Michelle White1, Dennis Alcorn2, Kirsten Randall2, Stephanie Duncan2, Heather Klassen2, Mark Shrime3. 1. M/V Africa Mercy, Mercy Ships, Port au Toamasina, Madagascar. doctormcw@gmail.com. 2. M/V Africa Mercy, Mercy Ships, Port au Toamasina, Madagascar. 3. Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Billions of people worldwide lack access to safe affordable surgery. Surgical missions and non-governmental organisations (NGO) are vital in meeting this need, but long-term outcomes are rarely reported. Mercy Ships is a surgical NGO, and we aimed to measure disability-free survival, impact and patient satisfaction in Madagascar after a 7-month mission. METHOD: We aimed to evaluate 346 patients. Primary outcome measure was the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0); secondary outcomes were residual pain; changes in perception of shame and acceptance by society; and overall satisfaction with surgery. Linear regression used to determine association between covariates and each outcome measure. RESULTS: One hundred patients were uncontactable and 98 failed to attend, leaving 148 for final evaluation at a median duration of 8 months. Median WHODAS 2.0 was 2.1 % (range 0-25 %); 1 patient had a score of 25 % defined as disability. 32/148 had residual pain; average pain score of 1.8/5. Overall patient satisfaction was 4.7/5 (94 %). Median patient shame scores fell from 2.9/5 (58 %) to 0.3/5 (6 %) and median acceptance scores rose from 3.3/5 (66 %) to 4.8/5 (96 %) (both p ≤ 0.001) postoperatively. WHODAS 2.0 significantly correlated with gender and postoperative pain (both p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: Surgical missions have a duty-of-care to evaluate outcomes, and WHODAS 2.0 is a quick, reliable method to ensure surgeries do no harm. Measurements of perception of shame, acceptance by society, patient expectation and satisfaction can also be reliably measured and should not be forgotten by surgical NGOs.
BACKGROUND: Billions of people worldwide lack access to safe affordable surgery. Surgical missions and non-governmental organisations (NGO) are vital in meeting this need, but long-term outcomes are rarely reported. Mercy Ships is a surgical NGO, and we aimed to measure disability-free survival, impact and patient satisfaction in Madagascar after a 7-month mission. METHOD: We aimed to evaluate 346 patients. Primary outcome measure was the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0); secondary outcomes were residual pain; changes in perception of shame and acceptance by society; and overall satisfaction with surgery. Linear regression used to determine association between covariates and each outcome measure. RESULTS: One hundred patients were uncontactable and 98 failed to attend, leaving 148 for final evaluation at a median duration of 8 months. Median WHODAS 2.0 was 2.1 % (range 0-25 %); 1 patient had a score of 25 % defined as disability. 32/148 had residual pain; average pain score of 1.8/5. Overall patient satisfaction was 4.7/5 (94 %). Median patient shame scores fell from 2.9/5 (58 %) to 0.3/5 (6 %) and median acceptance scores rose from 3.3/5 (66 %) to 4.8/5 (96 %) (both p ≤ 0.001) postoperatively. WHODAS 2.0 significantly correlated with gender and postoperative pain (both p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: Surgical missions have a duty-of-care to evaluate outcomes, and WHODAS 2.0 is a quick, reliable method to ensure surgeries do no harm. Measurements of perception of shame, acceptance by society, patient expectation and satisfaction can also be reliably measured and should not be forgotten by surgical NGOs.
Authors: Nakul P Raykar; Alexis N Bowder; Charles Liu; Martha Vega; Jong H Kim; Gloria Boye; Sarah L M Greenberg; Johanna N Riesel; Rowan D Gillies; John G Meara; Nobhojit Roy Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-04-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Rebecca G Maine; William Y Hoffman; Jorge H Palacios-Martinez; D Scott Corlew; George A Gregory Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Christian W Ertl; David Royal; Humayoon Abdul Arzoiey; Azizullah Shefa; Salim Sultani; Mohammed Omar Mosafa; Safiullah Sadat; Lewis Zirkle Journal: Mil Med Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Kyle R Stephens; Faseeh Shahab; Daniel Galat; Duane Anderson; Paul S Whiting; Douglas W Lundy; Lewis G Zirkle Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: John G Meara; Andrew J M Leather; Lars Hagander; Blake C Alkire; Nivaldo Alonso; Emmanuel A Ameh; Stephen W Bickler; Lesong Conteh; Anna J Dare; Justine Davies; Eunice Dérivois Mérisier; Shenaaz El-Halabi; Paul E Farmer; Atul Gawande; Rowan Gillies; Sarah L M Greenberg; Caris E Grimes; Russell L Gruen; Edna Adan Ismail; Thaim Buya Kamara; Chris Lavy; Ganbold Lundeg; Nyengo C Mkandawire; Nakul P Raykar; Johanna N Riesel; Edgar Rodas; John Rose; Nobhojit Roy; Mark G Shrime; Richard Sullivan; Stéphane Verguet; David Watters; Thomas G Weiser; Iain H Wilson; Gavin Yamey; Winnie Yip Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-04-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Michelle C White; Kirsten Randall; Esther Avara; Jenny Mullis; Gary Parker; Mark G Shrime Journal: World J Surg Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Michelle C White; Kirsten Randall; Dennis Alcorn; Rachel Greenland; Christine Glasgo; Mark G Shrime Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-04-27 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Michelle C White; Kirsten Randall; Vaonandianina A Ravelojaona; Hery H Andriamanjato; Vanessa Andean; James Callahan; Mark G Shrime; Stephanie Russ; Andrew J M Leather; Nick Sevdalis Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2018-12-20
Authors: Chelsea Leversedge; Samuel Castro; Luis Miguel Castro Appiani; Robin Kamal; Lauren Shapiro Journal: World J Surg Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 3.282