Rasagiline for sleep disorders in patients with Parkinson's disease: a prospective observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Rasagiline is a selective, irreversible monoamine oxidase B inhibitor that ameliorates the symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) by inhibiting striatal dopamine metabolism. There is also evidence that monoamine oxidase B inhibitors increase melatonin levels in the pineal gland and may have a beneficial effect on sleep disorders, which are a common feature in patients with PD.
METHODS: This single-center, prospective, observational, 12-week study compared the effect of combination therapy with levodopa 200-300 mg/d + rasagiline 1 mg/d (n=19) with levodopa 200-300 mg/d alone (n=19) in the treatment of sleep disorders in patients with idiopathic PD.
RESULTS: After 12 weeks' treatment, mean sleep latency was significantly (P<0.001) lower and the improvement in sleep latency from baseline was significantly (P=0.001) greater in patients receiving levodopa + rasagiline than in patients receiving levodopa alone. Similarly, at the end of the study, the mean total sleep time was significantly (P=0.002) longer and the improvement from baseline in mean total sleep time was significantly (P=0.026) greater in patients receiving levodopa + rasagiline than levodopa alone. There were no significant differences between treatment groups for the mean number of awakenings reported at week 12 nor the change from baseline to week 12 in mean number of awakenings.
CONCLUSION: Adding rasagiline to levodopa improved sleep outcomes and may be an appropriate option for patients with PD experiencing sleep disorders.

Introduction

Idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (PD) is often associated with sleep disorders, the most common of which are insomnia, increased daytime sleepiness, restless legs syndrome, and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder.1 Polysomnographic studies have demonstrated that patients with PD experience increased sleep latency, reduced sleep efficiency, and reduced duration of REM sleep.2 Sleep disorders affect approximately two-thirds of patients with PD,3 and these patients are likely to experience a greater severity of nonmotor PD symptoms than those without sleep disorders.4 Unsurprisingly, sleep disorders in patients with PD have a negative impact on quality of life.2

Assessing sleep using traditional instruments (polysomnography) is both costly and time consuming and requires specialized hospital-based settings. Consequently, sleep scales are widely employed in clinical practice. In patients with PD, individual items of the Parkinson’s Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS) accurately distinguish patients from healthy controls, and items of the PDSS have been shown to correlate with polysomnography.5 The PDSS is also useful to assess the severity of sleep disorders in PD, and individual sleep scales can be used to evaluate response to treatment.

The most frequently used PD medications (eg, levodopa and dopamine agonists) show little efficacy in controlling sleep disturbances.6,7 In fact, dopaminergic medication appears to adversely affect sleep continuity; low-dose dopamine agonists are associated with insomnia while higher doses are associated with day-time sleepiness.1,6

Rasagiline is a selective, irreversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase B (MAOB-I) that ameliorates the symptoms of PD by inhibiting striatal dopamine metabolism.8 MAOB-Is also increase melatonin levels in the pineal gland and may therefore contribute to modulation of wakefulness/sleep patterns and circadian rhythms.9 Rasagiline has been used for many years in the European Union and USA as a first-line treatment for early forms of PD, as well as in combination with levodopa and dopamine agonists in more advanced forms of the disease. Clinical studies with rasagiline have demonstrated that the drug has a good safety profile as monotherapy10 and in combination regimens.11

The aim of this observational study was to compare the efficacy of levodopa + rasagiline with that of levodopa alone in the treatment of sleep disorders in patients with PD.

Methods

Study design and patients

This single-center, prospective, observational study evaluated 38 outpatients with PD experiencing sleep disturbances. The study was performed over 12 weeks from January to June 2015 at the Clinic of Movement Disorders, II Division of Neurology, Second University of Naples, Italy. The study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of Second University of Naples and Security Board, and all participants provided written informed consent. Patient privacy was maintained and only the investigator was able to link data to an individual via the identification number assigned at enrollment.

Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of idiopathic mild-to-moderate PD (Hoehn and Yahr stage 1–2), according to the United Kingdom Parkinson’s Disease Society Brain Bank Diagnostic Criteria. Patients were also required to be experiencing sleep disturbances (including insomnia, hypersomnolence, vivid dreaming, restless legs, and other sleep-related movement disorders), as reported by the patient (PDSS mean score ≥100) and to be receiving treatment with levodopa (200–300 mg/d) with or without rasagiline (1 mg/d, administered in a single dose at 7 pm). Exclusion criteria included the presence of any primary sleep disorder; any neurodegenerative disease other than PD or any type of dementia (according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition criteria), by physician assessment; pregnancy and/or breastfeeding; and comorbidities that could result in secondary sleep disorders, including congestive heart failure, other serious heart disease, severe liver disease/cirrhosis, severe renal failure/dialysis, severe respiratory failure, severe anemia, hypothyroidism, and diabetes. Cutoff values for comorbidity signs and symptoms were not defined; inclusion or exclusion of a given patient was at the investigator’s discretion.

