Literature DB >> 2772806

Follow-up after polypectomy of colorectal adenomas. The importance of total colonoscopy.

K Yashiro1, K Nagasako, S Sato, S Suzuki, H Obata.   

Abstract

Five hundred eighty-two patients with colorectal adenomas or early cancers were polypectomized from 1974 to 1985. In 100 patients, total colonoscopy was performed more than twice after the initial polypectomies. These patients were divided into three groups: group A patients underwent total colonoscopy at 1-year intervals; group B patients underwent total colonoscopy at 2-year intervals, group C patients underwent total colonoscopy at 3-year or more than 3-year intervals. The frequency and location of newly developed adenomas were investigated. The detection rate for new adenomas was 13% in group A and 50% in group B; thus, there was a significant difference between group A and group B (P less than 0.01). The transverse colon is the only segment where the topological proportion of newly developed adenomas increased in comparison with that of index adenomas (P less than 0.05). The detection rate for new adenomas was significantly higher in patients who had carcinoma in situ at the time of initial polypectomy (P less than 0.05). Questionnaires about colonoscopy and colonic adenomas were therefore mailed to the patients who were lost to follow-up after the polypectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2772806     DOI: 10.1007/BF00590907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  14 in total

1.  Polyps of the colon and rectum; a four-year to nine-year follow-up study of five hundred thirty-seven patients.

Authors:  J A RIDER; J B KIRSNER; H C MOELLER; W L PALMER
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1959-06-06

2.  Polyps of the colon and rectum. Statistical analysis of a long term follow-up study.

Authors:  J B KIRSNER; J A RIDER; H C MOELLER; W L PALMER; S S GOLD
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1960-08       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Polyps of the colon and rectum; their incidence and relationship to carcinoma.

Authors:  J A RIDER; J B KIRSNER; H C MOELLER; W L PALMER
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1954-04       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Follow-up after colorectal polypectomy. I. A comparison of the effectiveness of repeated examinations of the colon every 6 and 24 months after removal of stalked polyps.

Authors:  O Kronborg; E Hage; S Adamsen; E Deichgraeber
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Magnitude of risk for cancer in patients with colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  B C Morson; H J Bussey
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Polyp follow-up: how, who for and how often?

Authors:  C B Williams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Risk of recurrence of colon polyps.

Authors:  L G Henry; R E Condon; W J Schulte; C Aprahamian; J J DeCosse
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  A prospective study of diagnostic methods in adenoma follow-up.

Authors:  C B Williams; F A Macrae; C I Bartram
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Surveillance intervals after colonoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  J D Waye; S Braunfeld
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Prognostic evaluation of planned follow-up in patients with colorectal adenomas. An interim report.

Authors:  O Kronborg; C Fenger
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.