Literature DB >> 27730748

A new standard of visual data representation for imaging mass spectrometry.

Matthew B O'Rourke1, Matthew P Padula1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: MALDI imaging MS (IMS) is principally used for cancer diagnostics. In our own experience with publishing IMS data, we have been requested to modify our protocols with respect to the areas of the tissue that are imaged in order to comply with the wider literature. In light of this, we have determined that current methodologies lack effective controls and can potentially introduce bias by only imaging specific areas of the targeted tissue EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: A previously imaged sample was selected and then cropped in different ways to show the potential effect of only imaging targeted areas.
RESULTS: By using a model sample, we were able to effectively show how selective imaging of samples can misinterpret tissue features and by changing the areas that are acquired, according to our new standard, an effective internal control can be introduced. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Current IMS sampling convention relies on the assumption that sample preparation has been performed correctly. This prevents users from checking whether molecules have moved beyond borders of the tissue due to delocalization and consequentially products of improper sample preparation could be interpreted as biological features that are of critical importance when encountered in a visual diagnostic.
© 2016 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Imaging; MALDI IMS; Mass Spectrometry; Tissue Imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27730748     DOI: 10.1002/prca.201600098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl        ISSN: 1862-8346            Impact factor:   3.494


  5 in total

1.  Beyond the H&E: Advanced Technologies for in situ Tissue Biomarker Imaging.

Authors:  Lauren E Himmel; Troy A Hackett; Jessica L Moore; Wilson R Adams; Giju Thomas; Tatiana Novitskaya; Richard M Caprioli; Andries Zijlstra; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen; Kelli L Boyd
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2018-12-01

2.  Optimal Preparation of Formalin Fixed Samples for Peptide Based Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging Workflows.

Authors:  Matthew B O'Rourke; Matthew P Padula; Caine Smith; Priscilla Youssef; Stuart Cordwell; Paul Witting; Greg Sutherland; Ben Crossett
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Balancing sufficiency and impact in reporting standards for mass spectrometry imaging experiments.

Authors:  Ove J R Gustafsson; Lyron J Winderbaum; Mark R Condina; Berin A Boughton; Brett R Hamilton; Eivind A B Undheim; Michael Becker; Peter Hoffmann
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 6.524

Review 4.  Mass Spectrometry Imaging: A Review of Emerging Advancements and Future Insights.

Authors:  Amanda Rae Buchberger; Kellen DeLaney; Jillian Johnson; Lingjun Li
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Reporting of Hybrid Data and the Difficulties with Cross-Discipline Research Techniques.

Authors:  Matthew B O'Rourke; Matthew P Padula
Journal:  Proteomes       Date:  2020-11-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.