A Gronchi1, S Stacchiotti2, P Verderio3, S Ferrari4, J Martin Broto5, A Lopez-Pousa6, A Llombart-Bosch7, A P Dei Tos8, P Collini9, J Cruz Jurado10, A De Paoli11, D M Donati12, A Poveda13, V Quagliuolo14, A Comandone15, G Grignani16, C Morosi17, A Messina17, R De Sanctis18, S Bottelli3, E Palassini2, P G Casali2, Piero Picci19. 1. Department of Surgery alessandro.gronchi@istitutotumori.mi.it. 2. Department of Cancer Medicine. 3. Department of Unit of Medical Statistics, Biometry and Bioinformatics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan. 4. Department of Cancer Medicine, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy. 5. Department of Cancer Medicine, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla. 6. Department of Cancer Medicine, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona. 7. Department of Pathology, Medical School University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain. 8. Department of Pathology, Treviso General Hospital, Treviso. 9. Department of Pathology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. 10. Department of Cancer Medicine, University of Canarias Hospital, La Laguna, Spain. 11. Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano. 12. Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy. 13. Department of Cancer Medicine, Valencian Oncologic Institute, Valencia, Spain. 14. Department of Surgery, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano. 15. Department of Cancer Medicine, Presidio Sanitario Gradenigo, Torino. 16. Department of Cancer Medicine, IRCC Fondazione Piemontese per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Candiolo. 17. Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan. 18. Department of Cancer Medicine, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano. 19. Laboratory of Oncologic Research, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To report on long-term results of a phase 3 trial comparing three versus five cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) with full-dose epirubicin+ifosfamide in high-risk soft tissue sarcomas (STS). METHODS:Patients (pts) were randomized to receive three preoperative cycles of epirubicin 120 mg/m2 and ifosfamide 9 g/m2 (Arm A) or to receive the same three preoperative cycles plus two postoperative cycles (Arm B). Radiotherapy could be either delivered in the preoperative or in the postoperative setting. Non-inferiority of the primary end point, OS, was assessed by the confidence interval of the hazard ratio (HR; Arm A/Arm B) derived from Cox model. RESULTS:Between January 2002 and April 2007, 164 pts were assigned to arm A and 164 to arm B. At a median follow-up (FU) of 117 months (IQ range 103-135 months), 123 deaths were recorded: 58 in Arm A and 65 in Arm B. Ten-year OS was 61% for the entire group of patients: 64% in Arm A and 59% in Arm B. The intention-to-treat analysis confirmed that three cycles were not inferior to five cycles (one-sided 95% upper confidence limit was 1.24). A per protocol analysis was consistent with these results. Pts with leiomyosarcoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) had the lowest, and the highest response rates, respectively. Consistently, Leiomyosarcoma and UPS had the worse and the best prognosis, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: At a longer FU, the non-inferiority of three cycles of a full-dose conventional CT in comparison to five is confirmed. Response to therapy is also confirmed to be associated with better survival. This regimen is currently tested within an ongoing international trial against three cycles of a neoadjuvant histology-tailored CT (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01710176).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: To report on long-term results of a phase 3 trial comparing three versus five cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) with full-dose epirubicin+ifosfamide in high-risk soft tissue sarcomas (STS). METHODS:Patients (pts) were randomized to receive three preoperative cycles of epirubicin 120 mg/m2 and ifosfamide 9 g/m2 (Arm A) or to receive the same three preoperative cycles plus two postoperative cycles (Arm B). Radiotherapy could be either delivered in the preoperative or in the postoperative setting. Non-inferiority of the primary end point, OS, was assessed by the confidence interval of the hazard ratio (HR; Arm A/Arm B) derived from Cox model. RESULTS: Between January 2002 and April 2007, 164 pts were assigned to arm A and 164 to arm B. At a median follow-up (FU) of 117 months (IQ range 103-135 months), 123 deaths were recorded: 58 in Arm A and 65 in Arm B. Ten-year OS was 61% for the entire group of patients: 64% in Arm A and 59% in Arm B. The intention-to-treat analysis confirmed that three cycles were not inferior to five cycles (one-sided 95% upper confidence limit was 1.24). A per protocol analysis was consistent with these results. Pts with leiomyosarcoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) had the lowest, and the highest response rates, respectively. Consistently, Leiomyosarcoma and UPS had the worse and the best prognosis, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: At a longer FU, the non-inferiority of three cycles of a full-dose conventional CT in comparison to five is confirmed. Response to therapy is also confirmed to be associated with better survival. This regimen is currently tested within an ongoing international trial against three cycles of a neoadjuvant histology-tailored CT (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01710176).
Authors: Javier Martin-Broto; Nadia Hindi; Josefina Cruz; Javier Martinez-Trufero; Claudia Valverde; Luis M De Sande; Angeles Sala; Lorena Bellido; Ana De Juan; Jordi Rubió-Casadevall; Roberto Diaz-Beveridge; Ricardo Cubedo; Oscar Tendero; Diego Salinas; Isidro Gracia; Rafael Ramos; Silvia Baguè; Antonio Gutierrez; José Duran-Moreno; Antonio Lopez-Pousa Journal: Oncologist Date: 2018-11-08
Authors: Christian Rothermundt; Galina F Fischer; Sebastian Bauer; Jean-Yves Blay; Viktor Grünwald; Antoine Italiano; Bernd Kasper; Attila Kollár; Lars H Lindner; Aisha Miah; Stefan Sleijfer; Silvia Stacchiotti; Paul Martin Putora Journal: Oncologist Date: 2017-11-30
Authors: A López-Pousa; J Martin Broto; J Martinez Trufero; I Sevilla; C Valverde; R Alvarez; J A Carrasco Alvarez; J Cruz Jurado; N Hindi; X Garcia Del Muro Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Maria Anna Smolle; Dimosthenis Andreou; Per-Ulf Tunn; Joanna Szkandera; Bernadette Liegl-Atzwanger; Andreas Leithner Journal: EFORT Open Rev Date: 2017-10-17
Authors: Rolf D Issels; Lars H Lindner; Jaap Verweij; Rüdiger Wessalowski; Peter Reichardt; Peter Wust; Pirus Ghadjar; Peter Hohenberger; Martin Angele; Christoph Salat; Zeljko Vujaskovic; Soeren Daugaard; Olav Mella; Ulrich Mansmann; Hans Roland Dürr; Thomas Knösel; Sultan Abdel-Rahman; Michael Schmidt; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Karl-Walter Jauch; Claus Belka; Alessandro Gronchi Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Ciara M Kelly; Cristina R Antonescu; Timothy Bowler; Rodrigo Munhoz; Ping Chi; Mark A Dickson; Mrinal M Gounder; Mary Louise Keohan; Sujana Movva; Reena Dholakia; Hamza Ahmad; Matthew Biniakewitz; Mercedes Condy; Haley Phelan; Margaret Callahan; Phillip Wong; Sam Singer; Charlotte Ariyan; Edmund K Bartlett; Aimee Crago; Sam Yoon; Sinchun Hwang; Joseph P Erinjeri; Li-Xuan Qin; William D Tap; Sandra P D'Angelo Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 33.006