Treatment and assessments

Patients were randomly assigned to 12 weeks’ treatment with levodopa (200–300 mg/d) or levodopa + rasagiline (1 mg/d).

Patient demographics and characteristics were collected at baseline and included family history, age of onset of PD, stage of disease (Hoehn and Yahr staging), motor symptoms (Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale III scores), cognitive function (Mini-Mental State Examination and Beck Depression Inventory scale scores) treatments received, and the presence of comorbidities.

The primary end point was improvement in sleep quality based on sleep latency (hours), number of awakenings, and total sleep time (hours) as recorded in autonomously compiled patient sleep diaries. Patients were required to record, within 30 minutes of waking, information on their sleep–wake cycle for the duration of the study. Clinical evaluations, performed at baseline and at the end of the 12-week study period, included the following: general physical, neurological and psychological examination, assessment of adherence to therapy, administration of the Hoehn and Yahr scale, and administration of the PDSS (a decrease in PDSS scores indicates improvement).

Statistical analysis

Given the observational nature of the study, an expected difference between the two treatment groups was not assumed a priori, and so sample size was not calculated.

Descriptive statistical analyses were performed using a general linear model (GLM) to correct for observed variation in baseline features. Data are expressed as means with standard deviation and mean standard error (SE) for the continuous variables. Normal distribution was tested and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Two-tailed t-tests were applied to evaluate statistical significance within groups and significance of between-group difference was based on analysis of variance models (P<0.05).

Results

All 38 patients completed the 12 weeks’ treatment, and key baseline demographics/clinical characteristics are described in the supplementary information (Table S1). Patients had a mean age of 70.3±10.6 years, 56.8% were male, and mean disease duration was 55.9±5.5 months. Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups. At baseline, almost all the patients reported difficulties in initiating and maintaining sleep, with correspondingly high PDSS (104.7±21.5 and 103.9±21.8 in the monotherapy and combination therapy groups, respectively). The mean levodopa dose was 267.41 mg/d in the combination group vs 281.7 mg/d in the monotherapy group.

Sleep latency (Figure 1A), number of awakenings (Figure 1B), and total sleep time (Figure 1C) all improved significantly from baseline to week 12 in patients receiving levodopa + rasagiline. In contrast, sleep latency was the only measure to show a significant improvement from baseline to week 12 (Figure 1A) with levodopa alone. At 12 weeks and compared with levodopa alone, patients receiving levodopa + rasagiline had a significantly lower mean sleep latency time (Figure 1A), while the improvement from baseline was significantly greater with levodopa + rasagiline (−0.5474±0.69472 h vs −1.6789±1.20627 h; P=0.001). There was no significant difference between treatment groups for the mean number of awakenings reported at week 12 (Figure 1B) or change from baseline to week 12 (−0.2105±0.41885 vs −0.1579±0.50146; P=0.728). At week 12, mean total sleep time was significantly greater in patients receiving combination treatment than monotherapy (Figure 1C), and the improvement from baseline to week 12 was significantly greater with levodopa + rasagiline than levodopa alone (1.2642±1.62450 h vs 0.3211±0.69648 h; P=0.026).

Figure 1

Effects of 12 weeks’ treatment on sleep latency, night-time awakenings, and total sleep time.

Notes: (A) Mean sleep latency at BL and after 12 weeks of treatment with levodopa or levodopa + rasagiline. Sleep latency was assessed using patient sleep diaries. *P=0.003 vs BL, **P<0.001 vs BL; ***P<0.001 vs levodopa alone. (B) Mean number of night-time awakenings at BL and after 12 weeks of treatment with levodopa or levodopa + rasagiline. Night-time awakenings were assessed using patient sleep diaries. *P=0.042 vs BL. (C) Mean total sleep duration at BL and after 12 weeks of treatment with levodopa or levodopa + rasagiline. Total sleep duration was assessed using patient sleep diaries. *P=0.003 vs BL; **P=0.002 vs levodopa alone.

Abbreviation: BL, baseline.

Applying a GLM to correct for baseline features, the treatment received and the baseline value of each end point were significantly related to variation at week 12. The estimated marginal mean of delta sleep latency was −1.57 (SE: 0.166; 95% CI: −1.906, −1.225) in the levodopa + rasagiline group vs −0.58 (SE: 0.181; 95% CI: −0.954, −0.208) in the levodopa alone group (P=0.001); the estimated marginal mean of delta number of awakenings was −0.36 (SE: 0.086; 95% CI: −0.535, −0.182) and 0.004 (SE: 0.101; 95% CI: −0.203, 0.211), respectively (P=0.013), while the estimated marginal mean of delta total sleep hours was 1.35 (SE: 0.315; 95% CI: 0.701, 1.995) vs 0.30 (SE: 0.362; 95% CI: −0.449, 1.041), respectively (P=0.044).

