Literature DB >> 27733438

Therapeutic appropriation: a new concept in the ethics of clinical research.

Rosalind McDougall1, Dominique Martin2, Lynn Gillam1, Nina Hallowell3, Alison Brookes1, Marilys Guillemin1.   

Abstract

Ethical concerns about therapeutic misconception have been raised since the early 1980s. This concept was originally described as research participants' assumptions that decisions relating to research interventions are made on the basis of their individual therapeutic needs. The term has since been used to refer to a range of 'misunderstandings' that research participants may have. In this paper, we describe a new concept-therapeutic appropriation Therapeutic appropriation occurs when patients, or clinicians, actively reframe research participation as an opportunity to enhance patients' clinical care, while simultaneously acknowledging the generalised research aims. To illustrate the concept of therapeutic appropriation, we draw on data from an interview study which we conducted to investigate the experiences of patients and general practitioners involved in clinical trials in primary care. We argue that therapeutic appropriation has two key elements: comprehension that the research project is not necessarily aiming to benefit participants and the deliberate use of incidental features of the research for personal therapeutic benefit of various kinds. We conclude that therapeutic appropriation is a useful concept that refines understanding of potential ethical problems in clinical research, and points to strategies to address them. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical Ethics; Informed Consent; Primary Care; Research Ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27733438     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  2 in total

1.  Patients' Views of Treatment-Focused Genetic Testing (TFGT): Some Lessons for the Mainstreaming of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing.

Authors:  Sarah Wright; Mary Porteous; Diane Stirling; Julia Lawton; Oliver Young; Charlie Gourley; Nina Hallowell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Ethical Development of Artificial Amniotic Sac and Placenta Technology: A Roadmap.

Authors:  E J Verweij; Lien De Proost; Judith O E H van Laar; Lily Frank; Sylvia A Obermann-Borstn; Marijn J Vermeulen; Sophie van Baalen; M Beatrijs van der Hout-van der Jagt; Elselijn Kingma
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.418

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.