Literature DB >> 27734205

Persistent Dysphagia After Induction Chemotherapy in Patients with Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Predicts Poor Post-Operative Outcomes.

Michael J McNamara1, David J Adelstein2, Daniela S Allende3, Joanna W Bodmann2, Denise I Ives2, Sudish C Murthy4, Daniel Raymond4, Siva Raja4, Cristina P Rodriguez5, Davendra Sohal2, Kevin L Stephans6, Gregory M M Videtic6, Lisa A Rybicki7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Preoperative therapy is frequently employed in the management of esophageal adenocarcinoma. However, many patients are found to have advanced pathologic stage and have poor outcomes. A prognostic factor which identifies this patient population before surgery would be desirable, as alternative treatment strategies may be warranted.
METHODS: Between 2/08 and 1/12, 60 evaluable patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma enrolled in single-arm phase II trial of induction chemotherapy, surgery, and post-operative adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (CRT). A clinical stage of T3, N1, or M1a (AJCC 6th) was required for eligibility. Induction chemotherapy with epirubicin 50 mg/m2 d1, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 d1, and fluorouracil 200 mg/m2/day continuous infusion for 3 weeks, was given every 21 days for 3 cycles and was followed by surgical resection. Adjuvant CRT consisted of 50-55 Gy @ 1.8-2.0 Gy/day and 2 cycles of cisplatin (20 mg/m2/day) and fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2/day) given as 96-h infusions during weeks 1 and 4 of radiotherapy. Dysphagia was assessed at baseline and after induction chemotherapy.
RESULTS: Persistent dysphagia was associated with worse distant metastatic control [HR 3.48 (1.43-8.43), p = 0.006], recurrence free survival [HR 3.04 (1.34-6.92), p = 0.008], and overall survival [HR 3.31 (1.43-7.66), p = 0.005]. Persistent dysphagia was associated with more advanced pathologic T descriptor (pT) (p = 0.048) and N descriptor (pN) (p = 0.002), a greater median number of involved lymph nodes (3 v 1, p = 0.003), and greater residual tumor viability (p = 0.05). No patients with persistent dysphagia had pT0-T2 or pN0 disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Persistent dysphagia after induction chemotherapy is associated with more advanced pathologic stage and inferior outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dysphagia; Esophageal cancer; Preoperative chemotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27734205     DOI: 10.1007/s12029-016-9881-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer


  29 in total

1.  Genetic variations in radiation and chemotherapy drug action pathways predict clinical outcomes in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Xifeng Wu; Jian Gu; Tsung-Teh Wu; Stephen G Swisher; Zhongxin Liao; Arlene M Correa; Jun Liu; Carol J Etzel; Christopher I Amos; Maosheng Huang; Silvia S Chiang; Luke Milas; Walter N Hittelman; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer staged with [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET): can postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET predict the utility of resection?

Authors:  Arta Monir Monjazeb; Greg Riedlinger; Mebea Aklilu; Kim R Geisinger; Girish Mishra; Scott Isom; Paige Clark; Edward A Levine; A William Blackstock
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Endoscopic ultrasound in staging esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results of a multicenter cohort analysis.

Authors:  Hauke Sebastian Heinzow; Hans Seifert; Sven Tsepetonidis; Heiner Wolters; Torsten Kucharzik; Wolfram Domschke; Dirk Domagk; Tobias Meister
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Endoscopic ultrasound cannot determine suitability for esophagectomy after aggressive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  G Zuccaro; T W Rice; J Goldblum; S V Medendorp; M Becker; R Pimentel; L Gitlin; D J Adelstein
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: data-driven staging for the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Cancer Staging Manuals.

Authors:  Thomas W Rice; Valerie W Rusch; Hemant Ishwaran; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  T N Walsh; N Noonan; D Hollywood; A Kelly; N Keeling; T P Hennessy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound for restaging esophageal carcinoma after chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Ishaan Kalha; Madhukar Kaw; Norio Fukami; Mihir Patel; Sandeep Singh; Harish Gagneja; Deborah Cohen; Jeffrey Morris
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  PET to assess early metabolic response and to guide treatment of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: the MUNICON phase II trial.

Authors:  Florian Lordick; Katja Ott; Bernd-Joachim Krause; Wolfgang A Weber; Karen Becker; Hubert J Stein; Sylvie Lorenzen; Tibor Schuster; Hinrich Wieder; Ken Herrmann; Rainer Bredenkamp; Heinz Höfler; Ulrich Fink; Christian Peschel; Markus Schwaiger; Jörg R Siewert
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Prognostic significance of histopathological tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Rupert Langer; Katja Ott; Marcus Feith; Florian Lordick; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert; Karen Becker
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 7.842

10.  Tumor stage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy determines survival after surgery for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  Andrew R Davies; James A Gossage; Janine Zylstra; Fredrik Mattsson; Jesper Lagergren; Nick Maisey; Elizabeth C Smyth; David Cunningham; William H Allum; Robert C Mason
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.