Improvements in PDSS at 12 weeks were greater with combination treatment compared with levodopa alone (Figure 2). A significant reduction in PDSS scores (ie, an improvement in sleep) from baseline to week 12 was observed in six of 15 items in the levodopa alone group (distressing dreams, urine incontinence, limb paresthesia, cramps, tremor, and feeling tired and sleepy) and ten of 15 items (restless limbs, fidgeting in bed, distressing dreams, distressing hallucinations, nycturia, urine incontinence, limb paresthesia, cramps, tremor, and feeling tired and sleepy) in the levodopa + rasagiline group. PDSS scores at 12 weeks were significantly lower with levodopa + rasagiline vs levodopa alone for nycturia (P=0.012) and limb paresthesia (P=0.032), while the change from baseline to week 12 significantly favored levodopa + rasagiline vs levodopa alone for nycturia (P=0.002). Applying a GLM to correct for baseline features, the baseline value of each item was significantly related with variation for 12 of 15 items at week 12.

Figure 2

Change from BL in PDSS item scores after 12 weeks of treatment with levodopa or levodopa + rasagiline.

Notes: Overview of PDSS items: 1= overall quality of night’s sleep; 2= difficulty falling asleep each night; 3= difficulty staying asleep; 4= limb restlessness; 5= fidgeting in bed; 6= distressing dreams; 7= distressing hallucinations; 8= nycturia; 9= urine incontinence; 10= limb paresthesia; 11= cramps; 12= limbs painful posturing; 13= tremor; 14= feeling tired and sleepy; 15= daytime sleepiness. *P=0.002 vs levodopa alone.

Abbreviations: BL, baseline; PDSS, Parkinson’s Disease Sleep Scale.

Discussion

This observational study indicates that the addition of rasagiline to levodopa improves sleep quality in patients with PD experiencing sleep disorders. After 12 weeks’ treatment, sleep latency and total sleep time were significantly more improved in patients receiving combination therapy than in those receiving levodopa alone.

Our findings support those of the randomized, double-blind ACTOR study in patients with PD, which demonstrated that physician-assessed sleep disorders and daytime sleepiness decreased significantly more with rasagiline 1 mg/d than with pramipexole 1.5 mg/d.10

In animal models, it has been shown that inhibition of monoamine oxidase (MAO) also increases melatonin levels in the pineal gland,9 and it is hypothesized that this is how rasagiline may improve sleep disorders in patients with PD. Furthermore, rasagiline lacks amphetamine-like metabolites, and so may confer advantages over other MAOB-Is in the treatment sleep disorders in patients with PD.12

Although the study was prospective, it had a number of limitations including the relatively small number of patients recruited. Furthermore, we restricted our study to subjective symptoms and perception of restfulness using patient sleep diaries and PDSS scores. We accept that detailed assessment of the complex sleep architecture in patients with PD requires additional studies using instrumental techniques that currently are not in common clinical practice (eg, polysomnography), expanding our observations on REM behavior disorder, and periodic limb movement syndrome.

Conclusion

This small monocentric study suggests that rasagiline added to chronic levodopa therapy might provide relevant benefit to patients with PD experiencing sleep disorders. Given the high prevalence of sleep disorders in this population, prospective, randomized studies in more patients and over a longer time period are warranted.

Table S1

Baseline characteristics and demographics

Characteristic	Levodopa (n=19)	Levodopa + rasagiline (n=19)	Total (n=38)
Age, years	71.6±5.76	69.1±14.02	70.3±10.6
Sex, n (%)
Males	10 (52.6)	11 (61.1)	21 (56.8)
Females	9 (47.4)	7 (38.9)	16 (43.2)
Disease duration (months)	56.1±5.08	55.6±5.18	55.9±5.5
Hoehn & Yahr score, n (%)
1	0	5 (26.3)	5 (13.2)
2	8 (42.1)	6 (31.6)	14 (36.8)
3	11 (57.9)	8 (42.1)	19 (50.0)
UPDRS III	26.1±5.9	21.0±2.53	23.5±5.2
PDSS	104.7±21.5	103.9±21.8	104.3±21.6
MMSE	25.5±2.37	25.7±1.60	25.6±2.0
BDI	11.4±1.12	10.8±1.77	11.1±1.5

Note: All values are mean ± SD unless otherwise stated.

Abbreviations: BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; PDSS, Parkinson’s Disease Sleep Scale; UPDRS III, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part III; SD, standard deviation.