Literature DB >> 27728892

CYP2C19 genotyping combined with on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events in Chinese patients with percutaneous coronary intervention.

Xiao-Fang Tang1, Ya-Ling Han2, Jia-Hui Zhang3, Jing Wang3, Yi Yao3, Chen He3, Bo Xu1, Zhan Gao1, Shu-Bin Qiao1, Jue Chen1, Yuan Wu1, Ji-Lin Chen1, Run-Lin Gao1, Yue-Jin Yang4, Jin-Qing Yuan5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Both CYP2C19 genotyping and platelet function testing are used to predict major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in Chinese patients treated with clopidogrel and undergoing stent implantation, but the most accurate prognostic technique is still debated. Here, we combine both techniques, to determine if a more accurate prognosis is possible.
METHODS: Patients undergoing stent implantation (1104) were genotyped and assessed for platelet reactivity, with a 12-month follow-up. The CYP2C19*2 (rs4244285), and *3 (rs4986893) alleles were genotyped. High on treatment platelet reactivity was defined as adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet inhibition ≤30%. MACEs included death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, or stent thrombosis. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Hazard ratios (HRs) for cardiovascular ischemic outcomes based on the two testing methods are as follows. CYP2C19 genotyping: carriers of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles, HR: 2.515, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.150-5.501, P=0.021; ADP-induced platelet inhibition ≤30%, HR: 1.992, 95% CI, 1.040-3.818, P=0.038. An ischemic risk score between zero and two was calculated. Compared with the group with a score of zero, HRs for adverse cardiovascular outcomes were 4.078 for those with a score of two (95% CI: 1.525-10.905, P=0.005). However, there was no significant difference between the group with the score of zero and the group with the score of one. CYP2C19 genotyping combined with platelet reactivity is an independent and additive predictor of 1-year MACE in Chinese patients undergoing stenting with clopidogrel treatment, which is better than either test alone.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CYP2C19; Clopidogrel; Genotyping; Platelet function test

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27728892     DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  3 in total

1.  Clopidogrel utilization in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus: should we determine CYP2C19*2 genotype?

Authors:  Saoussen Chouchene; Rym Dabboubi; Haythem Raddaoui; Hela Abroug; Khaldoun Ben Hamda; Sondess Hadj Fredj; Fatma Abderrazak; Mayssa Gaaloul; Marwa Rezek; Fadoua Neffeti; Ilhem Hellara; Mouna Sassi; Linda Khefacha; Asma Sriha; Semir Nouira; Mohamed Fadhel Najjar; Faouzi Maatouk; Taieb Messaoud; Mohsen Hassine
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  A genetic polymorphism in P2RY1 impacts response to clopidogrel in cats with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Yu Ueda; Ronald H L Li; Nghi Nguyen; Eric S Ontiveros; Samantha L Kovacs; Maureen S Oldach; Karen M Vernau; Michael H Court; Joshua A Stern
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Association between cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphism and clinical outcomes in clopidogrel-treated Uygur population with acute coronary syndrome: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Luhai Yu; Tingting Wang; Huidong Bai; Weijiang Zhu; Yanju Li; Jianhua Wu; Wenli Liu; Li Sun; Aiping Yu; Hongjian Li
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 2.298

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.