Literature DB >> 27732678

Correction: Social Groups Prioritize Selective Attention to Faces: How Social Identity Shapes Distractor Interference.

Gewnhi Park, Jay J Van Bavel, LaBarron K Hill, DeWayne P Williams, Julian F Thayer.   

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161426.].

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27732678      PMCID: PMC5061433          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


The second author’s name is spelled incorrectly. The correct name is: Jay J. Van Bavel. The correct citation is: Park G, Van Bavel JJ, Hill LK, Williams DP, Thayer JF (2016) Social Groups Prioritize Selective Attention to Faces: How Social Identity Shapes Distractor Interference. PLoS ONE 11(8): e0161426. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161426 Additionally, there are typos in the x-axis in Fig 3. It should read “high load,” not “how load.” Please view the corrected Fig 3 here.
Fig 3

Accuracy rates and standard errors as a function of perceptual load and race of participants and distractor faces in Experiment 1.

Black participants were less accurate on trials with other-race (White) compared to own-race (Black) face distractors under high perceptual load; however, there was no difference in accuracy between other-race (White) and own-race (Black) face distractors under low perceptual load. Likewise, White participants were less accurate on trials with other-race (Black) compared to own-race (White) face distractors under high perceptual load; however, there was no difference in accuracy between other-race (Black) and own-race (White) face distractors under low perceptual load. It should be noted that the analysis was presented in Fig 3 was based on the raw means, not parameters from the multi-level models. Error bars = standard errors. Note: * p ≤ .05.

Accuracy rates and standard errors as a function of perceptual load and race of participants and distractor faces in Experiment 1.

Black participants were less accurate on trials with other-race (White) compared to own-race (Black) face distractors under high perceptual load; however, there was no difference in accuracy between other-race (White) and own-race (Black) face distractors under low perceptual load. Likewise, White participants were less accurate on trials with other-race (Black) compared to own-race (White) face distractors under high perceptual load; however, there was no difference in accuracy between other-race (Black) and own-race (White) face distractors under low perceptual load. It should be noted that the analysis was presented in Fig 3 was based on the raw means, not parameters from the multi-level models. Error bars = standard errors. Note: * p ≤ .05.
  1 in total

1.  Social Groups Prioritize Selective Attention to Faces: How Social Identity Shapes Distractor Interference.

Authors:  Gewnhi Park; Jay J Van Bavel; LaBarron K Hill; DeWayne P Williams; Julian F Thayer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.