Literature DB >> 27728821

Energy efficiency of batch and semi-batch (CCRO) reverse osmosis desalination.

David M Warsinger1, Emily W Tow1, Kishor G Nayar1, Laith A Maswadeh2, John H Lienhard V3.   

Abstract

As reverse osmosis (RO) desalination capacity increases worldwide, the need to reduce its specific energy consumption becomes more urgent. In addition to the incremental changes attainable with improved components such as membranes and pumps, more significant reduction of energy consumption can be achieved through time-varying RO processes including semi-batch processes such as closed-circuit reverse osmosis (CCRO) and fully-batch processes that have not yet been commercialized or modelled in detail. In this study, numerical models of the energy consumption of batch RO (BRO), CCRO, and the standard continuous RO process are detailed. Two new energy-efficient configurations of batch RO are analyzed. Batch systems use significantly less energy than continuous RO over a wide range of recovery ratios and source water salinities. Relative to continuous RO, models predict that CCRO and batch RO demonstrate up to 37% and 64% energy savings, respectively, for brackish water desalination at high water recovery. For batch RO and CCRO, the primary reductions in energy use stem from atmospheric pressure brine discharge and reduced streamwise variation in driving pressure. Fully-batch systems further reduce energy consumption by not mixing streams of different concentrations, which CCRO does. These results demonstrate that time-varying processes can significantly raise RO energy efficiency.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Batch reverse osmosis; Closed-circuit reverse osmosis; Desalination; Energy efficiency; Pressure recovery; Reverse osmosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27728821     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.09.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  4 in total

1.  A review of polymeric membranes and processes for potable water reuse.

Authors:  David M Warsinger; Sudip Chakraborty; Emily W Tow; Megan H Plumlee; Christopher Bellona; Savvina Loutatidou; Leila Karimi; Anne M Mikelonis; Andrea Achilli; Abbas Ghassemi; Lokesh P Padhye; Shane A Snyder; Stefano Curcio; Chad Vecitis; Hassan A Arafat; John H Lienhard
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 29.190

2.  Managing and treating per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in membrane concentrates.

Authors:  Emily W Tow; Mahmut Selim Ersan; Soyoon Kum; Tae Lee; Thomas F Speth; Christine Owen; Christopher Bellona; Mallikarjuna N Nadagouda; Anne M Mikelonis; Paul Westerhoff; Chandra Mysore; Val S Frenkel; Viraj deSilva; W Shane Walker; Andrew K Safulko; David A Ladner
Journal:  AWWA Water Sci       Date:  2021-09-02

Review 3.  Modeling the energy consumption of potable water reuse schemes.

Authors:  Emily W Tow; Anna Letcher Hartman; Aleksander Jaworowski; Ines Zucker; Soyoon Kum; Mojtaba AzadiAghdam; Ernest R Blatchley; Andrea Achilli; Han Gu; Gulsum Melike Urper; David M Warsinger
Journal:  Water Res X       Date:  2021-11-21

Review 4.  Frontiers of Membrane Desalination Processes for Brackish Water Treatment: A Review.

Authors:  Soraya Honarparvar; Xin Zhang; Tianyu Chen; Ashkan Alborzi; Khurshida Afroz; Danny Reible
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.