity of wheel running mice was also reduced. Running mice traveled significantly shorter distances in the arena compared to sedentary controls (F1,46 = 24.29; p < 0.001) (b). Correspondingly, the time of movement was lower in runners (F1,46 = 18.81; p < 0.001) (c). There was no indication of increased anxiety, as determined by “time in the center zone” (d) (F1,46 = 0,1; p = 0.76).§ indicates a significant difference between SS vs. CR and SR. # indicates a significant difference between CS vs. SR and CR